Impact of the changes from ICD-10 to ICD-11 in the diagnosis of depressive disorder in the general population

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Lea Francia , Marta Miret , Elvira Lara , Blanca Dolz Del Castellar , Joan Domenech-Abella , Beatriz Olaya , Josep Maria Haro , Daniel Morillo Cuadrado , José Luis Ayuso Mateos
{"title":"Impact of the changes from ICD-10 to ICD-11 in the diagnosis of depressive disorder in the general population","authors":"Lea Francia ,&nbsp;Marta Miret ,&nbsp;Elvira Lara ,&nbsp;Blanca Dolz Del Castellar ,&nbsp;Joan Domenech-Abella ,&nbsp;Beatriz Olaya ,&nbsp;Josep Maria Haro ,&nbsp;Daniel Morillo Cuadrado ,&nbsp;José Luis Ayuso Mateos","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The World Health Organization recently revised the criteria for the diagnosis of depressive disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). This most recent version of the classification (ICD-11) presents some notable differences from the previous one that may impact the prevalence rate.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to assess the impact of changes on the diagnosis of depressive episodes in the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We used a general population sample (<em>n</em> = 2911; Age, <em>M</em> = 59; Gender, 56 % women) from the project ‘Edad con Salud’ using face-to-face interviews based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Instrument. To explore the impact of changes between ICD-10 and ICD-11, we compared participants with a diagnosis of a depressive disorder and those without, as well as participants who presented depression in only one of the two versions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>When using the ICD-10 criteria, we identified 189 cases of depressive episodes against 186 with ICD-11. Five and two participants were respectively diagnosed only with ICD-10 and ICD-11. The weighted lifetime prevalence is identical using both diagnostic criteria (6.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite the changes introduced in the classification, the prevalence of depressive episodes identified by ICD-10 and ICD-11 in a general population sample is almost identical.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"184 ","pages":"Pages 367-370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625001669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The World Health Organization recently revised the criteria for the diagnosis of depressive disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). This most recent version of the classification (ICD-11) presents some notable differences from the previous one that may impact the prevalence rate.

Objective

This study aims to assess the impact of changes on the diagnosis of depressive episodes in the general population.

Method

We used a general population sample (n = 2911; Age, M = 59; Gender, 56 % women) from the project ‘Edad con Salud’ using face-to-face interviews based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Instrument. To explore the impact of changes between ICD-10 and ICD-11, we compared participants with a diagnosis of a depressive disorder and those without, as well as participants who presented depression in only one of the two versions.

Results

When using the ICD-10 criteria, we identified 189 cases of depressive episodes against 186 with ICD-11. Five and two participants were respectively diagnosed only with ICD-10 and ICD-11. The weighted lifetime prevalence is identical using both diagnostic criteria (6.3 %).

Conclusion

Despite the changes introduced in the classification, the prevalence of depressive episodes identified by ICD-10 and ICD-11 in a general population sample is almost identical.

Abstract Image

背景世界卫生组织最近修订了《国际疾病分类》(ICD)中抑郁障碍的诊断标准。本研究旨在评估这些变化对普通人群抑郁发作诊断的影响。方法我们使用了 "Edad con Salud "项目中的普通人群样本(n = 2911;年龄,男 = 59;性别,56% 为女性),并根据《国际综合诊断访谈工具》(Composite International Diagnostic Interview Instrument)进行了面对面访谈。为了探究 ICD-10 和 ICD-11 之间的变化所产生的影响,我们比较了被诊断为抑郁障碍的参与者和未被诊断为抑郁障碍的参与者,以及仅在两个版本中的一个版本中出现抑郁的参与者。结果当使用 ICD-10 标准时,我们发现了 189 例抑郁发作病例,而使用 ICD-11 标准时则发现了 186 例。分别有 5 名和 2 名参与者仅被诊断为 ICD-10 和 ICD-11。结论尽管分类方法有所改变,但在普通人群样本中,ICD-10 和 ICD-11 所确定的抑郁发作流行率几乎相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信