How adolescent tobacco use has responded to state tobacco 21 laws and flavor restrictions.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Summer Sherburne Hawkins, Rebekah Levine Coley, Lindsay Lanteri, Christopher F Baum
{"title":"How adolescent tobacco use has responded to state tobacco 21 laws and flavor restrictions.","authors":"Summer Sherburne Hawkins, Rebekah Levine Coley, Lindsay Lanteri, Christopher F Baum","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2024.2444567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Tobacco 21 (T21) laws (prohibiting tobacco sales under age 21) and flavor restrictions have recently been enacted, yet little is known about the extent to which these policies shifted adolescent tobacco use.<i>Objectives:</i> To examine the associations between state-level T21 laws and flavor restrictions with adolescent tobacco use overall and by age.<i>Methods:</i> We linked state-level T21 laws and flavor restrictions with individual-level data on self-reported levels of cigarette, cigar, and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among 979,477 (500,205 female/479,272 male) 14-18+-year-olds from the 2011-2021 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys. We estimated adjusted zero-inflated negative binomial regression models to predict the likelihood of zero use and frequency of use among users and calculated total predicted use, with year and state fixed effects.<i>Results:</i> There were no associations between flavor restrictions and cigarette, cigar, or ENDS use. There also were no associations between T21 laws and cigarette use; however, when categorized based on the laws' policy components, strong T21 laws were associated with lower cigarette use (total marginal effect estimate: -0.34; -0.59, -0.09; <i>p</i> = .009, showing a 0.34 day/month decline). T21 laws were associated with higher ENDS use (total marginal effect estimate: 0.36; 0.11, 0.60; <i>p</i> = .004, showing a 0.36 day/month increase). Policy effects did not vary by age.<i>Conclusion:</i> Current state policies aimed at reducing access to tobacco products have not curbed adolescent tobacco use. Our findings suggest that more comprehensive state laws, including T21 laws with strong policy components, are needed to fill gaps in federal age and flavor restrictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2024.2444567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tobacco 21 (T21) laws (prohibiting tobacco sales under age 21) and flavor restrictions have recently been enacted, yet little is known about the extent to which these policies shifted adolescent tobacco use.Objectives: To examine the associations between state-level T21 laws and flavor restrictions with adolescent tobacco use overall and by age.Methods: We linked state-level T21 laws and flavor restrictions with individual-level data on self-reported levels of cigarette, cigar, and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among 979,477 (500,205 female/479,272 male) 14-18+-year-olds from the 2011-2021 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys. We estimated adjusted zero-inflated negative binomial regression models to predict the likelihood of zero use and frequency of use among users and calculated total predicted use, with year and state fixed effects.Results: There were no associations between flavor restrictions and cigarette, cigar, or ENDS use. There also were no associations between T21 laws and cigarette use; however, when categorized based on the laws' policy components, strong T21 laws were associated with lower cigarette use (total marginal effect estimate: -0.34; -0.59, -0.09; p = .009, showing a 0.34 day/month decline). T21 laws were associated with higher ENDS use (total marginal effect estimate: 0.36; 0.11, 0.60; p = .004, showing a 0.36 day/month increase). Policy effects did not vary by age.Conclusion: Current state policies aimed at reducing access to tobacco products have not curbed adolescent tobacco use. Our findings suggest that more comprehensive state laws, including T21 laws with strong policy components, are needed to fill gaps in federal age and flavor restrictions.

青少年烟草使用对州烟草法律和口味限制的反应。
背景:烟草21 (T21)法律(禁止21岁以下的烟草销售)和口味限制最近颁布,但很少知道这些政策在多大程度上改变了青少年烟草使用。目的:研究州一级T21法律和风味限制与青少年总体和年龄烟草使用之间的关系。方法:我们将2011-2021年青少年风险行为调查中979,477名(500,205名女性/479,272名男性)14-18岁以上青少年的卷烟、雪茄和电子尼古丁传递系统(ENDS)使用自我报告水平的个人数据与州一级的T21法律和口味限制联系起来。我们估计了调整后的零膨胀负二项回归模型来预测用户零使用的可能性和使用频率,并计算了总预测使用量,并具有年份和州固定效应。结果:风味限制与香烟、雪茄或ENDS使用之间没有关联。T21法规与香烟使用之间也没有关联;然而,当根据法律的政策成分进行分类时,强有力的T21法律与较低的卷烟使用相关(总边际效应估计:-0.34;-0.59、-0.09;p =。009,环比下降0.34天)。T21定律与较高的终端使用相关(总边际效应估计:0.36;0.11、0.60;p =。004,每月增加0.36天)。政策效果并不因年龄而异。结论:目前旨在减少烟草制品获取的国家政策并未遏制青少年烟草使用。我们的研究结果表明,需要更全面的州法律,包括具有强有力政策成分的T21法律,来填补联邦年龄和口味限制方面的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信