The Effect of Arm Abduction and Forearm Muscle Activation on Kinematics During Elbow Flexion

Q3 Medicine
Tyler J. Wilps MD , Robert A. Kaufmann MD , James W. Gorenflo MS , Satoshi Yamakawa PhD , Richard E. Debski PhD
{"title":"The Effect of Arm Abduction and Forearm Muscle Activation on Kinematics During Elbow Flexion","authors":"Tyler J. Wilps MD ,&nbsp;Robert A. Kaufmann MD ,&nbsp;James W. Gorenflo MS ,&nbsp;Satoshi Yamakawa PhD ,&nbsp;Richard E. Debski PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>As the elbow flexes with the arm at the side (0° humerothoracic abduction, HTA), it loses its valgus carrying angle. When the arm is abducted to 90° HTA, a varus torque tensions the lateral ligaments. Our purpose was to quantify the effect of abduction on elbow kinematics during active motion and the effect of lateral forearm muscle activation. We hypothesized that arm abduction would increase elbow varus angulation throughout flexion, and lateral forearm muscle activation would decrease varus angulation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A dynamic elbow testing apparatus was employed in six human cadaver arms at two levels of arm abduction, 0° and 90° HTA. Six electromechanical actuators simulated muscle action, whereas joint position was measured to quantify the relationship between the forearm and humerus as the elbow was actively flexed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All elbows maintained greater varus angle with the arm at 90° HTA compared with 0° HTA, significant at 60° flexion, 4.3° versus 3.4°, 90° flexion, 8.0° versus 6.8°, and 120° flexion, 10.5° versus 8.9°. The abducted elbow demonstrated less varus angle when the lateral stabilizers were activated. A significant difference was found at 30° flexion, 0.9 versus 1.5, 60° flexion, 3.8 versus 4.3, and 90° flexion, 7.6 versus 8.0.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Elbow joint coronal plane kinematics were influenced by abduction of the arm to 90° HTA, and greater elbow varus angles were found throughout flexion when compared with the arm at side position (0° HTA). In addition, activation of lateral forearm muscles (90° HTA + Lat Stab) decreased elbow varus angulation throughout flexion.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>Understanding the effect of varus torque on elbow biomechanics and the degree to which these effects are countered through dynamic stabilization may assist in arthroplasty and ligamentous reconstruction designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 146-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124002263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

As the elbow flexes with the arm at the side (0° humerothoracic abduction, HTA), it loses its valgus carrying angle. When the arm is abducted to 90° HTA, a varus torque tensions the lateral ligaments. Our purpose was to quantify the effect of abduction on elbow kinematics during active motion and the effect of lateral forearm muscle activation. We hypothesized that arm abduction would increase elbow varus angulation throughout flexion, and lateral forearm muscle activation would decrease varus angulation.

Methods

A dynamic elbow testing apparatus was employed in six human cadaver arms at two levels of arm abduction, 0° and 90° HTA. Six electromechanical actuators simulated muscle action, whereas joint position was measured to quantify the relationship between the forearm and humerus as the elbow was actively flexed.

Results

All elbows maintained greater varus angle with the arm at 90° HTA compared with 0° HTA, significant at 60° flexion, 4.3° versus 3.4°, 90° flexion, 8.0° versus 6.8°, and 120° flexion, 10.5° versus 8.9°. The abducted elbow demonstrated less varus angle when the lateral stabilizers were activated. A significant difference was found at 30° flexion, 0.9 versus 1.5, 60° flexion, 3.8 versus 4.3, and 90° flexion, 7.6 versus 8.0.

Conclusions

Elbow joint coronal plane kinematics were influenced by abduction of the arm to 90° HTA, and greater elbow varus angles were found throughout flexion when compared with the arm at side position (0° HTA). In addition, activation of lateral forearm muscles (90° HTA + Lat Stab) decreased elbow varus angulation throughout flexion.

Clinical relevance

Understanding the effect of varus torque on elbow biomechanics and the degree to which these effects are countered through dynamic stabilization may assist in arthroplasty and ligamentous reconstruction designs.
手臂外展和前臂肌肉激活对肘关节屈曲运动的影响
目的当肘关节侧屈(0°肱骨胸外展,HTA)时,肘关节失去外翻承载角。当手臂外展至90°HTA时,内翻扭矩使外侧韧带紧张。我们的目的是量化主动运动时外展对肘关节运动学的影响以及前臂外侧肌肉激活的影响。我们假设手臂外展会在整个屈曲过程中增加肘关节内翻角,而前臂外侧肌肉激活会减少肘关节内翻角。方法采用动态肘关节测定仪对6具尸体手臂0°和90°外展臂进行测试。六个机电致动器模拟肌肉运动,而关节位置被测量以量化肘关节主动屈曲时前臂和肱骨之间的关系。结果与0°HTA相比,所有肘关节在90°HTA处与手臂保持更大的内翻角,在60°屈曲(4.3°vs 3.4°)、90°屈曲(8.0°vs 6.8°)和120°屈曲(10.5°vs 8.9°)时均显著。激活外侧稳定器后,外展肘关节内翻角度减小。在30°屈曲时,0.9 vs 1.5, 60°屈曲时,3.8 vs 4.3, 90°屈曲时,7.6 vs 8.0。结论臂外展至90°HTA时,肘关节冠状面运动学受到影响,与臂侧位(0°HTA)相比,整个屈曲过程中肘关节内翻角度更大。此外,激活前臂外侧肌肉(90°HTA + Lat Stab)可降低肘关节内翻角度。了解内翻扭矩对肘关节生物力学的影响以及通过动态稳定来抵消这些影响的程度可能有助于关节置换术和韧带重建设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信