Ventricular Septal Rupture as a Complication of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Comparison of Different Treatment Methods.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zhongchun He, Zhaofei Wang, Bo Dong, Qiuxiang Long
{"title":"Ventricular Septal Rupture as a Complication of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Comparison of Different Treatment Methods.","authors":"Zhongchun He, Zhaofei Wang, Bo Dong, Qiuxiang Long","doi":"10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This research aimed to investigate the clinical features exhibited by individuals diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by ventricular septal rupture (VSR) and to compare the prognostic outcomes of different treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study on a cohort of 200 patients who were diagnosed with AMI complicated by VSR at a specialized medical facility from 2018 to 2023 was conducted. The patients were categorized into 3 different treatment groups: group A received medical management, group B underwent surgical repair, and group C underwent percutaneous device closure. Our primary objective was to assess the overall mortality rate within 1 year, while secondary objectives included evaluating in-hospital mortality, mortality within 30 days, and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A showed the highest in-hospital mortality rate of 37.3%. The rate for group B was only 20.6%, while group C exhibited the lowest rate of 17.4%. A similar tendency was observed for the 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. The 30-day mortality rate for group A, group B, and group C was 56.9%, 20.6%, and 22.1%, respectively. The 1-year mortality rate for group A, group B, and group C was as follows: 31.4%, 28.6%, and 25.6%. In addition, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year was highest in group A (56.9%), followed by group B (28.6%) and group C (32.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both surgical repair and percutaneous device closure were associated with significantly better survival outcomes compared to medical management alone in patients with AMI complicated by VSR.</p>","PeriodicalId":7835,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This research aimed to investigate the clinical features exhibited by individuals diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by ventricular septal rupture (VSR) and to compare the prognostic outcomes of different treatment modalities.

Methods: A retrospective study on a cohort of 200 patients who were diagnosed with AMI complicated by VSR at a specialized medical facility from 2018 to 2023 was conducted. The patients were categorized into 3 different treatment groups: group A received medical management, group B underwent surgical repair, and group C underwent percutaneous device closure. Our primary objective was to assess the overall mortality rate within 1 year, while secondary objectives included evaluating in-hospital mortality, mortality within 30 days, and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year.

Results: Group A showed the highest in-hospital mortality rate of 37.3%. The rate for group B was only 20.6%, while group C exhibited the lowest rate of 17.4%. A similar tendency was observed for the 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. The 30-day mortality rate for group A, group B, and group C was 56.9%, 20.6%, and 22.1%, respectively. The 1-year mortality rate for group A, group B, and group C was as follows: 31.4%, 28.6%, and 25.6%. In addition, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year was highest in group A (56.9%), followed by group B (28.6%) and group C (32.6%).

Conclusion: Both surgical repair and percutaneous device closure were associated with significantly better survival outcomes compared to medical management alone in patients with AMI complicated by VSR.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology is an international monthly periodical on cardiology published on independent, unbiased, double-blinded and peer-review principles. The journal’s publication language is English. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology aims to publish qualified and original clinical, experimental and basic research on cardiology at the international level. The journal’s scope also covers editorial comments, reviews of innovations in medical education and practice, case reports, original images, scientific letters, educational articles, letters to the editor, articles on publication ethics, diagnostic puzzles, and issues in social cardiology. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents, and general practitioners working in the fields of adult cardiology, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery and internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信