Rita Pingree, Susanne Markendorf, Dimitrios Moysidis, Christoph Ryffel, Magdalena Stuetz, Raffael Ghenzi, Marko Gajic, Dominik C. Benz, Aju P. Pazhenkottil, Andreas A. Giannopoulos, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Simon Winther, Ronny R. Buechel
{"title":"Myocardial blood flow reference values for 13N-ammonia PET myocardial perfusion imaging in patients without flow-limiting coronary artery disease","authors":"Rita Pingree, Susanne Markendorf, Dimitrios Moysidis, Christoph Ryffel, Magdalena Stuetz, Raffael Ghenzi, Marko Gajic, Dominik C. Benz, Aju P. Pazhenkottil, Andreas A. Giannopoulos, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Simon Winther, Ronny R. Buechel","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07196-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To determine the most important patient factors influencing quantitative MBF and to report the lower (LRL) and upper (URL) reference limits for 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Patients who underwent 13N-ammonia PET-MPI were screened, and those with evidence of myocardial ischemia or scar, known cardiomyopathy, impaired left ventricular function, non-response to vasodilators, and those who underwent a stress-rest protocol were excluded. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of rest MBF (rMBF), stress MBF (sMBF), and myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and predictor importance was calculated. Finally, median, LRL, and URL for rMBF, sMBF, and MFR were calculated based on the presence of predictors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Among 784 patients with a median coronary artery calcium score (CACS) of 69, median rMBF was 0.75mL∙min<sup>− 1</sup>∙g<sup>− 1</sup> (LRL = 0.49 mL∙min<sup>− 1</sup>∙g<sup>− 1</sup>; URL = 1.33 mL∙min<sup>− 1</sup>∙g<sup>− 1</sup>), median sMBF was 2.41mL∙min<sup>− 1</sup>∙g<sup>− 1</sup> (LRL = 1.42 mL∙min<sup>− 1</sup>∙g<sup>− 1</sup>; URL = 3.73 mL∙min<sup>− 1</sup>∙g<sup>− 1</sup>), and median MFR was 3.09 (LRL = 2.11; URL = 4.65). The body mass index (BMI) was the single most important independent predictor of rMBF, sMBF, and MFR (predictor importance of 72%, 87%, and 41%, respectively; standardized β=-0.434, -0.566 and − 0.174, respectively). Additional predictors were sex and hypertension for rMBF, sex for sMBF, and hypertension and CACS for MFR.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>In patients without flow-limiting CAD, MBF is strongly influenced by the patient’s habitus, whereby median and reference limits for sMBF and rMBF decrease with increasing BMI. Consequently, MFR exhibits stable lower reference limits across a wide range of BMI and may be considered the most robust quantitative parameter derived from 13N-ammonia PET-MPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"213 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07196-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To determine the most important patient factors influencing quantitative MBF and to report the lower (LRL) and upper (URL) reference limits for 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).
Methods
Patients who underwent 13N-ammonia PET-MPI were screened, and those with evidence of myocardial ischemia or scar, known cardiomyopathy, impaired left ventricular function, non-response to vasodilators, and those who underwent a stress-rest protocol were excluded. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of rest MBF (rMBF), stress MBF (sMBF), and myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and predictor importance was calculated. Finally, median, LRL, and URL for rMBF, sMBF, and MFR were calculated based on the presence of predictors.
Results
Among 784 patients with a median coronary artery calcium score (CACS) of 69, median rMBF was 0.75mL∙min− 1∙g− 1 (LRL = 0.49 mL∙min− 1∙g− 1; URL = 1.33 mL∙min− 1∙g− 1), median sMBF was 2.41mL∙min− 1∙g− 1 (LRL = 1.42 mL∙min− 1∙g− 1; URL = 3.73 mL∙min− 1∙g− 1), and median MFR was 3.09 (LRL = 2.11; URL = 4.65). The body mass index (BMI) was the single most important independent predictor of rMBF, sMBF, and MFR (predictor importance of 72%, 87%, and 41%, respectively; standardized β=-0.434, -0.566 and − 0.174, respectively). Additional predictors were sex and hypertension for rMBF, sex for sMBF, and hypertension and CACS for MFR.
Conclusion
In patients without flow-limiting CAD, MBF is strongly influenced by the patient’s habitus, whereby median and reference limits for sMBF and rMBF decrease with increasing BMI. Consequently, MFR exhibits stable lower reference limits across a wide range of BMI and may be considered the most robust quantitative parameter derived from 13N-ammonia PET-MPI.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.