Motivated to Be Policy Entrepreneurs: The Changing Political Climate and Expert Involvement in China's Policy Process

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Zhipeng Ye, Zelin Xue
{"title":"Motivated to Be Policy Entrepreneurs: The Changing Political Climate and Expert Involvement in China's Policy Process","authors":"Zhipeng Ye,&nbsp;Zelin Xue","doi":"10.1111/gove.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Expert involvement in China's policy process has grown significantly since 2012, while the evolving motivations driving experts to act as policy entrepreneurs have received limited attention in the literature. This article examines how the changing political climate steers the rising involvement of experts in China's internal consultative information system. Through qualitative analysis of participatory observation and interviews, we find that the Communist Party of China’s (CPC) political reforms since 2012 have reconstructed the organizational incentive structure of government-funded research institutes, extrinsically motivating experts to write <i>zhuanbao</i> (专报, internal reports) for consultative services to the Party-state. Experts seek to enhance their writing skills and innovate strategies due to mixed intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, including financial rewards, career prospects, and professional reputations. This study contributes to the literature on policy entrepreneurship by introducing the concept of “extrinsically motivated policy entrepreneurship” and highlighting the role of top-down political pressure in shaping policy entrepreneur emergence in non-Western contexts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48056,"journal":{"name":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.70011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Expert involvement in China's policy process has grown significantly since 2012, while the evolving motivations driving experts to act as policy entrepreneurs have received limited attention in the literature. This article examines how the changing political climate steers the rising involvement of experts in China's internal consultative information system. Through qualitative analysis of participatory observation and interviews, we find that the Communist Party of China’s (CPC) political reforms since 2012 have reconstructed the organizational incentive structure of government-funded research institutes, extrinsically motivating experts to write zhuanbao (专报, internal reports) for consultative services to the Party-state. Experts seek to enhance their writing skills and innovate strategies due to mixed intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, including financial rewards, career prospects, and professional reputations. This study contributes to the literature on policy entrepreneurship by introducing the concept of “extrinsically motivated policy entrepreneurship” and highlighting the role of top-down political pressure in shaping policy entrepreneur emergence in non-Western contexts.

成为政策企业家的动力:中国政策过程中的政治气候变化与专家参与
自2012年以来,专家对中国政策过程的参与显著增加,而推动专家充当政策企业家的不断变化的动机在文献中受到的关注有限。本文考察了不断变化的政治气候如何引导专家越来越多地参与中国的内部咨询信息系统。通过参与式观察和访谈的定性分析,我们发现,2012年以来中国共产党的政治改革重构了政府资助的研究机构的组织激励结构,从外部激励专家为党国提供咨询服务撰写转报。由于内在和外在的动机,包括经济奖励、职业前景和职业声誉,专家们寻求提高他们的写作技巧和创新策略。本研究通过引入“外部激励政策企业家精神”的概念,并强调了自上而下的政治压力在非西方背景下形成政策企业家的作用,为政策企业家精神的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Governance provides a forum for the theoretical and practical discussion of executive politics, public policy, administration, and the organization of the state. Published in association with International Political Science Association''s Research Committee on the Structure & Organization of Government (SOG), it emphasizes peer-reviewed articles that take an international or comparative approach to public policy and administration. All papers, regardless of empirical focus, should have wider theoretical, comparative, or practical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信