18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT for Predicting Benefit from Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

Ashwin Singh Parihar, Sofia Vaz, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Niharika Pant, Jan W. Schoones, Gary A. Ulaner
{"title":"18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT for Predicting Benefit from Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis","authors":"Ashwin Singh Parihar, Sofia Vaz, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Niharika Pant, Jan W. Schoones, Gary A. Ulaner","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.269163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><sup>18</sup>F-fluoroestradiol (<sup>18</sup>F-FES) PET/CT has been investigated as a potential biomarker to predict response to endocrine therapies in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. Although previous findings were promising, most had limited statistical significance because of small individual sample sizes. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and metaanalysis of the <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT literature to increase our power to evaluate the utility of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT as a biomarker for prediction of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. <strong>Methods:</strong> A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE via OVID, Embase, Web of Science, Emcare, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through November 1, 2024, for studies that included patients with ER-positive breast cancer who received an <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT at baseline and received subsequent endocrine therapy. For each eligible study, data were extracted using a predesigned data extraction form. Random effects models were used to estimate the likelihood of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy after a positive <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET scan, the likelihood of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy after a negative <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET scan, and the risk ratio of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy comparing those who were <sup>18</sup>F-FES–positive to those who were <sup>18</sup>F-FES–negative. <strong>Results:</strong> From 1,105 database records retrieved, 12 studies were included in the metaanalysis (<em>n</em> = 308 participants with data on <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET results and response to endocrine therapy). The likelihood of clinical benefit after a positive <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET scan was 66% (95% CI, 51%–79%; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 76.6%; <em>n</em> = 227 participants) and the likelihood after a negative <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET scan was 11% (95% CI, 3.5%–22%; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; <em>n</em> = 81 participants). The risk ratio of response that compared those who were <sup>18</sup>F-FES–positive with those who were <sup>18</sup>F-FES–negative was 3.21 (95% CI, 1.96–5.25; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET is a successful biomarker for predicting the likelihood of success of endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. There is strong evidence that patients with <sup>18</sup>F-FES–negative disease are unlikely to derive clinical benefit from endocrine therapies, despite the presence of ER-positive disease on pathology. This supports a role for <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET in identifying patients for whom endocrine therapy may or may not be an appropriate treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.269163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) PET/CT has been investigated as a potential biomarker to predict response to endocrine therapies in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. Although previous findings were promising, most had limited statistical significance because of small individual sample sizes. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and metaanalysis of the 18F-FES PET/CT literature to increase our power to evaluate the utility of 18F-FES PET/CT as a biomarker for prediction of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE via OVID, Embase, Web of Science, Emcare, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through November 1, 2024, for studies that included patients with ER-positive breast cancer who received an 18F-FES PET/CT at baseline and received subsequent endocrine therapy. For each eligible study, data were extracted using a predesigned data extraction form. Random effects models were used to estimate the likelihood of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy after a positive 18F-FES PET scan, the likelihood of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy after a negative 18F-FES PET scan, and the risk ratio of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy comparing those who were 18F-FES–positive to those who were 18F-FES–negative. Results: From 1,105 database records retrieved, 12 studies were included in the metaanalysis (n = 308 participants with data on 18F-FES PET results and response to endocrine therapy). The likelihood of clinical benefit after a positive 18F-FES PET scan was 66% (95% CI, 51%–79%; I2 = 76.6%; n = 227 participants) and the likelihood after a negative 18F-FES PET scan was 11% (95% CI, 3.5%–22%; I2 = 0.0%; n = 81 participants). The risk ratio of response that compared those who were 18F-FES–positive with those who were 18F-FES–negative was 3.21 (95% CI, 1.96–5.25; I2 = 0.0%; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: 18F-FES PET is a successful biomarker for predicting the likelihood of success of endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. There is strong evidence that patients with 18F-FES–negative disease are unlikely to derive clinical benefit from endocrine therapies, despite the presence of ER-positive disease on pathology. This supports a role for 18F-FES PET in identifying patients for whom endocrine therapy may or may not be an appropriate treatment option.

18f -氟雌二醇PET/CT预测雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者接受内分泌治疗的获益:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
18f -氟雌二醇(18F-FES) PET/CT已被研究作为预测雌激素受体(ER)阳性乳腺癌患者对内分泌治疗反应的潜在生物标志物。虽然以前的研究结果很有希望,但由于个体样本量小,大多数研究的统计意义有限。因此,我们对18F-FES PET/CT文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以提高我们评估18F-FES PET/CT作为预测雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗临床获益的生物标志物的效用。方法:通过多个数据库进行全面的文献检索,包括PubMed、MEDLINE(通过OVID、Embase、Web of Science、Emcare和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials),检索截至2024年11月1日的研究,纳入er阳性乳腺癌患者,这些患者在基线时接受了18F-FES PET/CT检查,并接受了随后的内分泌治疗。对于每个符合条件的研究,使用预先设计的数据提取表提取数据。随机效应模型用于估计18F-FES PET扫描阳性后内分泌治疗的临床获益可能性,18F-FES PET扫描阴性后内分泌治疗的临床获益可能性,以及比较18F-FES阳性和18F-FES阴性患者的内分泌治疗临床获益风险比。结果:从检索到的1105个数据库记录中,12项研究被纳入荟萃分析(n = 308名参与者,数据包括18F-FES PET结果和对内分泌治疗的反应)。18F-FES PET扫描阳性后临床获益的可能性为66% (95% CI, 51%-79%;I2 = 76.6%;n = 227名参与者),18F-FES PET扫描阴性后的可能性为11% (95% CI, 3.5%-22%;I2 = 0.0%;N = 81名参与者)。18f - fes阳性患者与18f - fes阴性患者的反应风险比为3.21 (95% CI, 1.96-5.25;I2 = 0.0%;P & lt;0.0001)。结论:18F-FES PET是预测er阳性乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗成功可能性的一种成功的生物标志物。有强有力的证据表明,尽管病理上存在er阳性疾病,但18f - fes阴性疾病患者不太可能从内分泌治疗中获得临床益处。这支持了18F-FES PET在确定内分泌治疗可能是或不适合治疗选择的患者中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信