Ultra-Processed Foods Marketed in Türkiye: An Analysis of Nutritional Quality and Packaging Sustainability.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Hilal Şimşek, Armineh Rajabi, Büşra Öztürk, Aslı Uçar
{"title":"Ultra-Processed Foods Marketed in Türkiye: An Analysis of Nutritional Quality and Packaging Sustainability.","authors":"Hilal Şimşek, Armineh Rajabi, Büşra Öztürk, Aslı Uçar","doi":"10.1111/nbu.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional profile and packaging recycling status of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) sold in chain markets across Türkiye. In this regard, the nutritional quality and recyclability status of the packages of UPFs, as defined by NOVA, sold in five major supermarket chains across Türkiye were examined. The energy and nutrient content displayed on UPF labels were analysed, and their nutritional profiles considered using the Nutri-Score algorithm. The study also documented the frequency of recycling symbols on the packaging. Of the 1365 UPFs examined across 13 categories, 61.6% were identified as having an unhealthy nutritional profile (Nutri-Score Grades D and E), whereas only 16% were classified as healthy (Grades A and B). Categories predominantly containing unhealthy products included milk and dairy, sauces and dressings, frozen and dehydrated meals, processed meats, along with various snacks and desserts like salty and sweet snacks, candies, chocolates and ice cream. Notably, candies, chocolates, and salty and sweet snacks were identified as the most energy-dense UPF categories. In terms of packaging, 84.4% of UPFs used at least one recycling symbol, 55.3% of these used plastic material and 38.2% used the Green Dot symbol. The results of the study may guide UPF nutrient profile reformulations and contribute to epidemiological studies analysing the relationship between UPF consumption and public health. Furthermore, these results highlight the necessity for more defined national regulations on the recycling of food packaging within the context of food system sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48536,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional profile and packaging recycling status of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) sold in chain markets across Türkiye. In this regard, the nutritional quality and recyclability status of the packages of UPFs, as defined by NOVA, sold in five major supermarket chains across Türkiye were examined. The energy and nutrient content displayed on UPF labels were analysed, and their nutritional profiles considered using the Nutri-Score algorithm. The study also documented the frequency of recycling symbols on the packaging. Of the 1365 UPFs examined across 13 categories, 61.6% were identified as having an unhealthy nutritional profile (Nutri-Score Grades D and E), whereas only 16% were classified as healthy (Grades A and B). Categories predominantly containing unhealthy products included milk and dairy, sauces and dressings, frozen and dehydrated meals, processed meats, along with various snacks and desserts like salty and sweet snacks, candies, chocolates and ice cream. Notably, candies, chocolates, and salty and sweet snacks were identified as the most energy-dense UPF categories. In terms of packaging, 84.4% of UPFs used at least one recycling symbol, 55.3% of these used plastic material and 38.2% used the Green Dot symbol. The results of the study may guide UPF nutrient profile reformulations and contribute to epidemiological studies analysing the relationship between UPF consumption and public health. Furthermore, these results highlight the necessity for more defined national regulations on the recycling of food packaging within the context of food system sustainability.

在日本销售的超加工食品:营养质量和包装可持续性分析。
本研究旨在评估 rkiye连锁市场销售的超加工食品(upf)的营养概况和包装回收状况。在这方面,研究人员检查了全国五大连锁超市销售的由NOVA定义的upf包装的营养质量和可回收性状况。分析UPF标签上显示的能量和营养含量,并使用nutrition - score算法考虑其营养概况。该研究还记录了包装上回收标志的频率。在13个类别的1365个upf中,61.6%被确定为具有不健康的营养状况(营养评分等级D和E),而只有16%被归类为健康(等级A和B)。主要含有不健康产品的类别包括牛奶和乳制品、酱汁和调味品、冷冻和脱水食品、加工肉类,以及各种零食和甜点,如咸点心和甜食、糖果、巧克力和冰淇淋。值得注意的是,糖果、巧克力、咸味和甜味零食被确定为能量密度最高的UPF类别。在包装方面,84.4%的upf使用至少一个回收标志,其中55.3%使用塑料材料,38.2%使用绿点标志。这项研究的结果可以指导UPF营养成分的重新配制,并有助于分析UPF消费与公众健康之间关系的流行病学研究。此外,这些结果强调了在食品系统可持续性的背景下,对食品包装回收制定更明确的国家法规的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition Bulletin
Nutrition Bulletin NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Nutrition Bulletin provides accessible reviews at the cutting edge of research. Read by researchers and nutritionists working in universities and research institutes; public health nutritionists, dieticians and other health professionals; nutritionists, technologists and others in the food industry; those engaged in higher education including students; and journalists with an interest in nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信