A comparison of the effectiveness of standard anterior bracket placement versus smile arc protection method: A randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Fahimeh Farzanegan, Alireza Ghasemzadeh, Mahsa Ghorbani, Hooman Shafaee
{"title":"A comparison of the effectiveness of standard anterior bracket placement versus smile arc protection method: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Fahimeh Farzanegan, Alireza Ghasemzadeh, Mahsa Ghorbani, Hooman Shafaee","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This randomized two-arm parallel trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of standard anterior bracket positioning with the smile arc protection (SAP) method in terms of occlusal and smile morphometric indices, and perceived post-treatment smile aesthetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients needing nonextraction orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to either the SAP or standard bracket placement group. Inclusion criteria were ages 11 to 25 years, nonextraction treatment, and good oral hygiene, all treated using the Roth 0.018 system. Primary outcomes assessed occlusal and smile morphometric changes using cephalograms, study models, and photographs. Perceived smile aesthetics was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical analyses included independent t-tests, paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and analysis of covariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients (mean age, 19.5 ± 5.5) were randomized evenly between the SAP and standard groups. Baseline characteristics were similar, and one patient from the SAP group was excluded. No significant differences were found between the groups for occlusal and smile morphometric variables before and after treatment (P > 0.05). Post-treatment, the smile arc significantly improved in the SAP group compared to both the standard method (P = 0.005) and its pretreatment state (P = 0.005). VAS scores from orthodontists and laypersons showed no significant differences (P > 0.05), but general dentists rated the SAP group's smiles as more attractive (P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SAP method was more effective in achieving a consonant smile arc than conventional bracket positioning. While other occlusal and morphometric changes showed no significant differences, general dentists found the SAP group's smiles more attractive. Further research is needed to confirm these results.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The research was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) database with the identification code IRCT20220108053669N3.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This randomized two-arm parallel trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of standard anterior bracket positioning with the smile arc protection (SAP) method in terms of occlusal and smile morphometric indices, and perceived post-treatment smile aesthetics.

Methods: Patients needing nonextraction orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to either the SAP or standard bracket placement group. Inclusion criteria were ages 11 to 25 years, nonextraction treatment, and good oral hygiene, all treated using the Roth 0.018 system. Primary outcomes assessed occlusal and smile morphometric changes using cephalograms, study models, and photographs. Perceived smile aesthetics was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical analyses included independent t-tests, paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and analysis of covariance.

Results: Forty-two patients (mean age, 19.5 ± 5.5) were randomized evenly between the SAP and standard groups. Baseline characteristics were similar, and one patient from the SAP group was excluded. No significant differences were found between the groups for occlusal and smile morphometric variables before and after treatment (P > 0.05). Post-treatment, the smile arc significantly improved in the SAP group compared to both the standard method (P = 0.005) and its pretreatment state (P = 0.005). VAS scores from orthodontists and laypersons showed no significant differences (P > 0.05), but general dentists rated the SAP group's smiles as more attractive (P = 0.002).

Conclusions: The SAP method was more effective in achieving a consonant smile arc than conventional bracket positioning. While other occlusal and morphometric changes showed no significant differences, general dentists found the SAP group's smiles more attractive. Further research is needed to confirm these results.

Registration: The research was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) database with the identification code IRCT20220108053669N3.

标准前支架放置与微笑弧线保护方法的有效性比较:一项随机临床试验。
目的:本随机对照试验旨在比较标准前支架定位与微笑弧度保护(SAP)方法在咬合和微笑形态测量指标以及治疗后感知的微笑美学方面的有效性。方法:将需要非拔牙正畸治疗的患者随机分为SAP组和标准托槽组。纳入标准为年龄11 ~ 25岁,未拔牙治疗,口腔卫生良好,均使用Roth 0.018系统治疗。主要结果评估咬合和微笑形态测量的变化,使用脑电图、研究模型和照片。采用视觉模拟量表(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)评价两组患者的微笑美感。统计分析包括独立t检验、配对t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和协方差分析。结果:42例患者平均年龄19.5±5.5岁,随机分为SAP组和标准组。基线特征相似,SAP组中有1例患者被排除。治疗前后两组间牙合、微笑形态测量指标差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后,SAP组的微笑弧度与标准方法(P = 0.005)和治疗前相比均有显著改善(P = 0.005)。正畸医生和外行人的VAS评分没有显著差异(P < 0.05),但普通牙医认为SAP组的微笑更有吸引力(P = 0.002)。结论:SAP法比常规托槽定位法更能有效地获得和谐的微笑弧度。虽然其他咬合和形态变化没有显示出显著差异,但普通牙医发现SAP组的微笑更有吸引力。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。注册:本研究已在伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT)数据库中注册,识别码为IRCT20220108053669N3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信