Radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis and chromosomic aberrations for prediction of toxicities in patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for breast or prostate cancers.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
David Azria, Joanne S Haviland, Muriel Brengues, Clare Griffin, Jayne Moquet, Stephen Barnard, David P Dearnaley, Annie Gao, Lone Gothard, Kai Rothkamm, John R Yarnold
{"title":"Radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis and chromosomic aberrations for prediction of toxicities in patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for breast or prostate cancers.","authors":"David Azria, Joanne S Haviland, Muriel Brengues, Clare Griffin, Jayne Moquet, Stephen Barnard, David P Dearnaley, Annie Gao, Lone Gothard, Kai Rothkamm, John R Yarnold","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis (RILA) and chromosomal damage assays (CDA) assays are proposed predictors of radiotherapy (RT) adverse events (RTAE). This study evaluated RILA and CDA in patients undergoing different RT dose regimens for early breast (FAST trial) or prostate (CHHiP trial) cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients were recruited from each trial. Fresh heparinised blood samples were analyzed for RILA and CDA. The primary endpoint was time to first change in photographic breast appearance (FAST) or time to first grade ≥2 RTOG bladder or bowel toxicity (CHHiP). The secondary endpoint in FAST was breast fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dataset included 103 FAST and 297 CHHiP trial patients. No significant association of RILA with the primary endpoint was observed in the FAST trial. However, the risk of grade ≥2 breast fibrosis was lower in patients with RILA ≥24% compared to those with RILA ≤16% (p = 0.012). In the CHHiP trial, no significant associations were found between CDA after prostate radiotherapy outcomes. However, higher levels of micronuclei per cell were associated with a lower risk of grade ≥2 RTOG pelvic toxicities. The relative risk of developing grade ≥2 RTAE decreased for patients with RILA ≥ 24% but was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No association was found between RILA and photographic breast appearance. High RILA values were statistically associated with a lower risk of grade ≥2 breast fibrosis. In the CHHiP trial, most assays showed no association with pelvic toxicities.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>RILA is confirmed as a potential predictor of breast fibrosis regarding fraction sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis (RILA) and chromosomal damage assays (CDA) assays are proposed predictors of radiotherapy (RT) adverse events (RTAE). This study evaluated RILA and CDA in patients undergoing different RT dose regimens for early breast (FAST trial) or prostate (CHHiP trial) cancer.

Methods: Consecutive patients were recruited from each trial. Fresh heparinised blood samples were analyzed for RILA and CDA. The primary endpoint was time to first change in photographic breast appearance (FAST) or time to first grade ≥2 RTOG bladder or bowel toxicity (CHHiP). The secondary endpoint in FAST was breast fibrosis.

Results: The dataset included 103 FAST and 297 CHHiP trial patients. No significant association of RILA with the primary endpoint was observed in the FAST trial. However, the risk of grade ≥2 breast fibrosis was lower in patients with RILA ≥24% compared to those with RILA ≤16% (p = 0.012). In the CHHiP trial, no significant associations were found between CDA after prostate radiotherapy outcomes. However, higher levels of micronuclei per cell were associated with a lower risk of grade ≥2 RTOG pelvic toxicities. The relative risk of developing grade ≥2 RTAE decreased for patients with RILA ≥ 24% but was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: No association was found between RILA and photographic breast appearance. High RILA values were statistically associated with a lower risk of grade ≥2 breast fibrosis. In the CHHiP trial, most assays showed no association with pelvic toxicities.

Advances in knowledge: RILA is confirmed as a potential predictor of breast fibrosis regarding fraction sizes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信