A strength-based clogging risk assessment strategy for mechanized tunneling

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Hanbiao Zhu, Shuying Wang, Pengfei Liu, Huanhuan Feng, Tongming Qu, Hemei Sun, Di Yan
{"title":"A strength-based clogging risk assessment strategy for mechanized tunneling","authors":"Hanbiao Zhu,&nbsp;Shuying Wang,&nbsp;Pengfei Liu,&nbsp;Huanhuan Feng,&nbsp;Tongming Qu,&nbsp;Hemei Sun,&nbsp;Di Yan","doi":"10.1007/s10064-025-04198-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The adhesion strength of muck is a crucial factor influencing Earth Pressure Balance (EPB) shield clogging, but this perspective overlooks the role of muck’s shear strength. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehensively evaluate the risk of shield clogging based on muck strength. Adhesion strength and triaxial tests were conducted on the moderately weathered mudstone muck using a rotary shear apparatus and a soil-shape-controlled triaxial device. This work explores the relationship between tangential adhesion strength (referred to as adhesion strength) and shear strength of moderately weathered mudstone muck. The adhesion strength and the shear strength exhibited similar variation patterns. As the consistency index increased, the adhesion strength of the muck gradually rose. The interfacial friction angle increased, while the interfacial adhesion force initially rose before declining. The adhesion and shear strengths of muck can be assessed by integrating the effects of stratigraphic stress. When the adhesion strength surpasses the shear strength, the shield faces a risk of muck adhesion. Building on this insight, a strength-based clogging risk assessment strategy for mechanized tunneling was proposed. Field tests demonstrated that the risk assessment strategy effectively evaluated the potential for shield clogging both before and after dispersant treatment, thereby ensuring the safety and efficiency of shield tunneling. Moreover, recognizing the influence of temperature, consolidation, and critical shear strength on the potential for shield clogging, the authors will continue to focus on these factors in future work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"84 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04198-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adhesion strength of muck is a crucial factor influencing Earth Pressure Balance (EPB) shield clogging, but this perspective overlooks the role of muck’s shear strength. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehensively evaluate the risk of shield clogging based on muck strength. Adhesion strength and triaxial tests were conducted on the moderately weathered mudstone muck using a rotary shear apparatus and a soil-shape-controlled triaxial device. This work explores the relationship between tangential adhesion strength (referred to as adhesion strength) and shear strength of moderately weathered mudstone muck. The adhesion strength and the shear strength exhibited similar variation patterns. As the consistency index increased, the adhesion strength of the muck gradually rose. The interfacial friction angle increased, while the interfacial adhesion force initially rose before declining. The adhesion and shear strengths of muck can be assessed by integrating the effects of stratigraphic stress. When the adhesion strength surpasses the shear strength, the shield faces a risk of muck adhesion. Building on this insight, a strength-based clogging risk assessment strategy for mechanized tunneling was proposed. Field tests demonstrated that the risk assessment strategy effectively evaluated the potential for shield clogging both before and after dispersant treatment, thereby ensuring the safety and efficiency of shield tunneling. Moreover, recognizing the influence of temperature, consolidation, and critical shear strength on the potential for shield clogging, the authors will continue to focus on these factors in future work.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
445
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces: • the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations; • the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change; • the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses; • the prediction of changes to the above properties with time; • the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信