Evaluation of imipenem-relebactam susceptibility testing in carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of sensititre microplates, disc diffusion, and MTS gradient strips with broth microdilution.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Adrien Biguenet, Léa Devoos, Julie Rousselot, Maxime Bour, Damien Fournier, Katy Jeannot
{"title":"Evaluation of imipenem-relebactam susceptibility testing in carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of sensititre microplates, disc diffusion, and MTS gradient strips with broth microdilution.","authors":"Adrien Biguenet, Léa Devoos, Julie Rousselot, Maxime Bour, Damien Fournier, Katy Jeannot","doi":"10.1007/s10096-025-05058-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Four commercial tests EUMDROXF<sup>®</sup> Sensititre microplates, MTS gradient strips, and disc diffusion were evaluated for imipenem-relebactam susceptibility in 148 ceftazidime and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference. EUMDROXF<sup>®</sup> Sensititre microplates showed the highest accuracy (CA = 93.2%, EA = 93.9%, and bias difference + 21.8%). While the MTS gradient strips showed acceptable performance (CA = 84.5%; EA = 89.9%, and difference of bias = 21.0%), the disc method misclassified 25.8% (16/62) of the resistant strains. Given these results, considering an Area of Technical Uncertainty (ATU) for disc diffusion (20-24 mm) in imipenem-relebactam testing is recommended for P. aeruginosa strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05058-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Four commercial tests EUMDROXF® Sensititre microplates, MTS gradient strips, and disc diffusion were evaluated for imipenem-relebactam susceptibility in 148 ceftazidime and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference. EUMDROXF® Sensititre microplates showed the highest accuracy (CA = 93.2%, EA = 93.9%, and bias difference + 21.8%). While the MTS gradient strips showed acceptable performance (CA = 84.5%; EA = 89.9%, and difference of bias = 21.0%), the disc method misclassified 25.8% (16/62) of the resistant strains. Given these results, considering an Area of Technical Uncertainty (ATU) for disc diffusion (20-24 mm) in imipenem-relebactam testing is recommended for P. aeruginosa strains.

耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌亚胺培南-瑞巴坦药敏试验的评价:微孔板、圆盘扩散和MTS梯度条与肉汤微量稀释的比较。
以微量肉汤稀释(BMD)为参比,对148株头孢他啶和耐亚胺培南铜绿假单胞菌的亚胺培南-瑞巴坦敏感性进行了评价。EUMDROXF®Sensititre微孔板的准确度最高(CA = 93.2%, EA = 93.9%,偏置差+ 21.8%)。而MTS梯度条表现出良好的性能(CA = 84.5%;EA = 89.9%,偏差差= 21.0%),圆盘法错误分类25.8%(16/62)耐药菌株。鉴于这些结果,建议在铜绿假单胞菌菌株的亚胺培南-瑞巴坦检测中考虑圆盘扩散(20-24 mm)的技术不确定区域(ATU)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
138
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信