Negative emotion differentiation, but not gastric interoception, is linked to “feeling fat” among women with elevated eating pathology

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Naomi G. Hill, K. Jean Forney
{"title":"Negative emotion differentiation, but not gastric interoception, is linked to “feeling fat” among women with elevated eating pathology","authors":"Naomi G. Hill,&nbsp;K. Jean Forney","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2025.101964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>“Feeling fat” is the subjective sensation of being overweight, which is not fully explained by one's body weight. Disruptions in emotion differentiation and gastric interoception may contribute to feeling fat. We hypothesized that poor negative emotion differentiation and poor gastric interoceptive accuracy would each be associated with higher levels of feeling fat after adjusting for negative affect intensity and body fat percentage. Cisgender female university students (N = 69; M(SD) age = 20.3(3.7), 60.9 % heterosexual, 91.3 % white) completed questionnaires and the two-step water load test. Regression analyses, which adjusted for negative affect intensity and body fat percentage, found that neither negative emotion differentiation (B &lt; 0.001, <em>p</em> = .52) nor gastric interoceptive accuracy (B = 0.01, <em>p</em> = .97) were related to feeling fat. Post hoc, eating pathology severity moderated the relationship between negative emotion differentiation and feeling fat (B = −6.97, <em>p</em> = .03); poorer negative emotion differentiation was associated with greater feeling fat for those with Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Global Scores above 1.47 (B = −5.79, <em>p</em> = .050). The relationship between gastric interoception and feeling fat did not vary by eating pathology severity (B = −0.04<em>, p</em> = .79). Self-reported feeling full also contributed to feeling fat after consuming water to perceived maximum fullness (<em>p</em> &lt; .001); however, <em>changes</em> in feeling full were not associated with changes in feeling fat across the task (<em>p</em> = .09). Poorer negative emotion differentiation is associated with feeling fat for those with elevated eating pathology. Individuals with elevated eating pathology may benefit from improving their ability to label and understand emotions to reduce feeling fat. Future research should test whether changes in feeling full cause feeling fat.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11476,"journal":{"name":"Eating behaviors","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101964"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015325000248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Feeling fat” is the subjective sensation of being overweight, which is not fully explained by one's body weight. Disruptions in emotion differentiation and gastric interoception may contribute to feeling fat. We hypothesized that poor negative emotion differentiation and poor gastric interoceptive accuracy would each be associated with higher levels of feeling fat after adjusting for negative affect intensity and body fat percentage. Cisgender female university students (N = 69; M(SD) age = 20.3(3.7), 60.9 % heterosexual, 91.3 % white) completed questionnaires and the two-step water load test. Regression analyses, which adjusted for negative affect intensity and body fat percentage, found that neither negative emotion differentiation (B < 0.001, p = .52) nor gastric interoceptive accuracy (B = 0.01, p = .97) were related to feeling fat. Post hoc, eating pathology severity moderated the relationship between negative emotion differentiation and feeling fat (B = −6.97, p = .03); poorer negative emotion differentiation was associated with greater feeling fat for those with Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Global Scores above 1.47 (B = −5.79, p = .050). The relationship between gastric interoception and feeling fat did not vary by eating pathology severity (B = −0.04, p = .79). Self-reported feeling full also contributed to feeling fat after consuming water to perceived maximum fullness (p < .001); however, changes in feeling full were not associated with changes in feeling fat across the task (p = .09). Poorer negative emotion differentiation is associated with feeling fat for those with elevated eating pathology. Individuals with elevated eating pathology may benefit from improving their ability to label and understand emotions to reduce feeling fat. Future research should test whether changes in feeling full cause feeling fat.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eating behaviors
Eating behaviors Multiple-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
65
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Eating Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing human research on the etiology, prevention, and treatment of obesity, binge eating, and eating disorders in adults and children. Studies related to the promotion of healthy eating patterns to treat or prevent medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cancer) are also acceptable. Two types of manuscripts are encouraged: (1) Descriptive studies establishing functional relationships between eating behaviors and social, cognitive, environmental, attitudinal, emotional or biochemical factors; (2) Clinical outcome research evaluating the efficacy of prevention or treatment protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信