Exploring communication inefficiencies in disaster response: Perspectives of emergency managers and health professionals

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Reem Abbas, Todd Miller
{"title":"Exploring communication inefficiencies in disaster response: Perspectives of emergency managers and health professionals","authors":"Reem Abbas,&nbsp;Todd Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During disasters, emergency management and health agencies are typically the key providers of healthcare services, yet communication breakdowns between the two sectors often hinder response. This qualitative study explores the experiences of emergency managers and health professionals to identify challenges in cross-agency collaboration. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from New Zealand and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Inductive thematic analysis revealed three key challenges: structural, operational, and information exchange barriers. Weak interpersonal relationships and lack of prior liaison were found to impede information sharing, reducing situational awareness. Coordination was further undermined by inadequate training, insufficient funding, and reliance on untrained personnel. Rigid planning structures, limited community engagement, and the exclusion of vulnerable groups also weakened response efforts. Overly complex reporting structures and fragmented information systems restricted effective data sharing, with privacy concerns further constraining access to critical information. Interoperability challenges further disrupt the seamless flow of information across disaster response agencies. Finally, the absence of robust auditing and accountability mechanisms highlighted the need for reinforced governance frameworks and institutionalised performance evaluations to enhance disaster resilience and response effectiveness. Identifying barriers to effective communication and information sharing among key disaster response stakeholders provides valuable insights for refining emergency response strategies including the development of clear protocols, improved data integration, and the adoption of AI and digital tools to streamline reporting and enhance decision-making. These enhancements can lead to improved quality of care, faster recovery, and more efficient resource allocation during disasters, ultimately benefiting affected populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 105393"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925002171","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During disasters, emergency management and health agencies are typically the key providers of healthcare services, yet communication breakdowns between the two sectors often hinder response. This qualitative study explores the experiences of emergency managers and health professionals to identify challenges in cross-agency collaboration. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from New Zealand and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Inductive thematic analysis revealed three key challenges: structural, operational, and information exchange barriers. Weak interpersonal relationships and lack of prior liaison were found to impede information sharing, reducing situational awareness. Coordination was further undermined by inadequate training, insufficient funding, and reliance on untrained personnel. Rigid planning structures, limited community engagement, and the exclusion of vulnerable groups also weakened response efforts. Overly complex reporting structures and fragmented information systems restricted effective data sharing, with privacy concerns further constraining access to critical information. Interoperability challenges further disrupt the seamless flow of information across disaster response agencies. Finally, the absence of robust auditing and accountability mechanisms highlighted the need for reinforced governance frameworks and institutionalised performance evaluations to enhance disaster resilience and response effectiveness. Identifying barriers to effective communication and information sharing among key disaster response stakeholders provides valuable insights for refining emergency response strategies including the development of clear protocols, improved data integration, and the adoption of AI and digital tools to streamline reporting and enhance decision-making. These enhancements can lead to improved quality of care, faster recovery, and more efficient resource allocation during disasters, ultimately benefiting affected populations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信