Quantitative Analysis of Pork Adulteration in Beef by Double Antibody Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Combined With Mathematical Models

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jing Zhang, Yujing Li, Jingjing Liu, Yan Zhang, Yan Zhang, Hejie Li, Chunsheng Li
{"title":"Quantitative Analysis of Pork Adulteration in Beef by Double Antibody Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Combined With Mathematical Models","authors":"Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Yujing Li,&nbsp;Jingjing Liu,&nbsp;Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Hejie Li,&nbsp;Chunsheng Li","doi":"10.1155/jfq/6363488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Adulterating pork into other meat is a global concern, and efficient methods for identifying meat species are of prime importance in quality assurance and regulation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is one of the most widely used methodologies for porcine speciation. Thermostable proteins were used as suitable marker proteins for species identification in heat-processed or commercial meat products. However, the continuous pursuit of higher sensitivity narrowed the analytical range of quantitation (ROQ) resulting in reduced resolution. In our study, murine monoclonal antibodies (sTn-4C10 and sTn-4B1-HRP) which are specific to skeletal muscle troponin were used as capture antibodies and detection antibodies in a double antibody sandwich ELISA (DAS–ELISA) to measure the percentage of pork in beef. When the optimal loading concentrations of sTn-4C10, sTn-4B1-HRP, and adulterated samples were set as 2, 0.2, and 20 μg/mL, respectively, this DAS–ELISA assay combined with the optimal mathematical model had an analytical ROQ of 5.79%–91.33% (<i>w</i>/<i>w</i>) in the absence of beef. The recovery rates ranged from 96% to 100%, and the coefficient of variation was below 4.5% within the ROQ. This work has widened the analytical ROQ and improved the detection resolution.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Quality","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jfq/6363488","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Quality","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jfq/6363488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adulterating pork into other meat is a global concern, and efficient methods for identifying meat species are of prime importance in quality assurance and regulation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is one of the most widely used methodologies for porcine speciation. Thermostable proteins were used as suitable marker proteins for species identification in heat-processed or commercial meat products. However, the continuous pursuit of higher sensitivity narrowed the analytical range of quantitation (ROQ) resulting in reduced resolution. In our study, murine monoclonal antibodies (sTn-4C10 and sTn-4B1-HRP) which are specific to skeletal muscle troponin were used as capture antibodies and detection antibodies in a double antibody sandwich ELISA (DAS–ELISA) to measure the percentage of pork in beef. When the optimal loading concentrations of sTn-4C10, sTn-4B1-HRP, and adulterated samples were set as 2, 0.2, and 20 μg/mL, respectively, this DAS–ELISA assay combined with the optimal mathematical model had an analytical ROQ of 5.79%–91.33% (w/w) in the absence of beef. The recovery rates ranged from 96% to 100%, and the coefficient of variation was below 4.5% within the ROQ. This work has widened the analytical ROQ and improved the detection resolution.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Quality
Journal of Food Quality 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Food Quality is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles related to all aspects of food quality characteristics acceptable to consumers. The journal aims to provide a valuable resource for food scientists, nutritionists, food producers, the public health sector, and governmental and non-governmental agencies with an interest in food quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信