The effectiveness of renewable energy technology under the EKC hypothesis and the impact of fossil and nuclear energy investments on the UK's Ecological Footprint

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Sefa Özbek , Mustafa Naimoğlu
{"title":"The effectiveness of renewable energy technology under the EKC hypothesis and the impact of fossil and nuclear energy investments on the UK's Ecological Footprint","authors":"Sefa Özbek ,&nbsp;Mustafa Naimoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.135351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses a critical gap in the literature by analyzing the environmental impact of renewable energy R&amp;D effectiveness alongside other energy-related R&amp;D investments, which has been largely neglected. Focusing on the UK from 1990 to 2022, the research examines the role of R&amp;D in renewable energy, fossil fuels, nuclear energy, and GDP in driving the Ecological Footprint (EF). While previous studies on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) have rarely incorporated energy-related R&amp;D, this study emphasizes that increasing renewable energy use, relative to R&amp;D effectiveness, is key to understanding its environmental benefits. Using advanced econometric techniques such as Fourier Engle-Granger and Fourier ADL cointegration tests, FMOLS, CCR, and DOLS estimators, the findings reveal that enhanced renewable energy R&amp;D significantly reduces EF, while fossil fuel and nuclear energy R&amp;D investments also contribute to environmental mitigation. Additionally, GDP shows a long-term negative relationship with EF, aligning with the EKC hypothesis, though its short-term effect on environmental quality is limited. By highlighting the underexplored role of energy R&amp;D, this study provides critical insights for policymakers seeking to balance economic growth with environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 135351"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225009934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses a critical gap in the literature by analyzing the environmental impact of renewable energy R&D effectiveness alongside other energy-related R&D investments, which has been largely neglected. Focusing on the UK from 1990 to 2022, the research examines the role of R&D in renewable energy, fossil fuels, nuclear energy, and GDP in driving the Ecological Footprint (EF). While previous studies on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) have rarely incorporated energy-related R&D, this study emphasizes that increasing renewable energy use, relative to R&D effectiveness, is key to understanding its environmental benefits. Using advanced econometric techniques such as Fourier Engle-Granger and Fourier ADL cointegration tests, FMOLS, CCR, and DOLS estimators, the findings reveal that enhanced renewable energy R&D significantly reduces EF, while fossil fuel and nuclear energy R&D investments also contribute to environmental mitigation. Additionally, GDP shows a long-term negative relationship with EF, aligning with the EKC hypothesis, though its short-term effect on environmental quality is limited. By highlighting the underexplored role of energy R&D, this study provides critical insights for policymakers seeking to balance economic growth with environmental sustainability.
EKC 假设下可再生能源技术的有效性以及化石能源和核能投资对英国生态足迹的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信