Posttraumatic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Machine Learning Comparison Between Surgery and Nonoperative Management

Yining Lu, Kevin Jurgensmeier, Abhinav Lamba, Linjun Yang, Mario Hevesi, Christopher L. Camp, Aaron J. Krych, Michael J. Stuart
{"title":"Posttraumatic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Machine Learning Comparison Between Surgery and Nonoperative Management","authors":"Yining Lu, Kevin Jurgensmeier, Abhinav Lamba, Linjun Yang, Mario Hevesi, Christopher L. Camp, Aaron J. Krych, Michael J. Stuart","doi":"10.1177/03635465251322803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nonoperative and operative management techniques after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are both appropriate treatment options for selected patients. However, the subsequent development of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA) remains an area of active study. Purpose: To compare the risk of PTOA between patients treated without surgery and with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) after primary ACL disruption using a machine learning causal inference model. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A geographic database identified patients undergoing ACLR between 1990 and 2016 with minimum 7.5-year follow-up. Variables collected include age, sex, body mass index, activity level, occupation, relevant comorbid diagnoses, radiographic findings, injury characteristics, and clinical course. Treatment effects of ACLR on the development of PTOA and progression to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were analyzed with machine learning models (MLMs) in a causal inference estimator (targeted maximum likelihood estimation, TMLE), while controlling for confounders. Results: The study included 1194 patients with a minimum follow-up of 7.5 years, among whom 974 underwent primary reconstruction and 220 underwent nonoperative treatment. A total of 215 (22%) patients developed symptomatic PTOA in the ACLR group compared with 140 (64%) in the nonoperative treatment group ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .001), whereas 25 (3%) patients underwent TKA in the ACLR group compared with 50 (23%) in the nonoperative treatment group ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .001). Patients in the ACLR group had delayed TKA compared with patients in the nonoperative treatment group (193.4 vs 166.0 months, respectively; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02). TMLE evaluation revealed that reconstruction decreased the risk of PTOA by 11% (95% CI, 8%-13%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .001) compared with nonoperative treatment but did not demonstrate a significant effect on the rate of progression to TKA. Survival analysis with random forest algorithm demonstrated significant delay to the onset of PTOA as well as time to progression of TKA in patients undergoing ACLR. Additional risk factors for the development of PTOA, irrespective of treatment, included older age at injury, greater body mass index, total number of arthroscopic knee surgeries, and residual laxity at follow-up. Conclusion: MLMs in a causal inference estimator found ACLR to exert a significant treatment effect in reducing the rate of development of PTOA by 11% compared with nonoperative treatment. ACLR also delayed the onset of PTOA and progression to TKA.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251322803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonoperative and operative management techniques after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are both appropriate treatment options for selected patients. However, the subsequent development of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA) remains an area of active study. Purpose: To compare the risk of PTOA between patients treated without surgery and with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) after primary ACL disruption using a machine learning causal inference model. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A geographic database identified patients undergoing ACLR between 1990 and 2016 with minimum 7.5-year follow-up. Variables collected include age, sex, body mass index, activity level, occupation, relevant comorbid diagnoses, radiographic findings, injury characteristics, and clinical course. Treatment effects of ACLR on the development of PTOA and progression to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were analyzed with machine learning models (MLMs) in a causal inference estimator (targeted maximum likelihood estimation, TMLE), while controlling for confounders. Results: The study included 1194 patients with a minimum follow-up of 7.5 years, among whom 974 underwent primary reconstruction and 220 underwent nonoperative treatment. A total of 215 (22%) patients developed symptomatic PTOA in the ACLR group compared with 140 (64%) in the nonoperative treatment group ( P < .001), whereas 25 (3%) patients underwent TKA in the ACLR group compared with 50 (23%) in the nonoperative treatment group ( P < .001). Patients in the ACLR group had delayed TKA compared with patients in the nonoperative treatment group (193.4 vs 166.0 months, respectively; P = .02). TMLE evaluation revealed that reconstruction decreased the risk of PTOA by 11% (95% CI, 8%-13%; P < .001) compared with nonoperative treatment but did not demonstrate a significant effect on the rate of progression to TKA. Survival analysis with random forest algorithm demonstrated significant delay to the onset of PTOA as well as time to progression of TKA in patients undergoing ACLR. Additional risk factors for the development of PTOA, irrespective of treatment, included older age at injury, greater body mass index, total number of arthroscopic knee surgeries, and residual laxity at follow-up. Conclusion: MLMs in a causal inference estimator found ACLR to exert a significant treatment effect in reducing the rate of development of PTOA by 11% compared with nonoperative treatment. ACLR also delayed the onset of PTOA and progression to TKA.
前交叉韧带损伤后创伤性关节炎:手术与非手术治疗的机器学习比较
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后非手术和手术处理技术都是合适的治疗选择。然而,创伤后膝骨关节炎(pta)的后续发展仍然是一个活跃的研究领域。目的:利用机器学习因果推理模型比较原发性ACL断裂后不手术治疗和ACL重建(ACLR)患者的睑下垂风险。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:一个地理数据库确定了1990年至2016年间接受ACLR的患者,随访时间至少为7.5年。收集的变量包括年龄、性别、体重指数、活动水平、职业、相关合并症诊断、影像学表现、损伤特征和临床病程。在控制混杂因素的情况下,在因果推理估计器(目标最大似然估计,TMLE)中使用机器学习模型(MLMs)分析ACLR对PTOA发展和进展到全膝关节置换术(TKA)的治疗效果。结果:本研究纳入1194例患者,随访时间最短为7.5年,其中974例进行了初步重建,220例进行了非手术治疗。ACLR组共有215例(22%)患者出现症状性上睑下垂,而非手术治疗组为140例(64%)(P <;.001),而ACLR组25例(3%)患者接受了TKA,而非手术治疗组为50例(23%)(P <;措施)。与非手术治疗组相比,ACLR组患者延迟TKA(分别为193.4个月和166.0个月;P = .02)。TMLE评估显示,重建使pta的风险降低11% (95% CI, 8%-13%;P & lt;.001)与非手术治疗相比,但对进展为TKA的速度没有显著影响。随机森林算法的生存分析显示,ACLR患者的PTOA发病时间和TKA进展时间均有显著延迟。不论治疗方式如何,发生pta的其他危险因素包括:受伤时年龄较大、体重指数较大、膝关节镜手术总数和随访时的残余松弛。结论:MLMs在因果推理估计中发现,与非手术治疗相比,ACLR具有显著的治疗效果,可将pta的发展率降低11%。ACLR也延迟了pta的发病和向TKA的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信