Gingival thickness: effects on gingival wound healing.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kalia Theodorou, Ai Ni, Dimitris N Tatakis
{"title":"Gingival thickness: effects on gingival wound healing.","authors":"Kalia Theodorou, Ai Ni, Dimitris N Tatakis","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05593-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although available evidence indicates that gingival thickness may affect periodontal surgical outcomes, there are no studies on the effect of gingival thickness on gingival excisional wound healing. This prospective study aimed to assess the effect of gingival thickness on the healing of standardized experimental gingival wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy non-smokers with thick or thin gingiva were recruited. Standardized circular buccal gingival excisional wounds were created. Follow-up visits were conducted on postoperative day 3 (D3), 7 (D7), and 14 (D14). Healing Score Index (HSI) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> test were used to assess wound healing and epithelialization, respectively. Digital photographs were obtained to assess wound surface area. Patient-centered outcomes were assessed using custom and OHIP-14 questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six volunteers (24-36 years old) with thin/thick gingiva (n = 13 per group, age- and sex-matched) completed the study. HSI predictably increased from D3 to D14, without significant intergroup differences at any time point (p ≥ 0.99). Wound epithelialization was 0% on D3, 61-69% on D7, and 92-100% on D14, without significant intergroup differences at any time (p ≥ 0.99). Over 95% of the immediate postoperative wound area was closed by D14, without significant intergroup differences at any time (p ≥ 0.25). Although OHIP-14 scores did not differ significantly between groups (p ≥ 0.99), thin group reported more pain after the anesthesia wore off (day of the surgery; p = 0.0391).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of the present study, standardized buccal gingival wounds heal predictably within a short period of time, with no evidence that clinically determined gingival thickness has any effects on the wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05593-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although available evidence indicates that gingival thickness may affect periodontal surgical outcomes, there are no studies on the effect of gingival thickness on gingival excisional wound healing. This prospective study aimed to assess the effect of gingival thickness on the healing of standardized experimental gingival wounds.

Methods: Healthy non-smokers with thick or thin gingiva were recruited. Standardized circular buccal gingival excisional wounds were created. Follow-up visits were conducted on postoperative day 3 (D3), 7 (D7), and 14 (D14). Healing Score Index (HSI) and H2O2 test were used to assess wound healing and epithelialization, respectively. Digital photographs were obtained to assess wound surface area. Patient-centered outcomes were assessed using custom and OHIP-14 questionnaires.

Results: Twenty-six volunteers (24-36 years old) with thin/thick gingiva (n = 13 per group, age- and sex-matched) completed the study. HSI predictably increased from D3 to D14, without significant intergroup differences at any time point (p ≥ 0.99). Wound epithelialization was 0% on D3, 61-69% on D7, and 92-100% on D14, without significant intergroup differences at any time (p ≥ 0.99). Over 95% of the immediate postoperative wound area was closed by D14, without significant intergroup differences at any time (p ≥ 0.25). Although OHIP-14 scores did not differ significantly between groups (p ≥ 0.99), thin group reported more pain after the anesthesia wore off (day of the surgery; p = 0.0391).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, standardized buccal gingival wounds heal predictably within a short period of time, with no evidence that clinically determined gingival thickness has any effects on the wound healing.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信