Acetic Acid-Indigo Carmine Chromocolonoscopy for Proximal Serrated Lesions: A Randomized, Three-Arm Colonoscopy Study.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hideaki Kinugasa, Sakiko Hiraoka, Sayo Kobayashi, Minoru Matsubara, Teruya Nagahara, Reiji Higashi, Kensuke Takei, Masayasu Ohmori, Takashi Nakamura, Takao Tsuzuki, Shouichi Tanaka, Ryosuke Hirai, Junki Toyosawa, Yuki Aoyama, Yasushi Yamasaki, Toshihiro Inokuchi, Masahiro Takahara, Takehiro Tanaka, Toshiharu Mitsuhashi, Motoyuki Otsuka
{"title":"Acetic Acid-Indigo Carmine Chromocolonoscopy for Proximal Serrated Lesions: A Randomized, Three-Arm Colonoscopy Study.","authors":"Hideaki Kinugasa, Sakiko Hiraoka, Sayo Kobayashi, Minoru Matsubara, Teruya Nagahara, Reiji Higashi, Kensuke Takei, Masayasu Ohmori, Takashi Nakamura, Takao Tsuzuki, Shouichi Tanaka, Ryosuke Hirai, Junki Toyosawa, Yuki Aoyama, Yasushi Yamasaki, Toshihiro Inokuchi, Masahiro Takahara, Takehiro Tanaka, Toshiharu Mitsuhashi, Motoyuki Otsuka","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Aggressive colorectal cancer (CRC) frequently originates from serrated lesions (SLs), particularly in the proximal colon, which are challenging to detect using standard screening colonoscopy. Although duplicate examinations or chromocolonoscopies are recommended for detecting proximal SLs, evidence from randomized trials is limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of tandem colonoscopy with an acetic acid-indigo carmine mixture (AIM) for detecting SLs in the proximal colon compared to white-light imaging (WLI) and indigo carmine (IC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This three-arm, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving nine institutions enrolled patients undergoing colonoscopy and assigned them randomly to the WLI, IC, or AIM group. The primary outcomes were the SL-detection rate (SDR) of proximal lesions during the second examination (SDR2nd) and SL additional rate (SAR). Secondary outcomes included the detection and additional rates of other polyps, factors contributing to SAR, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2021 and 2024, 1,319 participants with 1,267 polyps were included in the analysis. With AIM, the SDR2nd and SAR were significantly higher compared to WLI or IC (WLI vs. AIM: 2.7% vs. 14.0%, p<.001; IC vs. AIM: 7.9% vs. 14.0%, p=.002, and WLI vs. AIM: 22.4% vs. 69.3%, p<.001; IC vs. AIM: 45.8% vs. 69.3%, p=.001). AIM conferred a higher adenoma-detection rate (ADR)2nd than with WLI (10.5% vs. 24.7%; p<.001) and was an independent factor for SAR (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 7.79 [3.76-17.08]). No major adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AIM significantly improved proximal colon SDRs and outperformed WLI and IC. The relationship between SDR and CRC incidence warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Aggressive colorectal cancer (CRC) frequently originates from serrated lesions (SLs), particularly in the proximal colon, which are challenging to detect using standard screening colonoscopy. Although duplicate examinations or chromocolonoscopies are recommended for detecting proximal SLs, evidence from randomized trials is limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of tandem colonoscopy with an acetic acid-indigo carmine mixture (AIM) for detecting SLs in the proximal colon compared to white-light imaging (WLI) and indigo carmine (IC).

Methods: This three-arm, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving nine institutions enrolled patients undergoing colonoscopy and assigned them randomly to the WLI, IC, or AIM group. The primary outcomes were the SL-detection rate (SDR) of proximal lesions during the second examination (SDR2nd) and SL additional rate (SAR). Secondary outcomes included the detection and additional rates of other polyps, factors contributing to SAR, and complications.

Results: Between 2021 and 2024, 1,319 participants with 1,267 polyps were included in the analysis. With AIM, the SDR2nd and SAR were significantly higher compared to WLI or IC (WLI vs. AIM: 2.7% vs. 14.0%, p<.001; IC vs. AIM: 7.9% vs. 14.0%, p=.002, and WLI vs. AIM: 22.4% vs. 69.3%, p<.001; IC vs. AIM: 45.8% vs. 69.3%, p=.001). AIM conferred a higher adenoma-detection rate (ADR)2nd than with WLI (10.5% vs. 24.7%; p<.001) and was an independent factor for SAR (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 7.79 [3.76-17.08]). No major adverse events were observed.

Conclusions: AIM significantly improved proximal colon SDRs and outperformed WLI and IC. The relationship between SDR and CRC incidence warrants further investigation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信