Mitigating air quality and climate impact: A comprehensive analysis of paddy field burning emissions and green mechanisms for sustainable agriculture

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Achara Taweesan , Pichnaree Lalitaporn , Sirapong Sooktawee , Thongchai Kanabkaew
{"title":"Mitigating air quality and climate impact: A comprehensive analysis of paddy field burning emissions and green mechanisms for sustainable agriculture","authors":"Achara Taweesan ,&nbsp;Pichnaree Lalitaporn ,&nbsp;Sirapong Sooktawee ,&nbsp;Thongchai Kanabkaew","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Paddy field burning, a common practice post-harvest to clear agricultural residues, is widespread in rice-producing regions such as Thailand and ASEAN countries. This method releases significant pollutants, including particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) like black carbon (BC). These emissions degrade air quality, impacting human health and climate change. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of paddy field burning emissions in Thailand from 2018 to 2022, employing the ABC EIM (Atmospheric Brown Cloud Emission Inventory Manual) methodology for estimation. By integrating extensive literature data tailored to Thailand context, the study quantifies emissions to comprehend their variability and implications for climate change and air quality. Results reveal substantial emissions, particularly in central Thailand, where intensive rice cultivation occurs. For instance, average PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions are estimated at 21,056 tons/year (best estimate) with a possible range of 8118 to 318,972 tons/year as low- and high-estimates, respectively. Including GHGs and SLCPs, total CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent emissions amount to 9,718,883 and 4,811,860 tons/year for the 20-year and 100-year time horizons, respectively, with CH<sub>4</sub> and BC being major contributors. To address these issues, the study proposes green mechanisms as policy recommendations. Support mechanisms such as financial incentives, particularly carbon credits that account for GHGs and include SLCPs in short-cycle crops, are crucial for assisting farmers in adopting sustainable practices in crop residue management. This analysis provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders in Thailand and other ASEAN countries facing similar challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100662"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725000832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paddy field burning, a common practice post-harvest to clear agricultural residues, is widespread in rice-producing regions such as Thailand and ASEAN countries. This method releases significant pollutants, including particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4), and short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) like black carbon (BC). These emissions degrade air quality, impacting human health and climate change. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of paddy field burning emissions in Thailand from 2018 to 2022, employing the ABC EIM (Atmospheric Brown Cloud Emission Inventory Manual) methodology for estimation. By integrating extensive literature data tailored to Thailand context, the study quantifies emissions to comprehend their variability and implications for climate change and air quality. Results reveal substantial emissions, particularly in central Thailand, where intensive rice cultivation occurs. For instance, average PM2.5 emissions are estimated at 21,056 tons/year (best estimate) with a possible range of 8118 to 318,972 tons/year as low- and high-estimates, respectively. Including GHGs and SLCPs, total CO2 equivalent emissions amount to 9,718,883 and 4,811,860 tons/year for the 20-year and 100-year time horizons, respectively, with CH4 and BC being major contributors. To address these issues, the study proposes green mechanisms as policy recommendations. Support mechanisms such as financial incentives, particularly carbon credits that account for GHGs and include SLCPs in short-cycle crops, are crucial for assisting farmers in adopting sustainable practices in crop residue management. This analysis provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders in Thailand and other ASEAN countries facing similar challenges.
缓解空气质量和气候影响:水田燃烧排放和可持续农业绿色机制的综合分析
在泰国和东盟国家等产稻地区,烧水田是一种常见的做法,用于清除收获后的农业残留物。这种方法会释放大量污染物,包括颗粒物(PM2.5和PM10)、一氧化碳(CO)、挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)、二氧化碳(CO2)和甲烷(CH4)等温室气体(ghg),以及黑碳(BC)等短期气候污染物(SLCPs)。这些排放降低了空气质量,影响了人类健康和气候变化。本研究采用ABC EIM(大气棕色云排放清单手册)方法对泰国2018 - 2022年水田燃烧排放进行了综合分析。通过整合适合泰国国情的大量文献数据,该研究量化了排放量,以了解其可变性及其对气候变化和空气质量的影响。结果显示大量排放,特别是在泰国中部,密集种植水稻的地方。例如,PM2.5的平均排放量估计为21056吨/年(最佳估计),低估计和高估计的可能范围分别为8118至318972吨/年。包括温室气体和SLCPs在内,20年和100年的CO2当量排放总量分别为9,718,883和4,811,860吨/年,其中CH4和BC是主要贡献者。为了解决这些问题,本研究提出了绿色机制作为政策建议。财政激励等支持机制,特别是计入温室气体的碳信用额度,以及在短周期作物中纳入slcp,对于帮助农民在作物残留物管理中采用可持续做法至关重要。这一分析为泰国和其他面临类似挑战的东盟国家的决策者和利益相关者提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信