Phenotyping Exertional Breathlessness Using Cardiopulmonary Cycle Exercise Testing in People With Chronic Airflow Limitation.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.033
Magnus Ekström, Pei Zhi Li, Hayley Lewthwaite, Jean Bourbeau, Wan C Tan, Dennis Jensen
{"title":"Phenotyping Exertional Breathlessness Using Cardiopulmonary Cycle Exercise Testing in People With Chronic Airflow Limitation.","authors":"Magnus Ekström, Pei Zhi Li, Hayley Lewthwaite, Jean Bourbeau, Wan C Tan, Dennis Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exertional breathlessness is a cardinal symptom of people with chronic airflow limitation (CAL) and can be evaluated using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does abnormally high exertional breathlessness in relationship to the rate of oxygen uptake (V'O<sub>2</sub>) and minute ventilation (V'<sub>E</sub>) indicate different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and clinical characteristics in people with CAL?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Analysis of people ≥ 40 years of age with CAL (FEV<sub>1</sub> to FVC ratio after bronchodilation less than lower limit of normal) undergoing symptom-limited incremental cycle CPET in the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease study. Using published normative references, breathlessness phenotypes at peak exercise were categorized as abnormal (Borg 0-10 scale intensity rating more than upper limit of normal) by V'O<sub>2</sub> alone, abnormal by both V'O<sub>2</sub> and V'<sub>E</sub>, or normal by both V'O<sub>2</sub> and V'<sub>E</sub>. Exercise physiologic responses and clinical characteristics were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 325 people (44% women) with CAL (mean (SD) FEV<sub>1</sub>, 75.4 (17.5)% predicted). Compared with the normal by both V'O<sub>2</sub> and V'<sub>E</sub> group (n = 237 [73%]), the abnormal by V'O<sub>2</sub> only group (n = 29 [9%]) showed lower pulmonary diffusing capacity and greater exercise ventilatory inefficiency, whereas the abnormal by both V'O<sub>2</sub> and V'<sub>E</sub> group (n = 50 [15%]) showed even worse lung function, dynamic critical inspiratory constraints, and exertional breathlessness along with greater symptom burden in daily life, lower physical activity, and worse health status.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Exertional breathlessness phenotyped in relationship to V'O<sub>2</sub> and V'<sub>E</sub> using normative reference equations enable multivariable analyses of underlying symptom mechanisms and associated clinical characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exertional breathlessness is a cardinal symptom of people with chronic airflow limitation (CAL) and can be evaluated using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).

Research question: Does abnormally high exertional breathlessness in relationship to the rate of oxygen uptake (V'O2) and minute ventilation (V'E) indicate different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and clinical characteristics in people with CAL?

Study design and methods: Analysis of people ≥ 40 years of age with CAL (FEV1 to FVC ratio after bronchodilation less than lower limit of normal) undergoing symptom-limited incremental cycle CPET in the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease study. Using published normative references, breathlessness phenotypes at peak exercise were categorized as abnormal (Borg 0-10 scale intensity rating more than upper limit of normal) by V'O2 alone, abnormal by both V'O2 and V'E, or normal by both V'O2 and V'E. Exercise physiologic responses and clinical characteristics were compared between groups.

Results: We included 325 people (44% women) with CAL (mean (SD) FEV1, 75.4 (17.5)% predicted). Compared with the normal by both V'O2 and V'E group (n = 237 [73%]), the abnormal by V'O2 only group (n = 29 [9%]) showed lower pulmonary diffusing capacity and greater exercise ventilatory inefficiency, whereas the abnormal by both V'O2 and V'E group (n = 50 [15%]) showed even worse lung function, dynamic critical inspiratory constraints, and exertional breathlessness along with greater symptom burden in daily life, lower physical activity, and worse health status.

Interpretation: Exertional breathlessness phenotyped in relationship to V'O2 and V'E using normative reference equations enable multivariable analyses of underlying symptom mechanisms and associated clinical characteristics.

使用心肺循环运动试验分析慢性气流受限患者的运动性呼吸困难表型。
背景:运动性呼吸困难是慢性气流受限(CAL)患者的主要症状,可通过心肺运动试验(CPET)进行评估。研究问题:与摄氧量(V'O2)和分分钟通气量(V'E)相关的异常高的运动性呼吸困难是否表明CAL患者不同的潜在病理生理机制和临床特征?研究设计和方法:分析年龄≥40岁、单独V'O2异常、V'O2+V'E异常、V'O2和V'E均正常(b -正常)的支气管扩张后FEV1/FVC上限正常的人群。比较两组患者运动生理反应及临床特点。结果:我们纳入325例CAL患者(44%为女性)(预测FEV1 75.4±[标准差]17.5%)。与b -正常组(n=237[73%])相比,B-V'O2组(n=29[9%])肺弥散能力较低,运动通气效率较低,而B-V'O2+V'E组(n=50[15%])肺功能更差,动态临界吸气受限,运动性呼吸困难,日常生活症状负担更大,体力活动更少,健康状况更差。解释:使用规范的参考方程,可以对潜在症状机制和相关临床特征进行多变量分析,从而得出与V'O2和V'E相关的运动性呼吸困难表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信