Efficacy and Safety of Higher Doses of Levofloxacin for Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase II Clinical Trial.

IF 19.4 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Patrick P J Phillips, Charles A Peloquin, Timothy R Sterling, Pawandeep Kaur, Andreas H Diacon, Eduardo Gotuzzo, Debra Benator, Robin M Warren, David Sikes, Leonid Lecca, Neel R Gandhi, Elizabeth M Streicher, Nancy Dianis, Kathleen Eisenach, Carole D Mitnick, C Robert Horsburgh
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Higher Doses of Levofloxacin for Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase II Clinical Trial.","authors":"Patrick P J Phillips, Charles A Peloquin, Timothy R Sterling, Pawandeep Kaur, Andreas H Diacon, Eduardo Gotuzzo, Debra Benator, Robin M Warren, David Sikes, Leonid Lecca, Neel R Gandhi, Elizabeth M Streicher, Nancy Dianis, Kathleen Eisenach, Carole D Mitnick, C Robert Horsburgh","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202407-1354OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Evaluation of optimal dosing has generally been inadequate during tuberculosis (TB) drug development. Fluoroquinolones are central to TB treatment. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the dose of levofloxacin needed to achieve maximal efficacy and acceptable safety and tolerability as part of a multidrug TB regimen. <b>Methods:</b> Opti-Q was an international, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Eligible participants with TB resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin but susceptible to fluoroquinolones were randomized to receive one of four weight-adjusted once-daily doses of levofloxacin for 24 weeks (168 doses) alongside a multidrug regimen: 11 mg/kg (750 mg), 14 mg/kg (750 mg/1,000 mg), 17 mg/kg (1,000 mg/1,250 mg) or 20 mg/kg (1,250 mg/1,500 mg). The primary efficacy outcome was time to sputum culture conversion, and the primary safety outcome was grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> A total of 111 participants were randomized from three sites in South Africa and Peru. Eighty-three (75%) had cavities on chest X-ray, 55 (50%) had a smear grading of 3+, and the median body mass index was 20.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Median levofloxacin areas under the curve (AUCs)/minimum inhibitory concentrations were 573, 633, 918, and 1,343 across the four treatment arms. There was no difference in time to culture conversion on solid or liquid media by treatment arm (stratified log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.282), by tertile of AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (<i>P</i> = 0.350), or by dose received (<i>P</i> = 0.723); 69.3%, 74.8%, 70.6%, and 78.3% exhibited culture conversion after 8 weeks on solid media, respectively, across the treatment arms; along with 64.6%, 69.5%, 52.6%, and 69.6% on liquid culture. More participants experienced a grade 3-5 AE at higher doses (37.0% and 16.0% in the highest and lowest dose groups, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.042, Cochran-Armitage test for trend) and higher tertiles of AUC (<i>P</i> = 0.011). <b>Conclusions:</b> As part of a multidrug regimen, doses of levofloxacin >1,000 mg/d resulted in greater exposures and increased frequency of AEs but did not result in faster time to sputum culture conversion. A dose of 1,000 mg/d can achieve the target exposure in nearly all adults and was well tolerated. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01918397).</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1277-1287"},"PeriodicalIF":19.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202407-1354OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Evaluation of optimal dosing has generally been inadequate during tuberculosis (TB) drug development. Fluoroquinolones are central to TB treatment. Objective: To determine the dose of levofloxacin needed to achieve maximal efficacy and acceptable safety and tolerability as part of a multidrug TB regimen. Methods: Opti-Q was an international, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Eligible participants with TB resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin but susceptible to fluoroquinolones were randomized to receive one of four weight-adjusted once-daily doses of levofloxacin for 24 weeks (168 doses) alongside a multidrug regimen: 11 mg/kg (750 mg), 14 mg/kg (750 mg/1,000 mg), 17 mg/kg (1,000 mg/1,250 mg) or 20 mg/kg (1,250 mg/1,500 mg). The primary efficacy outcome was time to sputum culture conversion, and the primary safety outcome was grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). Measurements and Main Results: A total of 111 participants were randomized from three sites in South Africa and Peru. Eighty-three (75%) had cavities on chest X-ray, 55 (50%) had a smear grading of 3+, and the median body mass index was 20.4 kg/m2. Median levofloxacin areas under the curve (AUCs)/minimum inhibitory concentrations were 573, 633, 918, and 1,343 across the four treatment arms. There was no difference in time to culture conversion on solid or liquid media by treatment arm (stratified log-rank P = 0.282), by tertile of AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (P = 0.350), or by dose received (P = 0.723); 69.3%, 74.8%, 70.6%, and 78.3% exhibited culture conversion after 8 weeks on solid media, respectively, across the treatment arms; along with 64.6%, 69.5%, 52.6%, and 69.6% on liquid culture. More participants experienced a grade 3-5 AE at higher doses (37.0% and 16.0% in the highest and lowest dose groups, respectively; P = 0.042, Cochran-Armitage test for trend) and higher tertiles of AUC (P = 0.011). Conclusions: As part of a multidrug regimen, doses of levofloxacin >1,000 mg/d resulted in greater exposures and increased frequency of AEs but did not result in faster time to sputum culture conversion. A dose of 1,000 mg/d can achieve the target exposure in nearly all adults and was well tolerated. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01918397).

高剂量左氧氟沙星治疗耐药结核病的疗效和安全性:随机安慰剂对照 2 期试验。
背景:在结核病药物开发过程中,对最佳剂量的评估通常是不充分的。氟喹诺酮类药物是结核病治疗的核心。我们的目的是确定作为多药结核病治疗方案的一部分,达到最大疗效、可接受的安全性和耐受性所需的左氧氟沙星剂量。方法:Opti-Q是一项国际、多中心、随机、安慰剂对照的II期试验。对异烟肼和利福平耐药但对氟喹诺酮类药物(耐多药结核病)敏感的结核病患者随机接受四种体重调整剂量的左氧氟沙星之一,持续24周(168剂):11mg/kg(750mg)、14mg/kg(750mg/1000mg)、17mg /kg(1000mg/1250mg)或20mg/kg(1250mg/1500mg),同时采用多药方案。主要疗效指标为痰培养转化时间,主要安全性指标为3级或以上不良事件。研究结果:111名参与者随机来自南非和秘鲁的三个地点,83名(75%)胸部x线显示有空腔,55名(50%)涂片分级为3+,中位BMI为20.4 kg/m2。四个治疗组的中位左氧氟沙星AUC/MIC分别为573,633,918和1343。处理组(分层对数秩p=0.282)、AUC/MIC的分位数(p=0.350)或接受剂量(p=0.723)在固体或液体培养基上的培养转化时间没有差异;在固体培养基上培养8周后,各处理组的培养转化率分别为69.3%、74.8%、70.6%和78.3%;分别为64.6%、69.5%、52.6%、69.6%。从剂量(最高和最低剂量组分别为37.0%和16.0%,p=0.042, Cochran-Armitage检验趋势)和AUC的分位数(p=0.011)来看,更多的参与者经历了3-5级不良事件。解释:作为多药方案的一部分,超过1000mg的左氧氟沙星剂量会导致更大的暴露和不良事件的频率增加,但不会导致更快的痰培养转化时间。在几乎所有成年人中,每天1000mg的剂量可以达到目标暴露量,并且耐受性良好。临床试验注册可在www.Clinicaltrials: gov, ID: NCT01918397。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信