Evaluation of a Multispecialty Mobile Health App: Pilot Study

Q3 Medicine
Ryan Xiao MD , Roshan Patel BA , Tamara Rozental MD , Brian Schurko MD , Monica Shoji MD , Carl Harper MD
{"title":"Evaluation of a Multispecialty Mobile Health App: Pilot Study","authors":"Ryan Xiao MD ,&nbsp;Roshan Patel BA ,&nbsp;Tamara Rozental MD ,&nbsp;Brian Schurko MD ,&nbsp;Monica Shoji MD ,&nbsp;Carl Harper MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Educational mobile apps have been studied in multiple surgical disciplines, evaluating a wide range of possible benefits with varying success in improving overall quality of life after surgery. We hypothesize that utilization of a mobile health app in the perioperative setting will be easy to use and will improve patient satisfaction with care for patients undergoing hand surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were given access to a mobile app at their initial visit to access content about their diagnosis, treatment options, and care instructions for cubital tunnel syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome, distal radius fracture, trigger finger, or carpometacarpal arthritis. At their initial visit, patients were administered the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) survey to assess subjects' physical component summary (score-12) and mental component summary (score-12)health score, with higher scores indicating better function and with the United States average score at 50. At their 4-week postoperative visit, the participating patients were administered two surveys: the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (mAUQ) to address the usability and utility of mobile health care apps and SF-12. The mAUQ comprises 21 items rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 162 patients enrolled, 120 patients completed all survey items. Patients scored the mAUQ an average 6.2 of 7 regarding ease of use, 5.9 of 7 for system information arrangement, and 4.8 of 7 for usefulness. Comparing pre- to postsurgery SF-12 scores at 4 week follow-up, the patients demonstrated stable physical component summary (score-12) and a trend toward slightly worse mental component summary (score-12).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Overall, the patients found the mobile app easy to use, could sufficiently navigate the app, and found the information presented useful to their care. However, the patients did not find improvement in their mental health scores with the app.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 203-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124002500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Educational mobile apps have been studied in multiple surgical disciplines, evaluating a wide range of possible benefits with varying success in improving overall quality of life after surgery. We hypothesize that utilization of a mobile health app in the perioperative setting will be easy to use and will improve patient satisfaction with care for patients undergoing hand surgery.

Methods

Patients were given access to a mobile app at their initial visit to access content about their diagnosis, treatment options, and care instructions for cubital tunnel syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome, distal radius fracture, trigger finger, or carpometacarpal arthritis. At their initial visit, patients were administered the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) survey to assess subjects' physical component summary (score-12) and mental component summary (score-12)health score, with higher scores indicating better function and with the United States average score at 50. At their 4-week postoperative visit, the participating patients were administered two surveys: the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (mAUQ) to address the usability and utility of mobile health care apps and SF-12. The mAUQ comprises 21 items rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).

Results

Of the 162 patients enrolled, 120 patients completed all survey items. Patients scored the mAUQ an average 6.2 of 7 regarding ease of use, 5.9 of 7 for system information arrangement, and 4.8 of 7 for usefulness. Comparing pre- to postsurgery SF-12 scores at 4 week follow-up, the patients demonstrated stable physical component summary (score-12) and a trend toward slightly worse mental component summary (score-12).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance

Overall, the patients found the mobile app easy to use, could sufficiently navigate the app, and found the information presented useful to their care. However, the patients did not find improvement in their mental health scores with the app.
多专业移动健康应用程序的评估:试点研究
目的:在多个外科学科中对教育移动应用程序进行了研究,评估了在提高手术后整体生活质量方面取得不同成功的广泛可能益处。我们假设在围手术期使用移动健康应用程序将易于使用,并将提高手部手术患者对护理的满意度。方法患者在首次就诊时使用移动应用程序,获取其肘管综合征、腕管综合征、桡骨远端骨折、扳机指或腕掌骨关节炎的诊断、治疗方案和护理说明。在首次就诊时,患者接受了简短表格-12 (SF-12)调查,以评估受试者的身体成分总结(得分-12)和精神成分总结(得分-12)健康得分,得分越高表明功能越好,美国平均得分为50分。在术后4周的随访中,参与的患者接受了两项调查:移动医疗应用程序可用性问卷(mAUQ),以解决移动医疗应用程序和SF-12的可用性和实用性。mAUQ包括21个项目,从1(非常不同意)到7(非常同意)。结果162例入组患者中,120例患者完成了全部调查项目。患者对mAUQ的平均评分为:易用性(7分)6.2分,系统信息安排(7分)5.9分,实用性(7分)4.8分。在4周的随访中比较术前和术后SF-12评分,患者表现出稳定的身体成分总结(得分-12)和略差的精神成分总结(得分-12)的趋势。总体而言,患者认为移动应用程序易于使用,可以充分浏览应用程序,并且发现所提供的信息对他们的护理有用。然而,患者并没有发现该应用程序改善了他们的心理健康得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信