Outcome of Conservative Treatment of Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients Over 80 Years Old.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593251315589
Andrea Speldova, Josef Vcelak, Lukas F Mirchi, Lucie Sedova, Ondrej Seda
{"title":"Outcome of Conservative Treatment of Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients Over 80 Years Old.","authors":"Andrea Speldova, Josef Vcelak, Lukas F Mirchi, Lucie Sedova, Ondrej Seda","doi":"10.1177/21514593251315589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The retrospective study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative treatment for type II odontoid C2 fractures in octogenerians. The study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and quality of survival of patients treated using conservative methods. Additionally, the study sought to define radiological outcomes, fracture healing success and the development of complications in correlation with clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥80 with dens C2 fracture were fixed with a hard cervical collar for 6 weeks, followed by early mobilization. Patients showing delayed fracture healing on computed tomography (CT) scan were subsequently immobilized in a soft neck collar for additional 6 weeks. The follow-up CT scan was then performed with consequential rehabilitation. Patients with nonunion of the C2 on the follow-up CT scan and clinical symptoms were contraindicated for physical rehabilitation for cervical spine till next CT scan after another 12 weeks. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed during follow-up visits, with a median follow-up was 109 days, with the range extending from 1 day to 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 33 patients were included in the study and were followed for 1 year. The 30-day mortality rate was 21.2%, and between 30 days and one year post-treatment, it was 18.2%. Mortality was higher during the study period in displaced fractures (>2 mm; 9 out of 16 patients died) compared to non-displaced fractures (≤2 mm; 4 out of 17 patients died). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score remained unchanged between admission (mean 16.9; SD ± 0.5) and the end of follow-up (mean 16.9; SD ± 0.5; <i>P</i> > 0.05), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score showed improvement from values measured upon admission to the hospital (mean 7.97; SD ± 1.33) to values measured at the end of follow-up (mean 1.58; SD ± 1.62; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) showed a statistically significant difference between admission (mean 41.3; SD ± 14.92) and the end of follow-up (mean 14.29; SD ± 4.65; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The standard measurement of Posterior Atlantodental Interval (PADI) had an average value of 18.6 (range 16-22 mm) and primary bony union of odontoid fractures occurred in eleven cases (33.3%), while six patients (18.2%) had fibrous union with minimal clinical difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of conservative treatment for odontoid fractures in octogenerians and underscores the critical role of conservative management in a polymorbid elderly population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"16 ","pages":"21514593251315589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593251315589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The retrospective study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative treatment for type II odontoid C2 fractures in octogenerians. The study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and quality of survival of patients treated using conservative methods. Additionally, the study sought to define radiological outcomes, fracture healing success and the development of complications in correlation with clinical outcomes.

Materials and methods: Patients aged ≥80 with dens C2 fracture were fixed with a hard cervical collar for 6 weeks, followed by early mobilization. Patients showing delayed fracture healing on computed tomography (CT) scan were subsequently immobilized in a soft neck collar for additional 6 weeks. The follow-up CT scan was then performed with consequential rehabilitation. Patients with nonunion of the C2 on the follow-up CT scan and clinical symptoms were contraindicated for physical rehabilitation for cervical spine till next CT scan after another 12 weeks. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed during follow-up visits, with a median follow-up was 109 days, with the range extending from 1 day to 1 year.

Results: In total, 33 patients were included in the study and were followed for 1 year. The 30-day mortality rate was 21.2%, and between 30 days and one year post-treatment, it was 18.2%. Mortality was higher during the study period in displaced fractures (>2 mm; 9 out of 16 patients died) compared to non-displaced fractures (≤2 mm; 4 out of 17 patients died). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score remained unchanged between admission (mean 16.9; SD ± 0.5) and the end of follow-up (mean 16.9; SD ± 0.5; P > 0.05), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score showed improvement from values measured upon admission to the hospital (mean 7.97; SD ± 1.33) to values measured at the end of follow-up (mean 1.58; SD ± 1.62; P < 0.001) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) showed a statistically significant difference between admission (mean 41.3; SD ± 14.92) and the end of follow-up (mean 14.29; SD ± 4.65; P < 0.001). The standard measurement of Posterior Atlantodental Interval (PADI) had an average value of 18.6 (range 16-22 mm) and primary bony union of odontoid fractures occurred in eleven cases (33.3%), while six patients (18.2%) had fibrous union with minimal clinical difficulties.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of conservative treatment for odontoid fractures in octogenerians and underscores the critical role of conservative management in a polymorbid elderly population.

80岁以上老年患者齿状突骨折保守治疗的疗效分析。
简介:回顾性研究评估保守治疗80多岁II型齿状突C2骨折的临床和影像学结果。该研究旨在评估使用保守方法治疗的患者的临床结果和生存质量。此外,该研究试图确定与临床结果相关的放射学结果、骨折愈合成功和并发症的发展。材料与方法:年龄≥80岁的牙槽C2骨折患者采用硬颈套固定6周,早期活动。计算机断层扫描(CT)显示骨折愈合延迟的患者随后在软颈圈内固定6周。随后进行CT扫描和相应的康复治疗。随访CT显示C2骨不连及临床症状的患者,12周后再进行颈椎物理康复治疗。随访期间进行临床和影像学评估,中位随访时间为109天,随访时间从1天到1年不等。结果:共纳入33例患者,随访1年。治疗后30天死亡率为21.2%,30天至1年死亡率为18.2%。在研究期间,移位骨折的死亡率较高(bbb20 mm;16例患者中有9例死亡)与非移位骨折(≤2mm;17例患者中4例死亡)。入院期间,日本骨科协会(JOA)评分保持不变(平均16.9分;SD±0.5)和随访结束(平均16.9;Sd±0.5;P < 0.05),视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分较入院时有所改善(平均7.97;SD±1.33)与随访结束时的测量值(平均1.58;Sd±1.62;P < 0.001)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)在两组间差异有统计学意义(平均41.3;SD±14.92)和随访结束(平均14.29;Sd±4.65;P < 0.001)。后寰齿间隙(PADI)的标准测量值平均为18.6(范围16-22 mm), 11例(33.3%)发生齿状突骨折的原发性骨愈合,6例(18.2%)发生纤维性愈合,临床困难最小。结论:本研究证明了保守治疗老年齿状突骨折的安全性和有效性,并强调了保守治疗在多病老年人群中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信