The ED95 of lidocaine and prilocaine for ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks for surgical anaesthesia: a randomised controlled clinical trial

Anurag Vats , Pawan K. Gupta , Andrew Berrill , Sarah Zohar , Philip M. Hopkins
{"title":"The ED95 of lidocaine and prilocaine for ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks for surgical anaesthesia: a randomised controlled clinical trial","authors":"Anurag Vats ,&nbsp;Pawan K. Gupta ,&nbsp;Andrew Berrill ,&nbsp;Sarah Zohar ,&nbsp;Philip M. Hopkins","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Our trial addresses the gaps in the current literature by directly estimating the ED<sub>95</sub> of short-acting local anaesthetics for ultrasound-guided axillary and supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks for surgical anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four double-blind prospective studies were organized in two separate arms. Patients were randomised between studies A (lidocaine 1% with adrenaline) and B (lidocaine 2% with adrenaline) for axillary blocks and between studies C (prilocaine 1%) and D (lidocaine 1% with adrenaline) for supraclavicular blocks. All statistical modelling and analysis were performed using the modified continual reassessment method. The primary endpoint of the studies was the loss of cold and pin-prick sensations in the sensory distributions of the median, musculocutaneous, radial, and ulnar nerves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For axillary blocks, the estimated ED<sub>95</sub> of lidocaine 1% with adrenaline was 40 ml (95% credibility interval: 89.5–99.2%), and lidocaine 2% with adrenaline was 15 ml (95% credibility interval: 87.4–97.5%) (studies A and B: 41 and 40 patients, respectively). The ED<sub>95</sub> could not be determined for supraclavicular blocks as it fell outside the dose range considered in the studies (studies C and D: 31 and 42 patients, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We achieved a 95% success rate for axillary blocks using lidocaine (1% and 2%) with adrenaline within our dosing limits. For supraclavicular blocks, &gt;40 ml of prilocaine 1% or lidocaine 1% with adrenaline may be required to consistently achieve a 95% success rate. Our studies highlight the continual reassessment method as a credible methodology for dose-finding studies in regional anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>EudraCT ref: 2010-018466-22.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609625000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Our trial addresses the gaps in the current literature by directly estimating the ED95 of short-acting local anaesthetics for ultrasound-guided axillary and supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks for surgical anaesthesia.

Methods

Four double-blind prospective studies were organized in two separate arms. Patients were randomised between studies A (lidocaine 1% with adrenaline) and B (lidocaine 2% with adrenaline) for axillary blocks and between studies C (prilocaine 1%) and D (lidocaine 1% with adrenaline) for supraclavicular blocks. All statistical modelling and analysis were performed using the modified continual reassessment method. The primary endpoint of the studies was the loss of cold and pin-prick sensations in the sensory distributions of the median, musculocutaneous, radial, and ulnar nerves.

Results

For axillary blocks, the estimated ED95 of lidocaine 1% with adrenaline was 40 ml (95% credibility interval: 89.5–99.2%), and lidocaine 2% with adrenaline was 15 ml (95% credibility interval: 87.4–97.5%) (studies A and B: 41 and 40 patients, respectively). The ED95 could not be determined for supraclavicular blocks as it fell outside the dose range considered in the studies (studies C and D: 31 and 42 patients, respectively).

Conclusions

We achieved a 95% success rate for axillary blocks using lidocaine (1% and 2%) with adrenaline within our dosing limits. For supraclavicular blocks, >40 ml of prilocaine 1% or lidocaine 1% with adrenaline may be required to consistently achieve a 95% success rate. Our studies highlight the continual reassessment method as a credible methodology for dose-finding studies in regional anaesthesia.

Clinical trial registration

EudraCT ref: 2010-018466-22.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信