Hydrogen jet fire accident prediction model for hydrogen refueling station based on hybrid neural network

IF 6.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Xu He , Guodong Yang , Depeng Kong
{"title":"Hydrogen jet fire accident prediction model for hydrogen refueling station based on hybrid neural network","authors":"Xu He ,&nbsp;Guodong Yang ,&nbsp;Depeng Kong","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The burgeoning hydrogen energy sector, particularly in China, is a key part of the ongoing energy transition. However, the rapid expansion of hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) introduces significant safety concerns due to potential high-pressure hydrogen leaks leading to fires or explosions. Accurate consequence prediction is crucial for effective risk mitigation. While numerical simulations offer precision, they are computationally intensive, hindering timely responses. Theoretical models provide faster results, but their applicability diminishes in complex scenarios, such as when jet fires interact with obstacles. To address these limitations, this study introduces a hybrid model-based and data-driven approach that combines the strengths of Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and incorporates a model-based flame parameters prediction method. This model aims to rapidly and accurately predict the flame shape and temperature distribution of hydrogen jet fires, even when obstacles are present. The numerical simulation data used for model training have been validated through literature experiment, ensuring the accuracy of the predictions. Similarly, the accuracy of the model's predicted flame width data was assessed using experimental data, with an average relative error of 7.96 %. The results demonstrate that the model surpasses traditional numerical methods in terms of efficiency and is capable of handling complex scenarios, providing rapid and relatively accurate predictions. It serves as a valuable tool for process safety and risk management, offering substantial support for safety management and emergency decision-making at hydrogen refueling stations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107027"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025002940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The burgeoning hydrogen energy sector, particularly in China, is a key part of the ongoing energy transition. However, the rapid expansion of hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) introduces significant safety concerns due to potential high-pressure hydrogen leaks leading to fires or explosions. Accurate consequence prediction is crucial for effective risk mitigation. While numerical simulations offer precision, they are computationally intensive, hindering timely responses. Theoretical models provide faster results, but their applicability diminishes in complex scenarios, such as when jet fires interact with obstacles. To address these limitations, this study introduces a hybrid model-based and data-driven approach that combines the strengths of Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and incorporates a model-based flame parameters prediction method. This model aims to rapidly and accurately predict the flame shape and temperature distribution of hydrogen jet fires, even when obstacles are present. The numerical simulation data used for model training have been validated through literature experiment, ensuring the accuracy of the predictions. Similarly, the accuracy of the model's predicted flame width data was assessed using experimental data, with an average relative error of 7.96 %. The results demonstrate that the model surpasses traditional numerical methods in terms of efficiency and is capable of handling complex scenarios, providing rapid and relatively accurate predictions. It serves as a valuable tool for process safety and risk management, offering substantial support for safety management and emergency decision-making at hydrogen refueling stations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信