Fecal Incontinence in Adults: New Therapies.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
John W Blackett, Adil E Bharucha
{"title":"Fecal Incontinence in Adults: New Therapies.","authors":"John W Blackett, Adil E Bharucha","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fecal incontinence (FI) is the involuntary and recurrent loss of stool. FI significantly affects both physical and social well-being, while imposing a substantial economic burden. The global prevalence of FI is approximately 8%. Risk factors include advanced age, diarrhea, anal sphincter damage from obstetric trauma or anorectal surgery, pelvic floor abnormalities (such as rectal prolapse), inflammatory bowel disease, and neurological conditions. Despite greater understanding of the impact of FI and advances in diagnostic techniques and treatment options, management remains inconsistent, likely due to limited awareness of available therapies. Patients often benefit from conservative treatments, including dietary modifications, fiber supplementation, antidiarrheal agents, and physical therapy, especially when these are tailored to specific symptoms and rigorously applied. Next level options include anorectal biofeedback therapy, the perianal injectable bulking agent dextranomer, or anal/vaginal barrier devices, which can be effective for patients if tolerated. Transanal irrigation may be considered for patients with neurogenic bowel and fecal retention to aid in rectal cleansing and prevent FI. Sacral neuromodulation is the preferred surgical treatment for FI. Noninvasive anal electrical and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation are not superior to placebo in controlled trials. Translumbosacral magnetic stimulation was beneficial in an uncontrolled trial; sham-controlled trials are necessary. Due to limited long-term efficacy, anal sphincteroplasty is typically reserved for younger patients with obstetric anal sphincter defects. Colostomy is considered a last resort. Injection of autologous muscle cells into the external anal sphincter has shown promise in small, uncontrolled trials, though has not yielded significant results in most controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003413","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fecal incontinence (FI) is the involuntary and recurrent loss of stool. FI significantly affects both physical and social well-being, while imposing a substantial economic burden. The global prevalence of FI is approximately 8%. Risk factors include advanced age, diarrhea, anal sphincter damage from obstetric trauma or anorectal surgery, pelvic floor abnormalities (such as rectal prolapse), inflammatory bowel disease, and neurological conditions. Despite greater understanding of the impact of FI and advances in diagnostic techniques and treatment options, management remains inconsistent, likely due to limited awareness of available therapies. Patients often benefit from conservative treatments, including dietary modifications, fiber supplementation, antidiarrheal agents, and physical therapy, especially when these are tailored to specific symptoms and rigorously applied. Next level options include anorectal biofeedback therapy, the perianal injectable bulking agent dextranomer, or anal/vaginal barrier devices, which can be effective for patients if tolerated. Transanal irrigation may be considered for patients with neurogenic bowel and fecal retention to aid in rectal cleansing and prevent FI. Sacral neuromodulation is the preferred surgical treatment for FI. Noninvasive anal electrical and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation are not superior to placebo in controlled trials. Translumbosacral magnetic stimulation was beneficial in an uncontrolled trial; sham-controlled trials are necessary. Due to limited long-term efficacy, anal sphincteroplasty is typically reserved for younger patients with obstetric anal sphincter defects. Colostomy is considered a last resort. Injection of autologous muscle cells into the external anal sphincter has shown promise in small, uncontrolled trials, though has not yielded significant results in most controlled trials.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信