Tyler J. Wilps MD , Robert A. Kaufmann MD , James W. Gorenflo MS , Satoshi Yamakawa PhD , Richard E. Debski PhD
{"title":"The Effect of Arm Abduction and Forearm Muscle Activation on Kinematics During Elbow Flexion","authors":"Tyler J. Wilps MD , Robert A. Kaufmann MD , James W. Gorenflo MS , Satoshi Yamakawa PhD , Richard E. Debski PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>As the elbow flexes with the arm at the side (0° humerothoracic abduction, HTA), it loses its valgus carrying angle. When the arm is abducted to 90° HTA, a varus torque tensions the lateral ligaments. Our purpose was to quantify the effect of abduction on elbow kinematics during active motion and the effect of lateral forearm muscle activation. We hypothesized that arm abduction would increase elbow varus angulation throughout flexion, and lateral forearm muscle activation would decrease varus angulation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A dynamic elbow testing apparatus was employed in six human cadaver arms at two levels of arm abduction, 0° and 90° HTA. Six electromechanical actuators simulated muscle action, whereas joint position was measured to quantify the relationship between the forearm and humerus as the elbow was actively flexed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All elbows maintained greater varus angle with the arm at 90° HTA compared with 0° HTA, significant at 60° flexion, 4.3° versus 3.4°, 90° flexion, 8.0° versus 6.8°, and 120° flexion, 10.5° versus 8.9°. The abducted elbow demonstrated less varus angle when the lateral stabilizers were activated. A significant difference was found at 30° flexion, 0.9 versus 1.5, 60° flexion, 3.8 versus 4.3, and 90° flexion, 7.6 versus 8.0.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Elbow joint coronal plane kinematics were influenced by abduction of the arm to 90° HTA, and greater elbow varus angles were found throughout flexion when compared with the arm at side position (0° HTA). In addition, activation of lateral forearm muscles (90° HTA + Lat Stab) decreased elbow varus angulation throughout flexion.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>Understanding the effect of varus torque on elbow biomechanics and the degree to which these effects are countered through dynamic stabilization may assist in arthroplasty and ligamentous reconstruction designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 146-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124002263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
As the elbow flexes with the arm at the side (0° humerothoracic abduction, HTA), it loses its valgus carrying angle. When the arm is abducted to 90° HTA, a varus torque tensions the lateral ligaments. Our purpose was to quantify the effect of abduction on elbow kinematics during active motion and the effect of lateral forearm muscle activation. We hypothesized that arm abduction would increase elbow varus angulation throughout flexion, and lateral forearm muscle activation would decrease varus angulation.
Methods
A dynamic elbow testing apparatus was employed in six human cadaver arms at two levels of arm abduction, 0° and 90° HTA. Six electromechanical actuators simulated muscle action, whereas joint position was measured to quantify the relationship between the forearm and humerus as the elbow was actively flexed.
Results
All elbows maintained greater varus angle with the arm at 90° HTA compared with 0° HTA, significant at 60° flexion, 4.3° versus 3.4°, 90° flexion, 8.0° versus 6.8°, and 120° flexion, 10.5° versus 8.9°. The abducted elbow demonstrated less varus angle when the lateral stabilizers were activated. A significant difference was found at 30° flexion, 0.9 versus 1.5, 60° flexion, 3.8 versus 4.3, and 90° flexion, 7.6 versus 8.0.
Conclusions
Elbow joint coronal plane kinematics were influenced by abduction of the arm to 90° HTA, and greater elbow varus angles were found throughout flexion when compared with the arm at side position (0° HTA). In addition, activation of lateral forearm muscles (90° HTA + Lat Stab) decreased elbow varus angulation throughout flexion.
Clinical relevance
Understanding the effect of varus torque on elbow biomechanics and the degree to which these effects are countered through dynamic stabilization may assist in arthroplasty and ligamentous reconstruction designs.
目的当肘关节侧屈(0°肱骨胸外展,HTA)时,肘关节失去外翻承载角。当手臂外展至90°HTA时,内翻扭矩使外侧韧带紧张。我们的目的是量化主动运动时外展对肘关节运动学的影响以及前臂外侧肌肉激活的影响。我们假设手臂外展会在整个屈曲过程中增加肘关节内翻角,而前臂外侧肌肉激活会减少肘关节内翻角。方法采用动态肘关节测定仪对6具尸体手臂0°和90°外展臂进行测试。六个机电致动器模拟肌肉运动,而关节位置被测量以量化肘关节主动屈曲时前臂和肱骨之间的关系。结果与0°HTA相比,所有肘关节在90°HTA处与手臂保持更大的内翻角,在60°屈曲(4.3°vs 3.4°)、90°屈曲(8.0°vs 6.8°)和120°屈曲(10.5°vs 8.9°)时均显著。激活外侧稳定器后,外展肘关节内翻角度减小。在30°屈曲时,0.9 vs 1.5, 60°屈曲时,3.8 vs 4.3, 90°屈曲时,7.6 vs 8.0。结论臂外展至90°HTA时,肘关节冠状面运动学受到影响,与臂侧位(0°HTA)相比,整个屈曲过程中肘关节内翻角度更大。此外,激活前臂外侧肌肉(90°HTA + Lat Stab)可降低肘关节内翻角度。了解内翻扭矩对肘关节生物力学的影响以及通过动态稳定来抵消这些影响的程度可能有助于关节置换术和韧带重建设计。