“I'm supposed to be a helper”: Spiritual distress of abortion providers after the Dobbs decision

Leah M Bode BS, Komal A Kumar MD, Josie C McQuillan BS, Nicole P Scott MD, Caitlin Bernard MD, MSCI
{"title":"“I'm supposed to be a helper”: Spiritual distress of abortion providers after the Dobbs decision","authors":"Leah M Bode BS,&nbsp;Komal A Kumar MD,&nbsp;Josie C McQuillan BS,&nbsp;Nicole P Scott MD,&nbsp;Caitlin Bernard MD, MSCI","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The <em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</em> decision has undoubtably affected the practice of abortion providers nationally. We hypothesized that <em>Dobbs</em> has also impacted the ways in which providers experience meaning and purpose through their work, which are elements of spirituality.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to describe the spectrum of spirituality of abortion providers and understand whether and how the <em>Dobbs</em> decision caused spiritual distress.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>For this qualitative study, we conducted video interviews with 26 abortion providers from 17 states between November 2022 and February 2023. States were classified according to the Guttmacher Institute classifications from most restrictive to very protective as of December 2022. Interviews included questions such as, <em>“Can you describe your own sense of spirituality or spiritual identity?”</em> and <em>“How does your spiritual belief inform your response to the</em> Dobbs <em>decision?”</em></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants’ states of practice were well-distributed across the abortion restrictive-protective spectrum. The majority of participants were spiritual, while less than half identified as part of an organized religion. Many participants felt a spiritual <em>call</em> or <em>obligation</em> to provide abortion care and 46% described abortion as a <em>spiritual act</em> for provider and/or patient. Most participants experienced spiritual distress (74%), including those practicing in states across the restrictive-protective spectrum. Of note, 92% of participants described their spirituality as helpful in coping with the effects of the fall of <em>Roe v. Wade</em>. Sources of strength included advocacy, agency, legislative work, and community; over half specifically cited the abortion provider community.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The <em>Dobbs</em> decision—and subsequent state-level abortion restrictions—impacts abortion providers by causing spiritual distress. While many abortion-restrictive laws are influenced by religious or spiritual beliefs, it is important to recognize that abortion providers are also spiritual individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825000309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision has undoubtably affected the practice of abortion providers nationally. We hypothesized that Dobbs has also impacted the ways in which providers experience meaning and purpose through their work, which are elements of spirituality.

Objective

We sought to describe the spectrum of spirituality of abortion providers and understand whether and how the Dobbs decision caused spiritual distress.

Study Design

For this qualitative study, we conducted video interviews with 26 abortion providers from 17 states between November 2022 and February 2023. States were classified according to the Guttmacher Institute classifications from most restrictive to very protective as of December 2022. Interviews included questions such as, “Can you describe your own sense of spirituality or spiritual identity?” and “How does your spiritual belief inform your response to the Dobbs decision?”

Results

Participants’ states of practice were well-distributed across the abortion restrictive-protective spectrum. The majority of participants were spiritual, while less than half identified as part of an organized religion. Many participants felt a spiritual call or obligation to provide abortion care and 46% described abortion as a spiritual act for provider and/or patient. Most participants experienced spiritual distress (74%), including those practicing in states across the restrictive-protective spectrum. Of note, 92% of participants described their spirituality as helpful in coping with the effects of the fall of Roe v. Wade. Sources of strength included advocacy, agency, legislative work, and community; over half specifically cited the abortion provider community.

Conclusions

The Dobbs decision—and subsequent state-level abortion restrictions—impacts abortion providers by causing spiritual distress. While many abortion-restrictive laws are influenced by religious or spiritual beliefs, it is important to recognize that abortion providers are also spiritual individuals.
“我应该是一个帮手”:多布斯案判决后堕胎提供者的精神痛苦
多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的判决无疑影响了全国范围内堕胎提供者的做法。我们假设Dobbs也影响了提供者通过他们的工作体验意义和目的的方式,这是灵性的元素。目的我们试图描述堕胎提供者的灵性光谱,并了解多布斯决定是否以及如何引起精神痛苦。在这项定性研究中,我们在2022年11月至2023年2月期间对来自17个州的26名堕胎提供者进行了视频采访。截至2022年12月,根据古特马赫研究所的分类,各州从最严格到非常保护。采访的问题包括:“你能描述一下你自己的精神或精神身份吗?”以及“你的精神信仰如何影响你对多布斯案判决的回应?”结果参与者的实践状态在堕胎限制-保护谱上分布良好。大多数参与者信仰宗教,只有不到一半的人认为自己是有组织宗教的一部分。许多参与者感到提供堕胎护理是一种精神召唤或义务,46%的人将堕胎描述为提供者和/或患者的精神行为。大多数参与者都经历了精神上的痛苦(74%),包括那些在限制-保护范围内练习的人。值得注意的是,92%的参与者称他们的精神信仰有助于应对罗伊诉韦德案的影响。力量的来源包括宣传、机构、立法工作和社区;超过一半的人特别提到了堕胎提供者社区。结论多布斯判决和随后的州级堕胎限制通过造成精神痛苦影响堕胎提供者。虽然许多限制堕胎的法律受到宗教或精神信仰的影响,但重要的是要认识到堕胎提供者也是有精神的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信