Positive impact of patient participation in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery on clinical and functional outcomes, rehabilitation and patient satisfaction.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Burak Çakar, Erdal Uzun, Wubulıkasımu Xıaokaıtı, Sebati Başer Canbaz, Ahmet Güney
{"title":"Positive impact of patient participation in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery on clinical and functional outcomes, rehabilitation and patient satisfaction.","authors":"Burak Çakar, Erdal Uzun, Wubulıkasımu Xıaokaıtı, Sebati Başer Canbaz, Ahmet Güney","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08480-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of patient participation on clinical and functional outcomes, satisfaction, and compliance with postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-one patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) were included. Thirty patients in the participation group were shown the arthroscopy screen and allowed to communicate with the surgeon during surgery. For clinical and functional evaluation, knee joint range of motion (ROM), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) score, and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), were used. The Pain Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess pain. Additionally, the patient's satisfaction and exercise compliance were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale and percentage of exercise participation, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3rd week, the ROM, SF-36, LKSS values, and pain scores were better in the participation group compared to the control group(p <.05). At 6th month, the IKDC, KOOS, SF-36 values and pain scores were also better in the participation group compared to the control group (p <.05). However, the ROM, LKSS, and TAS values were similar between groups at the 6th month(p >.05). Postop satisfaction at 3rd week and 6th month and exercise compliance postoperatively were significantly better in the participation group compared to the control group(p <.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient participation during ACLR surgery by communicating with the surgeon positively affects clinical and functional outcomes. It also contributes to patient satisfaction and compliance with the rehabilitation program postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not Applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08480-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of patient participation on clinical and functional outcomes, satisfaction, and compliance with postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

Methods: Sixty-one patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) were included. Thirty patients in the participation group were shown the arthroscopy screen and allowed to communicate with the surgeon during surgery. For clinical and functional evaluation, knee joint range of motion (ROM), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) score, and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), were used. The Pain Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess pain. Additionally, the patient's satisfaction and exercise compliance were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale and percentage of exercise participation, respectively.

Results: At 3rd week, the ROM, SF-36, LKSS values, and pain scores were better in the participation group compared to the control group(p <.05). At 6th month, the IKDC, KOOS, SF-36 values and pain scores were also better in the participation group compared to the control group (p <.05). However, the ROM, LKSS, and TAS values were similar between groups at the 6th month(p >.05). Postop satisfaction at 3rd week and 6th month and exercise compliance postoperatively were significantly better in the participation group compared to the control group(p <.05).

Conclusion: Patient participation during ACLR surgery by communicating with the surgeon positively affects clinical and functional outcomes. It also contributes to patient satisfaction and compliance with the rehabilitation program postoperatively.

Clinical trial number: Not Applicable.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信