Being heard, restoring a social connection and decreasing anger: Adult patients’ perceptions of clinical services addressing violent extremism in Montreal, Canada

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Cécile Rousseau , Cindy Ngov , Samuel Veissière , Christian Desmarais , Tara Santavicca , Janique Johnson-Lafleur
{"title":"Being heard, restoring a social connection and decreasing anger: Adult patients’ perceptions of clinical services addressing violent extremism in Montreal, Canada","authors":"Cécile Rousseau ,&nbsp;Cindy Ngov ,&nbsp;Samuel Veissière ,&nbsp;Christian Desmarais ,&nbsp;Tara Santavicca ,&nbsp;Janique Johnson-Lafleur","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Growing social polarization and ideological radicalization contribute to an increased risk of violence, particularly among vulnerable individuals experiencing despair and marginalization. Understanding the subjective experiences of individuals involved in violent extremism (VE) can inform the development of effective clinical and social interventions that promote disengagement and reintegration. Despite increasing efforts to address VE through tertiary prevention programs, little research has examined how individuals perceive these interventions and their impact on well-being and social reintegration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This qualitative study explores the perspectives of individuals receiving VE prevention services in Montreal, Canada. Using a phenomenological framework, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 participants (17 men and 1 woman; ages 17–72, mean = 32) referred by a specialized clinical team. Participation was voluntary, with confidentiality safeguards. Interviews were conducted in English or French, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using an inductive coding approach.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Three key themes emerged. (1) Being Heard – Participants highlighted the therapeutic alliance, emphasizing the importance of being listened to without judgment and feeling respected by clinicians. (2) Restoring Social Connection – Engagement in services helped individuals re-establish social ties, navigate interpersonal conflicts, and reduce isolation. (3) Emotional Regulation and Decreased Anger – Participants reported improved emotional control, reduced distress, and a shift away from violent impulses. While some retained ideological beliefs, they no longer viewed violence as a viable option.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight the role of clinical interventions in addressing social marginalization and distress among individuals at risk of VE. A trauma-informed, non-judgmental, and relationship-based approach appears central to fostering trust, reducing distress, and supporting disengagement. These results highlight the need for interdisciplinary models that integrate mental health, social services, and policy interventions to prevent violence and reintegrate individuals into society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325000398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Growing social polarization and ideological radicalization contribute to an increased risk of violence, particularly among vulnerable individuals experiencing despair and marginalization. Understanding the subjective experiences of individuals involved in violent extremism (VE) can inform the development of effective clinical and social interventions that promote disengagement and reintegration. Despite increasing efforts to address VE through tertiary prevention programs, little research has examined how individuals perceive these interventions and their impact on well-being and social reintegration.

Methods

This qualitative study explores the perspectives of individuals receiving VE prevention services in Montreal, Canada. Using a phenomenological framework, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 participants (17 men and 1 woman; ages 17–72, mean = 32) referred by a specialized clinical team. Participation was voluntary, with confidentiality safeguards. Interviews were conducted in English or French, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using an inductive coding approach.

Findings

Three key themes emerged. (1) Being Heard – Participants highlighted the therapeutic alliance, emphasizing the importance of being listened to without judgment and feeling respected by clinicians. (2) Restoring Social Connection – Engagement in services helped individuals re-establish social ties, navigate interpersonal conflicts, and reduce isolation. (3) Emotional Regulation and Decreased Anger – Participants reported improved emotional control, reduced distress, and a shift away from violent impulses. While some retained ideological beliefs, they no longer viewed violence as a viable option.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the role of clinical interventions in addressing social marginalization and distress among individuals at risk of VE. A trauma-informed, non-judgmental, and relationship-based approach appears central to fostering trust, reducing distress, and supporting disengagement. These results highlight the need for interdisciplinary models that integrate mental health, social services, and policy interventions to prevent violence and reintegrate individuals into society.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信