Circulating Inflammation Biomarkers and the Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Nested Case-control Study in the Department of Defense Serum Repository.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Omonefe O Omofuma, Jennifer A Rusiecki, Jessica L Petrick, Roni T Falk, William Wheeler, Ruth M Pfeiffer, M Constanza Camargo, Michael B Cook
{"title":"Circulating Inflammation Biomarkers and the Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Nested Case-control Study in the Department of Defense Serum Repository.","authors":"Omonefe O Omofuma, Jennifer A Rusiecki, Jessica L Petrick, Roni T Falk, William Wheeler, Ruth M Pfeiffer, M Constanza Camargo, Michael B Cook","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously identified associations of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) risk with four inflammation-related candidate biomarkers: TNFR2, IL17A, VEGFR3 and resistin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to replicate these candidates and discover novel associations with additional proteins. We conducted a nested case-control study of men with prediagnostic biospecimens stored at the US Department of Defense Serum Repository, including 203 incident EA cases. Controls were matched to cases in an ~2:1 ratio by date of birth, race, service branch, and blood draw date. Multiplex immunoassays (Olink/Proseek panels) measured 254 proteins detected in ≥10% of all samples. Multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression models calculated associations between biomarker quantiles and EA. P-values (<0.05) were used to indicate the statistical significance of candidates, and false discovery rate (FDR) was applied to the additional proteins. Odds ratios (ORs) from the current analysis and from previous studies were combined for the candidate markers using fixed effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the four candidates, the highest category of TNFR2 was associated with significantly increased EA risk (ORQ4vsQ1=1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-3.42). In the meta-analysis, associations with EA were positive for TNFR2 (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs-lowest=2.04, 1.12-2.95) and inverse for IL17A (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs-lowest=0.53, 0.26-0.80). Of the additional 250 proteins, 45 were associated with EA risk and 6 (MCP3, IL6, TNFR1, HGF, TFF3 and FURIN) remained significant after FDR correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed associations of TNFR2 and IL17A with EA risk. Additionally, our study expands the range of proteins associated with EA development.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This is the largest assessment of inflammation-related proteins with EA to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We previously identified associations of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) risk with four inflammation-related candidate biomarkers: TNFR2, IL17A, VEGFR3 and resistin.

Methods: We aimed to replicate these candidates and discover novel associations with additional proteins. We conducted a nested case-control study of men with prediagnostic biospecimens stored at the US Department of Defense Serum Repository, including 203 incident EA cases. Controls were matched to cases in an ~2:1 ratio by date of birth, race, service branch, and blood draw date. Multiplex immunoassays (Olink/Proseek panels) measured 254 proteins detected in ≥10% of all samples. Multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression models calculated associations between biomarker quantiles and EA. P-values (<0.05) were used to indicate the statistical significance of candidates, and false discovery rate (FDR) was applied to the additional proteins. Odds ratios (ORs) from the current analysis and from previous studies were combined for the candidate markers using fixed effects meta-analysis.

Results: Among the four candidates, the highest category of TNFR2 was associated with significantly increased EA risk (ORQ4vsQ1=1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-3.42). In the meta-analysis, associations with EA were positive for TNFR2 (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs-lowest=2.04, 1.12-2.95) and inverse for IL17A (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs-lowest=0.53, 0.26-0.80). Of the additional 250 proteins, 45 were associated with EA risk and 6 (MCP3, IL6, TNFR1, HGF, TFF3 and FURIN) remained significant after FDR correction.

Conclusions: We confirmed associations of TNFR2 and IL17A with EA risk. Additionally, our study expands the range of proteins associated with EA development.

Impact: This is the largest assessment of inflammation-related proteins with EA to date.

循环炎症生物标志物与食管腺癌的风险:国防部血清库的巢式病例对照研究。
背景:我们之前确定了四种炎症相关的候选生物标志物与食管腺癌(EA)风险的关联:TNFR2、IL17A、VEGFR3和抵抗素。方法:我们的目标是复制这些候选蛋白,并发现与其他蛋白的新关联。我们对储存在美国国防部血清库的男性诊断前生物标本进行了巢式病例对照研究,包括203例EA事件病例。对照与病例按出生日期、种族、服务部门和抽血日期按2:1的比例进行匹配。多重免疫测定法(Olink/Proseek面板)检测了254种蛋白,在所有样品中检测到≥10%。多变量调整条件logistic回归模型计算了生物标志物分位数与EA p值之间的关联(结果:在4个候选患者中,TNFR2的最高类别与EA风险显著增加相关(ORQ4vsQ1=1.87, 95%置信区间:1.02-3.42)。在荟萃分析中,TNFR2与EA呈正相关(荟萃分析最高vs最低=2.04,1.12-2.95),IL17A与EA呈负相关(荟萃分析最高vs最低=0.53,0.26-0.80)。在另外250种蛋白中,45种与EA风险相关,6种(MCP3、IL6、TNFR1、HGF、TFF3和FURIN)在FDR校正后仍然显著。结论:我们证实了TNFR2和IL17A与EA风险的关联。此外,我们的研究扩大了与EA发展相关的蛋白质范围。影响:这是迄今为止对EA炎症相关蛋白的最大评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信