Acute complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of cuff arthropathy versus fracture.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.5397/cise.2024.00766
Chase T Nelson, Isabel Shaffrey, James Satalich, Haleigh Hopper, Conor O'Neill, Carl Edge, Brady Ernst, Jennifer L Vanderbeck
{"title":"Acute complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of cuff arthropathy versus fracture.","authors":"Chase T Nelson, Isabel Shaffrey, James Satalich, Haleigh Hopper, Conor O'Neill, Carl Edge, Brady Ernst, Jennifer L Vanderbeck","doi":"10.5397/cise.2024.00766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become increasingly popular in recent years, and this trend is expected to continue. However, differences in outcomes of RTSA for fractures compared with other indications are poorly understood. This study aimed to identify the compare the incidences of adverse events during RTSA to treat cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) versus RTSA to treat fractures, as well as identify risk factors for any adverse event.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RTSA from 2010 to 2020 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were included. Matched cohorts were created using nearest-neighbor matching. Independent sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to determine differences between groups, and binary logistic regression was performed to determine odds ratios and 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 27,607 CTA patients (94.5%) and 1,537 fracture patients (5.3%) underwent RTSA. Adverse events occurred in 1,088 CTA patients (3.9%) and 192 fracture patients (12.4%). Incidences of adverse events, postoperative transfusions, and returns to an operating room were all significantly higher in the fracture cohort compared with CTA patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following surgery, higher rates of adverse events were observed in the CTA patients compared with those in the fracture cohort. These findings improve our understanding of the effectiveness of an increasingly popular surgical intervention due to the use of a large database analysis to identify short-term complications and risk factors. Level of evidence: III.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"28 1","pages":"77-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2024.00766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become increasingly popular in recent years, and this trend is expected to continue. However, differences in outcomes of RTSA for fractures compared with other indications are poorly understood. This study aimed to identify the compare the incidences of adverse events during RTSA to treat cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) versus RTSA to treat fractures, as well as identify risk factors for any adverse event.

Methods: Patients who underwent RTSA from 2010 to 2020 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were included. Matched cohorts were created using nearest-neighbor matching. Independent sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to determine differences between groups, and binary logistic regression was performed to determine odds ratios and 95% CIs.

Results: In total, 27,607 CTA patients (94.5%) and 1,537 fracture patients (5.3%) underwent RTSA. Adverse events occurred in 1,088 CTA patients (3.9%) and 192 fracture patients (12.4%). Incidences of adverse events, postoperative transfusions, and returns to an operating room were all significantly higher in the fracture cohort compared with CTA patients.

Conclusions: Following surgery, higher rates of adverse events were observed in the CTA patients compared with those in the fracture cohort. These findings improve our understanding of the effectiveness of an increasingly popular surgical intervention due to the use of a large database analysis to identify short-term complications and risk factors. Level of evidence: III.

反向全肩关节置换术治疗袖带关节病与骨折的急性并发症。
背景:逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)近年来越来越流行,这一趋势预计将持续下去。然而,与其他适应症相比,RTSA治疗骨折的结果差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定RTSA治疗袖带撕裂性关节病(CTA)与RTSA治疗骨折期间不良事件发生率的比较,并确定任何不良事件的危险因素。方法:纳入2010 - 2020年国家外科质量改进计划数据库中接受RTSA的患者。使用最近邻匹配创建匹配队列。采用独立样本t检验和卡方检验确定组间差异,采用二元logistic回归确定优势比和95% ci。结果:共27,607例CTA患者(94.5%)和1,537例骨折患者(5.3%)接受了RTSA。不良事件发生在1088例CTA患者(3.9%)和192例骨折患者(12.4%)。与CTA患者相比,骨折组的不良事件、术后输血和返回手术室的发生率均显著高于CTA患者。结论:手术后,CTA患者的不良事件发生率高于骨折患者。由于使用了大型数据库分析来识别短期并发症和危险因素,这些发现提高了我们对日益流行的手术干预的有效性的理解。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信