Evaluation of the surgical informed consent for elective and emergency surgeries in obstetrics and gynaecology in Saudi Arabia.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Maryam Al-Meshkhas, Zahraa Alakrawi, Sumaiah Alrawiai
{"title":"Evaluation of the surgical informed consent for elective and emergency surgeries in obstetrics and gynaecology in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Maryam Al-Meshkhas, Zahraa Alakrawi, Sumaiah Alrawiai","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01159-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informed consent (IC) represents one of the fundamental rights of patients in healthcare. An essential aspect of the IC process is providing patients with equal access to information to enable them to make the right decisions. However, failure to obtain IC undermines patient autonomy, lowers patient satisfaction, increases risks, and negatively affects the patient's trust in healthcare providers. This study aims to evaluate the surgical informed consent (SIC) process from the patient's perspective both for emergency and elective surgeries in obstetrics/genecology in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a quantitative cross-sectional study. The study population included all hospitalized female patients who had undergone obstetric or gynaecological surgeries, from February 2021 to March 2021. The total sample size was 156 female patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the participants were married (96.2%) and unemployed (80.1%). The most performed surgery was caesarean Sect. (84%). Most of the patients were satisfied with their SIC experience which represents over 85%. No significant difference has been found between the elective and emergency surgeries. However, person-in-charge of SIC administration and the time provided to sign the IC were deemed to be significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings, it is recommended that physician take responsibility for the SIC administration rather than an unknown provider. It is also recommended to provide the patients with adequate time to understand the SIC. Furthermore, ensuring the availability of emotional support is critical for enhancing the patient experience.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01159-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Informed consent (IC) represents one of the fundamental rights of patients in healthcare. An essential aspect of the IC process is providing patients with equal access to information to enable them to make the right decisions. However, failure to obtain IC undermines patient autonomy, lowers patient satisfaction, increases risks, and negatively affects the patient's trust in healthcare providers. This study aims to evaluate the surgical informed consent (SIC) process from the patient's perspective both for emergency and elective surgeries in obstetrics/genecology in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This is a quantitative cross-sectional study. The study population included all hospitalized female patients who had undergone obstetric or gynaecological surgeries, from February 2021 to March 2021. The total sample size was 156 female patients.

Results: Most of the participants were married (96.2%) and unemployed (80.1%). The most performed surgery was caesarean Sect. (84%). Most of the patients were satisfied with their SIC experience which represents over 85%. No significant difference has been found between the elective and emergency surgeries. However, person-in-charge of SIC administration and the time provided to sign the IC were deemed to be significant predictors.

Conclusion: Based on the findings, it is recommended that physician take responsibility for the SIC administration rather than an unknown provider. It is also recommended to provide the patients with adequate time to understand the SIC. Furthermore, ensuring the availability of emotional support is critical for enhancing the patient experience.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信