Assessment of patient safety from their perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Q3 Nursing
Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240068.en
Bárbara Peres Gama, Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Mello, Diovane Ghignatti da Costa, Elena Bohomol
{"title":"Assessment of patient safety from their perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Bárbara Peres Gama, Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Mello, Diovane Ghignatti da Costa, Elena Bohomol","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240068.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to assess patient safety, from their own perspective, during hospitalization for COVID-19 in a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>cross-sectional study conducted in a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, involving patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. The sample included 129 participants hospitalized between March 2020 and June 2021 who responded to the Patient Measure of Safety instrument. Descriptive statistics and correlation tests were used to analyze sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and symptomatology related to the total score and each domain of the instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the majority of participants were male (50.8%), aged 56 years or younger (51.9%), and white (43.8%). The overall mean score of Patient Measure of Safety was 3.8±0,4, with variations between 3.0±0,4, in the \"equipment\" domain, to 4.1±0,5, in the \"communication and teamwork\" domain. There were no statistically significant differences among sociodemographic variables and comorbidities regarding safety perception. Statistical significance results were observed among those with specific symptoms such as cough (p=0.018), nausea and vomiting (p=0.020) and diarrhea (p=0.013) reflecting less favorable perception of safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>participants assessed the safety of care with the highest score in the \"communication and teamwork\" domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":"46 ","pages":"e20240068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240068.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to assess patient safety, from their own perspective, during hospitalization for COVID-19 in a university hospital.

Method: cross-sectional study conducted in a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, involving patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. The sample included 129 participants hospitalized between March 2020 and June 2021 who responded to the Patient Measure of Safety instrument. Descriptive statistics and correlation tests were used to analyze sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and symptomatology related to the total score and each domain of the instrument.

Results: the majority of participants were male (50.8%), aged 56 years or younger (51.9%), and white (43.8%). The overall mean score of Patient Measure of Safety was 3.8±0,4, with variations between 3.0±0,4, in the "equipment" domain, to 4.1±0,5, in the "communication and teamwork" domain. There were no statistically significant differences among sociodemographic variables and comorbidities regarding safety perception. Statistical significance results were observed among those with specific symptoms such as cough (p=0.018), nausea and vomiting (p=0.020) and diarrhea (p=0.013) reflecting less favorable perception of safety.

Conclusion: participants assessed the safety of care with the highest score in the "communication and teamwork" domain.

从患者角度评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的患者安全。
目的:从患者自身角度评估某高校医院新冠肺炎患者住院期间的安全性。方法:在巴西圣保罗一所大学医院进行横断面研究,纳入因COVID-19住院的患者。样本包括129名在2020年3月至2021年6月期间住院的参与者,他们对患者安全测量仪做出了回应。描述性统计和相关检验用于分析与总分和仪器各领域相关的社会人口学因素、合并症和症状。结果:大多数参与者为男性(50.8%),56岁及以下(51.9%),白人(43.8%)。患者安全测量的总体平均得分为3.8±0.4分,“设备”领域的平均得分为3.0±0.4分,“沟通和团队合作”领域的平均得分为4.1±0.5分。社会人口学变量和合并症在安全感知方面没有统计学上的显著差异。有咳嗽(p=0.018)、恶心呕吐(p=0.020)和腹泻(p=0.013)等特定症状的患者对安全的认知较差,结果有统计学意义。结论:被试对护理安全性的评价以“沟通与团队合作”领域得分最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信