Self-attenuation effect correction methods employed for gamma-ray spectrometry: A critical review study

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
A. Barba-Lobo
{"title":"Self-attenuation effect correction methods employed for gamma-ray spectrometry: A critical review study","authors":"A. Barba-Lobo","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The usage of gamma-ray spectrometry has become generalized due to several important advantages that offers versus other radiometric techniques such as alpha-particle spectrometry or liquid scintillation counting. When using gamma-ray spectrometry, the full-energy peak efficiency, FEPE, must be accurately and precisely obtained for a wide range of sample chemical compositions, apparent densities and thicknesses, as well as geometries and energies. For this, the self-attenuation effect corrections must be properly applied for each case in order to transform the calibration sample FEPE into problem sample FEPE. Nowadays, different experimental and simulated methodologies such as Cutshall and Appleby models, and LabSOCS, EFFTRAN, DETEFF, PENELOPE and Geant4, respectively, are generally applied to obtain the problem sample FEPE. However, in many cases, self-attenuation effect corrections can be not properly applied. For this reason, the aim of this study is to comprehensively critical review many different experimental and simulated methodologies usually used to apply self-attenuation effect corrections, offering exhaustive discussions about their proper use as well as proposals to improve many different aspects related to them, and making deep comparisons among their advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, an exhaustive comparison among FEPEs obtained using experimental and simulated methodologies was addressed. In the case of the sample pretreatment, this study also offers a wide discussion of many aspects related to their homogenization process regarding the chemical composition and compaction. In addition, the proper selection of the multielement technique for the major element concentrations is also widely discussed in this study, where an accurate measurement of major element concentrations is essential to properly obtain the sample mass attenuation coefficient which is needed to apply self-attenuation effect corrections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 112665"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25001574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The usage of gamma-ray spectrometry has become generalized due to several important advantages that offers versus other radiometric techniques such as alpha-particle spectrometry or liquid scintillation counting. When using gamma-ray spectrometry, the full-energy peak efficiency, FEPE, must be accurately and precisely obtained for a wide range of sample chemical compositions, apparent densities and thicknesses, as well as geometries and energies. For this, the self-attenuation effect corrections must be properly applied for each case in order to transform the calibration sample FEPE into problem sample FEPE. Nowadays, different experimental and simulated methodologies such as Cutshall and Appleby models, and LabSOCS, EFFTRAN, DETEFF, PENELOPE and Geant4, respectively, are generally applied to obtain the problem sample FEPE. However, in many cases, self-attenuation effect corrections can be not properly applied. For this reason, the aim of this study is to comprehensively critical review many different experimental and simulated methodologies usually used to apply self-attenuation effect corrections, offering exhaustive discussions about their proper use as well as proposals to improve many different aspects related to them, and making deep comparisons among their advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, an exhaustive comparison among FEPEs obtained using experimental and simulated methodologies was addressed. In the case of the sample pretreatment, this study also offers a wide discussion of many aspects related to their homogenization process regarding the chemical composition and compaction. In addition, the proper selection of the multielement technique for the major element concentrations is also widely discussed in this study, where an accurate measurement of major element concentrations is essential to properly obtain the sample mass attenuation coefficient which is needed to apply self-attenuation effect corrections.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信