Global readiness for carbon neutrality: From targets to action

IF 14 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shihui Zhang , Wenjia Cai , Xinzhu Zheng , Xuedu Lv , Kangxin An , Yuan Cao , Hou Sang Cheng , Jingyi Dai , Xinyang Dong , Shuting Fan , Yiying Gao , Zaizuo Gong , Yusheng Guan , Congkai Hong , Jie Li , Mingyu Li , Yukai Li , Songrun Liang , Weiyi Liao , Zhongqi Ma , Kebin He
{"title":"Global readiness for carbon neutrality: From targets to action","authors":"Shihui Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenjia Cai ,&nbsp;Xinzhu Zheng ,&nbsp;Xuedu Lv ,&nbsp;Kangxin An ,&nbsp;Yuan Cao ,&nbsp;Hou Sang Cheng ,&nbsp;Jingyi Dai ,&nbsp;Xinyang Dong ,&nbsp;Shuting Fan ,&nbsp;Yiying Gao ,&nbsp;Zaizuo Gong ,&nbsp;Yusheng Guan ,&nbsp;Congkai Hong ,&nbsp;Jie Li ,&nbsp;Mingyu Li ,&nbsp;Yukai Li ,&nbsp;Songrun Liang ,&nbsp;Weiyi Liao ,&nbsp;Zhongqi Ma ,&nbsp;Kebin He","doi":"10.1016/j.ese.2025.100546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global push for carbon neutrality highlights the need for rigorous assessments of whether national efforts align with stated targets. However, existing evaluations often prioritize commitments over tangible progress, lacking comprehensive and transparent metrics. To bridge this gap, we develop a multidimensional indicator system that evaluates targets, policies, actions, and effectiveness across key areas, including policy implementation, technology deployment, financial investment, and international cooperation. While 151 countries have pledged carbon neutrality—19 of which are developing nations that made commitments in 2024—implementation remains uneven. Only 72 countries have established complete policy frameworks, and advanced low-carbon technologies are concentrated in a handful of nations. Current trends indicate that global renewable energy capacity will reach just 2.7 times its 2022 level by 2030, falling short of the tripling target. Moreover, the global median action score in 2024 stands at only 25—far below the target of 65—highlighting the urgency for stronger efforts. Our findings reveal a significant gap between ambition and action, with renewable energy deployment lagging behind expectations. To accelerate progress, enhanced global cooperation, increased investment, and fewer barriers to technology diffusion are crucial. This study underscores the need for more implementation-focused tracking to ensure carbon neutrality commitments translate into measurable outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34434,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100546"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498425000249","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global push for carbon neutrality highlights the need for rigorous assessments of whether national efforts align with stated targets. However, existing evaluations often prioritize commitments over tangible progress, lacking comprehensive and transparent metrics. To bridge this gap, we develop a multidimensional indicator system that evaluates targets, policies, actions, and effectiveness across key areas, including policy implementation, technology deployment, financial investment, and international cooperation. While 151 countries have pledged carbon neutrality—19 of which are developing nations that made commitments in 2024—implementation remains uneven. Only 72 countries have established complete policy frameworks, and advanced low-carbon technologies are concentrated in a handful of nations. Current trends indicate that global renewable energy capacity will reach just 2.7 times its 2022 level by 2030, falling short of the tripling target. Moreover, the global median action score in 2024 stands at only 25—far below the target of 65—highlighting the urgency for stronger efforts. Our findings reveal a significant gap between ambition and action, with renewable energy deployment lagging behind expectations. To accelerate progress, enhanced global cooperation, increased investment, and fewer barriers to technology diffusion are crucial. This study underscores the need for more implementation-focused tracking to ensure carbon neutrality commitments translate into measurable outcomes.

Abstract Image

全球碳中和准备:从目标到行动
全球对碳中和的推动凸显了对各国努力是否符合既定目标进行严格评估的必要性。然而,现有的评价往往将承诺置于实际进展之上,缺乏全面和透明的衡量标准。为了弥补这一差距,我们制定了一个多维指标体系,对政策实施、技术部署、金融投资和国际合作等关键领域的目标、政策、行动和有效性进行评估。尽管151个国家已经承诺实现碳中和,其中19个是发展中国家,并在2024年做出了承诺,但实施情况仍然参差不齐。只有72个国家建立了完整的政策框架,先进的低碳技术集中在少数几个国家。目前的趋势表明,到2030年,全球可再生能源容量将仅达到2022年水平的2.7倍,达不到翻三番的目标。此外,到2024年,全球行动得分中位数仅为25分,远低于65分的目标,这凸显了加强努力的紧迫性。我们的研究结果揭示了雄心与行动之间的巨大差距,可再生能源的部署落后于预期。为加快进展,加强全球合作、增加投资和减少技术传播障碍至关重要。这项研究强调,需要更多以实施为重点的跟踪,以确保碳中和承诺转化为可衡量的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
6.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Ecotechnology (ESE) is an international, open-access journal publishing original research in environmental science, engineering, ecotechnology, and related fields. Authors publishing in ESE can immediately, permanently, and freely share their work. They have license options and retain copyright. Published by Elsevier, ESE is co-organized by the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, and the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信