Benefits and Accuracy of Real-Time CGM in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Attending Summer Camp: Second Year.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Tatsuya Kondo, Takafumi Senokuchi, Mayumi Yano, Haruo Takeda, Kenro Nishida, Yutaka Kai, Naoto Kubota
{"title":"Benefits and Accuracy of Real-Time CGM in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Attending Summer Camp: Second Year.","authors":"Tatsuya Kondo, Takafumi Senokuchi, Mayumi Yano, Haruo Takeda, Kenro Nishida, Yutaka Kai, Naoto Kubota","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In 2023, we employed Dexcom G6 for real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM); it showed high usefulness but unsatisfactory accuracy in summer camp (camp) participants with type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the usefulness, recommendation, and accuracy of a new rt-CGM system in camp participants in 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sensor glucose (SG) concentrations were measured by Dexcom G7 (G7) from 6 days prior to camp. Usefulness and recommendation were assessed by questionnaire. A total of 21 children with type 1 diabetes and 52 healthcare providers (HCPs) participated. CGM-associated metrics were measured 6 days prior to camp (off camp: 6 days) and during camp (on camp: 2 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>G7 was rated highly for its sensor insertion, visualization of SG variation, and convenience during camp. The SG value accuracy scored relatively low. G7's usefulness and recommendation among campers were significantly higher than those of G6, utilized the previous year, and they were both almost equally highly rated by HCPs. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 11.3% (G6: 16.0%) on camp and 11.0% (G6: 19.7%) off camp. The coefficient of variation was 34.4% (G6: 60.3%) on camp and 35.9% (G6: 63.1%) off camp, while the glucose management indicator was 7.44% for G7 (G6: 8.04%). The glycemic management metrics on camp were better than those off camp. Graphical analyses also showed sufficient accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>G7 was rated higher in usefulness and recommendation than G6 among participants. G7 also exhibited improved accuracy and was considered a useful rt-CGM tool in a camp setting. Glucose management on camp was significantly improved because of the multi-directional efforts of the HCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"3074-3083"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: In 2023, we employed Dexcom G6 for real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM); it showed high usefulness but unsatisfactory accuracy in summer camp (camp) participants with type 1 diabetes.

Objective: To assess the usefulness, recommendation, and accuracy of a new rt-CGM system in camp participants in 2024.

Methods: Sensor glucose (SG) concentrations were measured by Dexcom G7 (G7) from 6 days prior to camp. Usefulness and recommendation were assessed by questionnaire. A total of 21 children with type 1 diabetes and 52 healthcare providers (HCPs) participated. CGM-associated metrics were measured 6 days prior to camp (off camp: 6 days) and during camp (on camp: 2 days).

Results: G7 was rated highly for its sensor insertion, visualization of SG variation, and convenience during camp. The SG value accuracy scored relatively low. G7's usefulness and recommendation among campers were significantly higher than those of G6, utilized the previous year, and they were both almost equally highly rated by HCPs. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 11.3% (G6: 16.0%) on camp and 11.0% (G6: 19.7%) off camp. The coefficient of variation was 34.4% (G6: 60.3%) on camp and 35.9% (G6: 63.1%) off camp, while the glucose management indicator was 7.44% for G7 (G6: 8.04%). The glycemic management metrics on camp were better than those off camp. Graphical analyses also showed sufficient accuracy.

Conclusion: G7 was rated higher in usefulness and recommendation than G6 among participants. G7 also exhibited improved accuracy and was considered a useful rt-CGM tool in a camp setting. Glucose management on camp was significantly improved because of the multi-directional efforts of the HCPs.

参加夏令营的儿童和青少年1型糖尿病患者实时CGM的益处和准确性:第二年。
背景:2023年,我们采用Dexcom G6进行实时连续血糖监测(rt-CGM);它在1型糖尿病夏令营参与者中显示出很高的有用性,但准确性不理想。目的:评价一种新的rt-CGM系统在2024营地的实用性、推荐率和准确性。方法:camp前6 d用Dexcom G7 (G7)法测定传感器葡萄糖(SG)浓度。通过问卷评估有用性和推荐性。21名1型糖尿病儿童和52名医疗保健提供者(HCPs)参与了研究。cgm相关指标在营前6天(营外6天)和营中(营内2天)测量。结果:G7在传感器的插入、SG变化的可视化和营地中的便捷性方面获得了很高的评价。SG值精度得分相对较低。在露营者中,G7的有用性和推荐度明显高于去年使用的G6, hcp对它们的评价几乎一样高。平均绝对相对差(MARD)在营地为11.3% (G6: 16.0%),在营地外为11.0% (G6: 19.7%)。camp组的变异系数为34.4% (G6: 60.3%), camp组的变异系数为35.9% (G6: 63.1%), G7组的血糖管理指标为7.44% (G6: 8.04%)。营地内血糖管理指标优于营地外。图形分析也显示出足够的准确性。结论:被试对G7的有用性和推荐度评价高于G6。G7也表现出更高的准确性,被认为是营地设置中有用的rt-CGM工具。由于HCPs的多方位努力,camp的葡萄糖管理得到了显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信