Clinical interpretation of DLCO and KCO: From rationale to clinical and research applications

IF 2.4 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Masafumi Yamamoto , Kaoruko Shimizu
{"title":"Clinical interpretation of DLCO and KCO: From rationale to clinical and research applications","authors":"Masafumi Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Kaoruko Shimizu","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Single-breath methods for measuring the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL<sub>CO</sub>), Krogh's constant for CO (K<sub>CO</sub>), and alveolar volume (V<sub>A</sub>) play clinically vital roles in assessing lung diffusion. While the methodology is valid for the kinetics of normal lungs, appropriate interpretations are necessary for lung diseases involving emphysema and/or ventilation heterogeneity. Severe airflow limitations and ventilation heterogeneities lead to the underestimation of lung volume, calculated as V<sub>A</sub>, relative to the total lung capacity assessed using the helium closed-circuit method. Notably, the relative increase in K<sub>CO</sub> (DL<sub>CO</sub>/V<sub>A</sub>) compared to DL<sub>CO</sub>—resulting from increased blood flow per alveolar–capillary unit in small lungs with fibrosis—is a distinct feature of interstitial lung disease. Therefore, the combined assessment of DL<sub>CO</sub> and K<sub>CO</sub> may help elucidate the pathophysiology of emphysema and/or pulmonary fibrosis. This review aims to explain Krogh's equation, the difference between DL<sub>CO</sub> and D’L<sub>CO</sub>, the kinetics, and the clinical application of DL<sub>CO</sub> (or D’L<sub>CO</sub>) and K<sub>CO</sub>. Pulmonary function varies among ethnicities and races; thus, reference equations derived while considering anthropological traits are necessary. Additionally, the link between physiological theory, radiological findings, and the clinical relevance of DL<sub>CO</sub> and K<sub>CO</sub> is discussed, mostly based on Japanese studies. In this review, DL<sub>CO</sub> obtained from the single-breath method is referred to as ”D’L<sub>CO</sub>”; however, for convenience, it is described as “DL<sub>CO</sub>,” with the term “D’L<sub>CO</sub>” used only where necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":"63 3","pages":"Pages 358-364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534525000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-breath methods for measuring the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), Krogh's constant for CO (KCO), and alveolar volume (VA) play clinically vital roles in assessing lung diffusion. While the methodology is valid for the kinetics of normal lungs, appropriate interpretations are necessary for lung diseases involving emphysema and/or ventilation heterogeneity. Severe airflow limitations and ventilation heterogeneities lead to the underestimation of lung volume, calculated as VA, relative to the total lung capacity assessed using the helium closed-circuit method. Notably, the relative increase in KCO (DLCO/VA) compared to DLCO—resulting from increased blood flow per alveolar–capillary unit in small lungs with fibrosis—is a distinct feature of interstitial lung disease. Therefore, the combined assessment of DLCO and KCO may help elucidate the pathophysiology of emphysema and/or pulmonary fibrosis. This review aims to explain Krogh's equation, the difference between DLCO and D’LCO, the kinetics, and the clinical application of DLCO (or D’LCO) and KCO. Pulmonary function varies among ethnicities and races; thus, reference equations derived while considering anthropological traits are necessary. Additionally, the link between physiological theory, radiological findings, and the clinical relevance of DLCO and KCO is discussed, mostly based on Japanese studies. In this review, DLCO obtained from the single-breath method is referred to as ”D’LCO”; however, for convenience, it is described as “DLCO,” with the term “D’LCO” used only where necessary.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信