{"title":"A binary grasshopper optimization algorithm for solving uncapacitated facility location problem","authors":"Ahmet Babalik, Aybuke Babadag","doi":"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Uncapacitated Facility Location Problem (UFLP) is a real-world binary optimization problem that aims to find the number of facilities to open, minimizing the total cost of exchange between customers and facilities, as well as the opening costs of these facilities. UFLP is classified as an NP-Hard problem. Metaheuristic methods are often preferred to solve UFLP due to their ability to find acceptable solutions in a reasonable time and its NP-Hard characteristics. Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) is a continuous metaheursitics optimization algorithm. In the literature, although some binary versions of the GOA algorithm have been used to solve problems such as feature selection, knapsack, scheduling and cluster covering, its performance analysis has not been conducted on UFLP which is pure binary optimization problem. In this study, a novel binary version of the GOA integrated with a novel binarization procedure is proposed for solving the UFLP. In the binarization procedure, a probability-based update strategy has been developed for generating new candidate solutions. This approach ensures the probability of determining the effect of the global best solution on the candidate solution. Besides, during the population update phase, there are two different mechanisms to update the global best solution and other grasshoppers. To enhance diversity in the grasshopper population, an α parameter has been integrated into the original algorithm. It was aimed to improve the quality of the candidate solutions by the integration of the α parameter. The performance of the proposed algorithm is assessed on the CAP and M* datasets. The obtained GAP values for the CAP 71-CAP A, CAP B, and CAP C problems are 0, 0.14, and 0.18, respectively. The GAP is 0 for the MO1-MO5, MP2, MP3, and MQ1-MQ3 problems, and GAP ≤ 0.24 for the remaining problems. The results were compared with other state-of-the-art binary optimization algorithms. The experimental results show that the proposed method is superior to the other compared algorithms and is an effective algorithm for solving UFLPs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48609,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102031"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625000862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Uncapacitated Facility Location Problem (UFLP) is a real-world binary optimization problem that aims to find the number of facilities to open, minimizing the total cost of exchange between customers and facilities, as well as the opening costs of these facilities. UFLP is classified as an NP-Hard problem. Metaheuristic methods are often preferred to solve UFLP due to their ability to find acceptable solutions in a reasonable time and its NP-Hard characteristics. Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) is a continuous metaheursitics optimization algorithm. In the literature, although some binary versions of the GOA algorithm have been used to solve problems such as feature selection, knapsack, scheduling and cluster covering, its performance analysis has not been conducted on UFLP which is pure binary optimization problem. In this study, a novel binary version of the GOA integrated with a novel binarization procedure is proposed for solving the UFLP. In the binarization procedure, a probability-based update strategy has been developed for generating new candidate solutions. This approach ensures the probability of determining the effect of the global best solution on the candidate solution. Besides, during the population update phase, there are two different mechanisms to update the global best solution and other grasshoppers. To enhance diversity in the grasshopper population, an α parameter has been integrated into the original algorithm. It was aimed to improve the quality of the candidate solutions by the integration of the α parameter. The performance of the proposed algorithm is assessed on the CAP and M* datasets. The obtained GAP values for the CAP 71-CAP A, CAP B, and CAP C problems are 0, 0.14, and 0.18, respectively. The GAP is 0 for the MO1-MO5, MP2, MP3, and MQ1-MQ3 problems, and GAP ≤ 0.24 for the remaining problems. The results were compared with other state-of-the-art binary optimization algorithms. The experimental results show that the proposed method is superior to the other compared algorithms and is an effective algorithm for solving UFLPs.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (JESTECH) (formerly Technology), a peer-reviewed quarterly engineering journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental high quality papers of permanent interest, not previously published in journals, in the field of engineering and applied science which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology and engineering. In addition to peer-reviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, state-of-the-art reviews and communications in the broadly defined field of engineering science and technology.
The scope of JESTECH includes a wide spectrum of subjects including:
-Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering (Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation; Coding, Cryptography, and Information Protection; Communications, Networks, Mobile Computing and Distributed Systems; Compilers and Operating Systems; Computer Architecture, Parallel Processing, and Dependability; Computer Vision and Robotics; Control Theory; Electromagnetic Waves, Microwave Techniques and Antennas; Embedded Systems; Integrated Circuits, VLSI Design, Testing, and CAD; Microelectromechanical Systems; Microelectronics, and Electronic Devices and Circuits; Power, Energy and Energy Conversion Systems; Signal, Image, and Speech Processing)
-Mechanical and Civil Engineering (Automotive Technologies; Biomechanics; Construction Materials; Design and Manufacturing; Dynamics and Control; Energy Generation, Utilization, Conversion, and Storage; Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics; Heat and Mass Transfer; Micro-Nano Sciences; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technologies; Robotics and Mechatronics; Solid Mechanics and Structure; Thermal Sciences)
-Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (Advanced Materials Science; Biomaterials; Ceramic and Inorgnanic Materials; Electronic-Magnetic Materials; Energy and Environment; Materials Characterizastion; Metallurgy; Polymers and Nanocomposites)