Age-dependent semantic interference effect on propositional speech production

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Gail A. Robinson , Thomas Hollingsworth , Melody M.Y. Chan
{"title":"Age-dependent semantic interference effect on propositional speech production","authors":"Gail A. Robinson ,&nbsp;Thomas Hollingsworth ,&nbsp;Melody M.Y. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Older adults can find verbal communication in noisy environments challenging, but the underlying cognitive phenomena and the specific mechanisms contributing to age-related decline remain unclear. Using a newly designed propositional speech production paradigm, we examined how semantic distractors of varying levels of relatedness affect propositional speech performance in healthy adults. In the paradigm, participants were assessed on their ability to formulate verbal responses while distracted by semantically related or unrelated words, simulating real-world scenarios with meaningful auditory distractions (e.g., sounds from radio programs). We also examined the cognitive processes associated with task performance. We recruited 30 younger participants (mean age: 22.23 years) and 27 older participants (mean age: 75.31 years) matched for sex, handedness, and intelligence. All participants were screened using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and neuropsychological assessments. Older adults performed better than younger adults on a semantic memory task, but performed poorer on tasks assessing executive functions, including interference control, verbal response initiation and suppression, and semantic verbal fluency. In the novel propositional speech production task, older adults exhibited a pronounced semantic interference effect (F<sub>1.58, 83.67</sub> = 4.67, <em>p</em> = .018, ηp<sup>2</sup> = .08; with MoCA as a covariate), particularly for concrete distractors, resulting in longer response latencies compared to associative and unrelated distractors (Bonferroni-corrected P-values &lt;.01). Exploratory correlation analyses revealed that longer response latencies in the propositional speech production task were associated with a poorer performance on neuropsychological tests tapping verbal response suppression (false discovery rate-corrected <em>p</em> &lt; .05). Our findings suggest that verbal communication difficulties in the context of environmental distractions experienced by older adults could be due to the semantic interference effect. Cognitive interventions aimed at enhancing inhibitory control could be beneficial to older adults in maintaining their social engagement in the later life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"185 ","pages":"Pages 229-239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945225000590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults can find verbal communication in noisy environments challenging, but the underlying cognitive phenomena and the specific mechanisms contributing to age-related decline remain unclear. Using a newly designed propositional speech production paradigm, we examined how semantic distractors of varying levels of relatedness affect propositional speech performance in healthy adults. In the paradigm, participants were assessed on their ability to formulate verbal responses while distracted by semantically related or unrelated words, simulating real-world scenarios with meaningful auditory distractions (e.g., sounds from radio programs). We also examined the cognitive processes associated with task performance. We recruited 30 younger participants (mean age: 22.23 years) and 27 older participants (mean age: 75.31 years) matched for sex, handedness, and intelligence. All participants were screened using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and neuropsychological assessments. Older adults performed better than younger adults on a semantic memory task, but performed poorer on tasks assessing executive functions, including interference control, verbal response initiation and suppression, and semantic verbal fluency. In the novel propositional speech production task, older adults exhibited a pronounced semantic interference effect (F1.58, 83.67 = 4.67, p = .018, ηp2 = .08; with MoCA as a covariate), particularly for concrete distractors, resulting in longer response latencies compared to associative and unrelated distractors (Bonferroni-corrected P-values <.01). Exploratory correlation analyses revealed that longer response latencies in the propositional speech production task were associated with a poorer performance on neuropsychological tests tapping verbal response suppression (false discovery rate-corrected p < .05). Our findings suggest that verbal communication difficulties in the context of environmental distractions experienced by older adults could be due to the semantic interference effect. Cognitive interventions aimed at enhancing inhibitory control could be beneficial to older adults in maintaining their social engagement in the later life.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信