Variable- and person-centered approaches to teacher support and learning satisfaction in blended English learning: the role of SDT motivation and learning engagement.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xuan Yang, Lynn Ling Li, Jingjing Jiang, Jianfen Ying
{"title":"Variable- and person-centered approaches to teacher support and learning satisfaction in blended English learning: the role of SDT motivation and learning engagement.","authors":"Xuan Yang, Lynn Ling Li, Jingjing Jiang, Jianfen Ying","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02569-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With blended learning boosting explosively, learning satisfaction is confronted with challenges. Aiming at its enhancement, teacher support, an essential element of instruction, was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To pinpoint the dynamics between teacher support and learning satisfaction, 376 university students who participated in blended English learning were involved in self-report questionnaires. A variable-centered approach for data analysis was employed to examine the chain mediation model, and a person-centered one was utilized for exploring more personalized learning patterns of the samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The variable-centered investigation validated the hypothesized chain mediation model. SDT motivation and learning engagement were two successful mediators, and they also formed an effective chain mediator between teacher support and learning satisfaction. The person-centered study analyzed teacher support and learning satisfaction reported, and identified three latent profiles: below-average-both, average-both, and high-both profile. Learners in different profiles were spotted with disparate traits, with those in high-both profile presenting the most favorable results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study addresses the gap in research on the four variables from a blended learning perspective, and innovatively combines variable-centered and person-centered analytical approaches, providing customized enlightenments into fostering students' progress. Pedagogical implications are part of discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11899696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02569-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With blended learning boosting explosively, learning satisfaction is confronted with challenges. Aiming at its enhancement, teacher support, an essential element of instruction, was investigated.

Methods: To pinpoint the dynamics between teacher support and learning satisfaction, 376 university students who participated in blended English learning were involved in self-report questionnaires. A variable-centered approach for data analysis was employed to examine the chain mediation model, and a person-centered one was utilized for exploring more personalized learning patterns of the samples.

Results: The variable-centered investigation validated the hypothesized chain mediation model. SDT motivation and learning engagement were two successful mediators, and they also formed an effective chain mediator between teacher support and learning satisfaction. The person-centered study analyzed teacher support and learning satisfaction reported, and identified three latent profiles: below-average-both, average-both, and high-both profile. Learners in different profiles were spotted with disparate traits, with those in high-both profile presenting the most favorable results.

Conclusion: This study addresses the gap in research on the four variables from a blended learning perspective, and innovatively combines variable-centered and person-centered analytical approaches, providing customized enlightenments into fostering students' progress. Pedagogical implications are part of discussion.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信