Challenges and considerations in non-inferiority trials: a narrative review from statisticians' perspectives.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ruizhe Chen, Qian Shi
{"title":"Challenges and considerations in non-inferiority trials: a narrative review from statisticians' perspectives.","authors":"Ruizhe Chen, Qian Shi","doi":"10.21037/cco-24-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Non-inferiority (NI) study is a popular randomized controlled trial design that aims to demonstrate whether a test treatment, considering its auxiliary benefits, is not unacceptably worse compared to a standard active control treatment. There is extensive work in the literature that discusses NI trials' merits, issues, and how certain clinical and statistical challenges can be addressed. Here, we are aimed to provide a narrative review of NI studies in terms of its design considerations, potential issues, and corresponding solutions from the perspectives of biostatisticians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a wide literature search on clinical and statistical methodology papers related to NI trials.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>In the \"Fundamentals of NI study\" section, we start from the formulation of the margin and the NI hypothesis test and then focus on the underlying two fundamental assumptions (the constancy assumption and assay sensitivity). We present experts and regulatory agencies' opinions on how certain statistical issues of NI studies are caused and how they could be addressed. We focus on key aspects of NI studies, which include formulations of an NI hypothesis test, definition of NI margins, determining historical evidence of the active control drug, checking assay sensitivity and constancy assumption, etc. We also briefly touch on topics such as comparisons between the fixed-margin method and the synthesis method for NI evaluation, analysis principle in presence of treatment non-adherence, Bayesian design of NI studies, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) as a measure for designing NI studies. Figures and examples are given throughout the article to better illustrate ideas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We believe that NI design, with its issues addressed by appropriate statistical and clinical considerations, still plays a pivotal role in clinical research by improving patients' experience and alleviating healthcare inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9945,"journal":{"name":"Chinese clinical oncology","volume":"14 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-84","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Non-inferiority (NI) study is a popular randomized controlled trial design that aims to demonstrate whether a test treatment, considering its auxiliary benefits, is not unacceptably worse compared to a standard active control treatment. There is extensive work in the literature that discusses NI trials' merits, issues, and how certain clinical and statistical challenges can be addressed. Here, we are aimed to provide a narrative review of NI studies in terms of its design considerations, potential issues, and corresponding solutions from the perspectives of biostatisticians.

Methods: We conducted a wide literature search on clinical and statistical methodology papers related to NI trials.

Key content and findings: In the "Fundamentals of NI study" section, we start from the formulation of the margin and the NI hypothesis test and then focus on the underlying two fundamental assumptions (the constancy assumption and assay sensitivity). We present experts and regulatory agencies' opinions on how certain statistical issues of NI studies are caused and how they could be addressed. We focus on key aspects of NI studies, which include formulations of an NI hypothesis test, definition of NI margins, determining historical evidence of the active control drug, checking assay sensitivity and constancy assumption, etc. We also briefly touch on topics such as comparisons between the fixed-margin method and the synthesis method for NI evaluation, analysis principle in presence of treatment non-adherence, Bayesian design of NI studies, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) as a measure for designing NI studies. Figures and examples are given throughout the article to better illustrate ideas.

Conclusions: We believe that NI design, with its issues addressed by appropriate statistical and clinical considerations, still plays a pivotal role in clinical research by improving patients' experience and alleviating healthcare inequalities.

非劣效性试验的挑战和考虑:从统计学家的角度叙述回顾。
背景和目的:非劣效性(NI)研究是一种流行的随机对照试验设计,旨在证明考虑到其辅助益处,测试治疗是否比标准主动对照治疗差得不可接受。文献中有大量的工作讨论NI试验的优点、问题,以及如何解决某些临床和统计挑战。在这里,我们旨在从生物统计学家的角度,就NI研究的设计考虑、潜在问题和相应的解决方案,提供一个叙述性的回顾。方法:我们对与NI试验相关的临床和统计方法学论文进行了广泛的文献检索。关键内容和发现:在“NI研究的基础”部分,我们从边际和NI假设检验的公式开始,然后关注潜在的两个基本假设(恒常性假设和测定灵敏度)。我们就NI研究的某些统计问题是如何引起的以及如何解决这些问题提出了专家和监管机构的意见。我们专注于NI研究的关键方面,包括NI假设检验的公式,NI边际的定义,确定活性对照药物的历史证据,检查检测灵敏度和恒定假设等。我们还简要介绍了固定边际法与NI评估综合法的比较、治疗不依从的分析原则、NI研究的贝叶斯设计以及作为NI研究设计指标的限制平均生存时间(RMST)等主题。为了更好地说明观点,整篇文章都给出了图表和例子。结论:我们认为,通过适当的统计和临床考虑来解决NI设计问题,通过改善患者体验和减轻医疗不平等,仍然在临床研究中发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Chinese Clinical Oncology (Print ISSN 2304-3865; Online ISSN 2304-3873; Chin Clin Oncol; CCO) publishes articles that describe new findings in the field of oncology, and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of cancer. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to cancer. The aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of original research articles as well as review articles in all areas related to cancer. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal with a focus on cutting-edge findings in this rapidly changing field. To that end, Chin Clin Oncol is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into best multimodality practice. The journal features a distinguished editorial board, which brings together a team of highly experienced specialists in cancer treatment and research. The diverse experience of the board members allows our editorial panel to lend their expertise to a broad spectrum of cancer subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信