Overall smoke control performance using naturally ventilated shafts in tunnel fires with multiple fire sources

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Kun He , Ying Zhen Li , Haukur Ingason , Xudong Cheng
{"title":"Overall smoke control performance using naturally ventilated shafts in tunnel fires with multiple fire sources","authors":"Kun He ,&nbsp;Ying Zhen Li ,&nbsp;Haukur Ingason ,&nbsp;Xudong Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the overall smoke control performance using shafts in a naturally ventilated tunnel in the case of multiple fire sources. Detailed comparisons were also made with the corresponding single fire source scenarios. The results show that the interaction between multiple fire sources affects smoke control performance, resulting in a lower smoke layer height compared to the corresponding single fire scenario. For the multiple fire sources scenarios, the smoke layer height in the fire section first decreases and then keeps stable, as the fire center spacing increases. The smoke layer height in the fire section is 20%–25% lower than that in a single fire source scenario for a given total heat release rate. The minimum smoke layer height at the adjacent non-fire tunnel section is much lower than that in the fire section due to the disturbance of the first group of shafts. For a small tunnel fire such as a car fire, the critical safety distances for firefighters and evacuees increase as the fire source spacing decreases. For a large tunnel fire such as a bus fire, the effect of fire source spacing on the critical safety distance is limited, while the shaft interval plays an important role. The fire source spacing and the number of fire sources have limited influences on the smoke spread length due to the small differences in the induced air flow velocity and overall smoke exhaust rate through shafts. When the fire sources are located under one shaft, the number of shafts required for complete smoke exhaust is the least and the total smoke spread length is the shortest. For a given fire location, the smoke spread length increases significantly with an increasing shaft interval. This study contributes to the design of natural ventilation shafts in tunnels possibly with multiple fire sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 168-185"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967425000133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the overall smoke control performance using shafts in a naturally ventilated tunnel in the case of multiple fire sources. Detailed comparisons were also made with the corresponding single fire source scenarios. The results show that the interaction between multiple fire sources affects smoke control performance, resulting in a lower smoke layer height compared to the corresponding single fire scenario. For the multiple fire sources scenarios, the smoke layer height in the fire section first decreases and then keeps stable, as the fire center spacing increases. The smoke layer height in the fire section is 20%–25% lower than that in a single fire source scenario for a given total heat release rate. The minimum smoke layer height at the adjacent non-fire tunnel section is much lower than that in the fire section due to the disturbance of the first group of shafts. For a small tunnel fire such as a car fire, the critical safety distances for firefighters and evacuees increase as the fire source spacing decreases. For a large tunnel fire such as a bus fire, the effect of fire source spacing on the critical safety distance is limited, while the shaft interval plays an important role. The fire source spacing and the number of fire sources have limited influences on the smoke spread length due to the small differences in the induced air flow velocity and overall smoke exhaust rate through shafts. When the fire sources are located under one shaft, the number of shafts required for complete smoke exhaust is the least and the total smoke spread length is the shortest. For a given fire location, the smoke spread length increases significantly with an increasing shaft interval. This study contributes to the design of natural ventilation shafts in tunnels possibly with multiple fire sources.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信