Executive function performance in high and low medication adherent patients with euthymic bipolar i disorder: a comparative study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mona Rahimi Chahooei, Komeil Zahedi Tajrishi, Ghazaleh Zargarinejad, Amir Shabani
{"title":"Executive function performance in high and low medication adherent patients with euthymic bipolar i disorder: a comparative study.","authors":"Mona Rahimi Chahooei, Komeil Zahedi Tajrishi, Ghazaleh Zargarinejad, Amir Shabani","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06665-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medication nonadherence is a prevalent issue among patients with bipolar disorder, leading to substantial negative consequences. Despite documented cognitive deficits in this population, the relationship between executive dysfunction and medication nonadherence remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between executive functions and medication adherence in euthymic patients with bipolar I disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional, comparative study, we recruited 200 euthymic bipolar I disorder patients aged 18 to 55 years from the outpatient clinic of Iran Psychiatric Hospital in Tehran in 2024, using a convenience sampling method. The euthymic phase was confirmed using the Persian versions of the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Patients completed the Medication Adherence Rating Scale, along with a series of executive function tests including Go/No-Go, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Iowa Gambling Task. Multivariate analysis of covariance was employed to analyze the results, controlling for demographic and clinical variables as covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 54.5% had low medication adherence. Low adherent patients exhibited significantly poorer performance in Go/No-Go as indicated by higher commission errors (F [1] = 7.63, p = 0.006) as well as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, evidenced by a higher number of perseveration errors (F [1] = 8.61, p = 0.004) and fewer completed categories (F [1] = 6.67, p = 0.011), compared to high adherent patients. Notably, although differences in decision-making were observed between the two groups, these did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.139).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes a correlation between low medication adherence and deficits in executive functions-specifically response inhibition and cognitive flexibility-in patients with bipolar I disorder. Furthermore, even after controlling for covariates, the differences in executive functions between medication adherence groups remained significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06665-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medication nonadherence is a prevalent issue among patients with bipolar disorder, leading to substantial negative consequences. Despite documented cognitive deficits in this population, the relationship between executive dysfunction and medication nonadherence remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between executive functions and medication adherence in euthymic patients with bipolar I disorder.

Method: In this cross-sectional, comparative study, we recruited 200 euthymic bipolar I disorder patients aged 18 to 55 years from the outpatient clinic of Iran Psychiatric Hospital in Tehran in 2024, using a convenience sampling method. The euthymic phase was confirmed using the Persian versions of the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Patients completed the Medication Adherence Rating Scale, along with a series of executive function tests including Go/No-Go, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Iowa Gambling Task. Multivariate analysis of covariance was employed to analyze the results, controlling for demographic and clinical variables as covariates.

Results: Of the participants, 54.5% had low medication adherence. Low adherent patients exhibited significantly poorer performance in Go/No-Go as indicated by higher commission errors (F [1] = 7.63, p = 0.006) as well as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, evidenced by a higher number of perseveration errors (F [1] = 8.61, p = 0.004) and fewer completed categories (F [1] = 6.67, p = 0.011), compared to high adherent patients. Notably, although differences in decision-making were observed between the two groups, these did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.139).

Conclusions: This study establishes a correlation between low medication adherence and deficits in executive functions-specifically response inhibition and cognitive flexibility-in patients with bipolar I disorder. Furthermore, even after controlling for covariates, the differences in executive functions between medication adherence groups remained significant.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信