Optimizing Efficacy of Vacuum Bell Therapy for Pectus Excavatum: Compliance is Key

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Donna C. Koo MD , P. Nina Scalise MD , Megan Z. Chiu MD , Erik Banda BS , Gheed Murtadi MBBS , Kelly Bartkus MSN , John Gironda PA-C , Samantha Pillen BSN , Steven J. Staffa BS , Konstantinos Papadakis MD , Craig W. Lillehei MD , Tom Jaksic MD , Farokh R. Demehri MD
{"title":"Optimizing Efficacy of Vacuum Bell Therapy for Pectus Excavatum: Compliance is Key","authors":"Donna C. Koo MD ,&nbsp;P. Nina Scalise MD ,&nbsp;Megan Z. Chiu MD ,&nbsp;Erik Banda BS ,&nbsp;Gheed Murtadi MBBS ,&nbsp;Kelly Bartkus MSN ,&nbsp;John Gironda PA-C ,&nbsp;Samantha Pillen BSN ,&nbsp;Steven J. Staffa BS ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Papadakis MD ,&nbsp;Craig W. Lillehei MD ,&nbsp;Tom Jaksic MD ,&nbsp;Farokh R. Demehri MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common congenital chest wall deformity. The vacuum bell (VB) is a nonoperative alternative to surgical correction. We reviewed our center's experience with VB for PE to identify variables associated with improved therapeutic success, with a focus on compliance to prescribed VB therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-center retrospective review of patients with PE who initiated VB therapy from August 2020 to August 2023. Patients who were fully compliant with therapy (defined as 28 h/week) were compared to patients who were noncompliant (&lt;27 h/week). Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors predictive of pectus excavatum depth (PED) correction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-seven patients (86% male) initiated VB therapy. Of these, 22 patients (38.6%) were compliant with prescribed VB usage and 35 (61.4%) were noncompliant. There was a significant difference in PED correction between compliant and noncompliant groups (28.0% <em>versus</em> 16.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Hours of VB usage per week was the strongest predictor of PED correction (<em>P</em> = 0.023). Days of treatment and lower initial Haller index also significantly predicted PED correction (<em>P</em> = 0.036 and <em>P</em> = 0.043, respectively), while height, weight, age, sex, and initial PED were not significant predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although age and initial PED are thought to affect VB efficacy, our data demonstrates that when compliance with therapy is factored, these variables do not significantly predict therapeutic success. Therefore, for a highly compliant patient, VB therapy can be effective regardless of age or severity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 112-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002248042500071X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common congenital chest wall deformity. The vacuum bell (VB) is a nonoperative alternative to surgical correction. We reviewed our center's experience with VB for PE to identify variables associated with improved therapeutic success, with a focus on compliance to prescribed VB therapy.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective review of patients with PE who initiated VB therapy from August 2020 to August 2023. Patients who were fully compliant with therapy (defined as 28 h/week) were compared to patients who were noncompliant (<27 h/week). Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors predictive of pectus excavatum depth (PED) correction.

Results

Fifty-seven patients (86% male) initiated VB therapy. Of these, 22 patients (38.6%) were compliant with prescribed VB usage and 35 (61.4%) were noncompliant. There was a significant difference in PED correction between compliant and noncompliant groups (28.0% versus 16.0%, P < 0.001). Hours of VB usage per week was the strongest predictor of PED correction (P = 0.023). Days of treatment and lower initial Haller index also significantly predicted PED correction (P = 0.036 and P = 0.043, respectively), while height, weight, age, sex, and initial PED were not significant predictors.

Conclusions

Although age and initial PED are thought to affect VB efficacy, our data demonstrates that when compliance with therapy is factored, these variables do not significantly predict therapeutic success. Therefore, for a highly compliant patient, VB therapy can be effective regardless of age or severity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信