Employment Trajectories of Recently Certified Peer Support Specialists: A Longitudinal Qualitative Analysis.

Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1177/29767342251322243
Elizabeth Siantz, Morgan Pelot, Laysha Ostrow
{"title":"Employment Trajectories of Recently Certified Peer Support Specialists: A Longitudinal Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Elizabeth Siantz, Morgan Pelot, Laysha Ostrow","doi":"10.1177/29767342251322243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent work has highlighted the challenges and benefits that certified peer specialists (CPSs) experience in the workforce. While their work can lead to personal fulfillment and financial independence for CPSs, and improved mental health and substance use recovery outcomes for their clients, little is known about CPS employment trajectories or the circumstances that impact their early-career workforce involvement over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used within- and across-case analyses of longitudinal data from qualitative interviews with 13 CPS that participated in a multistate, 3 year observational prospective cohort study of CPS graduates to explore employment changes and circumstances that led to these transitions. Qualitative results were organized according to whether cases were \"employed as a CPS at follow-up\" (N = 5) or \"not employed as CPS at follow-up\" (N = 8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants \"employed as a CPS\" at follow-up held various positions following certification, and they shared a sense of optimism about their future work. At the second interview, most remained in the same positions they held at baseline and described personal fulfillment and a supportive work environment as reasons for remaining. Participants who were \"not employed as a CPS\" at follow-up were also not employed as a CPS at their baseline interview but aspired to pursue future CPS work. At their second interview, many remained unemployed due to poor health and disability, or described past traumatic experiences, stress, and burnout related to being a CPS as reasons for leaving the CPS work force. All participants were challenged to find work as a CPS at various moments in their trajectories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicate that securing employment as a CPS was challenging for participants. Findings are discussed with implications for supporting CPS job seeking, well-being, and workforce retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"624-632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251322243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent work has highlighted the challenges and benefits that certified peer specialists (CPSs) experience in the workforce. While their work can lead to personal fulfillment and financial independence for CPSs, and improved mental health and substance use recovery outcomes for their clients, little is known about CPS employment trajectories or the circumstances that impact their early-career workforce involvement over time.

Methods: This study used within- and across-case analyses of longitudinal data from qualitative interviews with 13 CPS that participated in a multistate, 3 year observational prospective cohort study of CPS graduates to explore employment changes and circumstances that led to these transitions. Qualitative results were organized according to whether cases were "employed as a CPS at follow-up" (N = 5) or "not employed as CPS at follow-up" (N = 8).

Results: Participants "employed as a CPS" at follow-up held various positions following certification, and they shared a sense of optimism about their future work. At the second interview, most remained in the same positions they held at baseline and described personal fulfillment and a supportive work environment as reasons for remaining. Participants who were "not employed as a CPS" at follow-up were also not employed as a CPS at their baseline interview but aspired to pursue future CPS work. At their second interview, many remained unemployed due to poor health and disability, or described past traumatic experiences, stress, and burnout related to being a CPS as reasons for leaving the CPS work force. All participants were challenged to find work as a CPS at various moments in their trajectories.

Conclusion: Results indicate that securing employment as a CPS was challenging for participants. Findings are discussed with implications for supporting CPS job seeking, well-being, and workforce retention.

最近认证的同伴支持专家的就业轨迹:纵向定性分析。
背景:最近的工作强调了认证同行专家(cps)在工作中遇到的挑战和好处。虽然他们的工作可以为CPS带来个人成就感和经济独立,并改善客户的心理健康和物质使用恢复结果,但人们对CPS的就业轨迹或随着时间的推移影响他们早期职业生涯劳动力参与的情况知之甚少。方法:本研究对13名CPS的纵向定性访谈数据进行了案例内和跨案例分析,这些CPS参与了一项多州的、为期3年的观察性前瞻性CPS毕业生队列研究,以探索导致这些转变的就业变化和环境。根据“随访时受雇为CPS”(N = 5)和“随访时未受雇为CPS”(N = 8)对定性结果进行整理。结果:“受雇为CPS”的参与者在获得认证后担任了不同的职位,并对未来的工作持乐观态度。在第二次面试中,大多数人仍然保持着他们在基线时的职位,并将个人成就感和支持性的工作环境描述为留下来的原因。在随访中“未受雇为CPS”的参与者在基线访谈中也未受雇为CPS,但他们渴望从事未来的CPS工作。在第二次采访中,许多人由于健康状况不佳和残疾而失业,或将过去与CPS有关的创伤经历、压力和倦怠描述为离开CPS工作队伍的原因。所有参与者都被要求在他们人生轨迹的不同时刻找到一份CPS的工作。结论:结果表明,确保就业作为CPS是具有挑战性的参与者。研究结果讨论了支持CPS求职,福利和劳动力保留的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信