Advancing virtual and hybrid team well-being through a job demand-resources lens.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Cass Coulston, Sukhi Shergill, Ricardo Twumasi, Myanna Duncan
{"title":"Advancing virtual and hybrid team well-being through a job demand-resources lens.","authors":"Cass Coulston, Sukhi Shergill, Ricardo Twumasi, Myanna Duncan","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2025.2472460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the modern workplace evolves, the shift to virtual and hybrid team working necessitates a re-evaluation of well-being. While workplace well-being research has predominantly focused on the individual level, understanding team-level well-being is critical, as its underlying psychological and social processes differ. This study applies the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) framework to virtual and hybrid contexts globally, demonstrating the dual nature of demands and resources at the team level, where the same constructs may contribute to driving positive gain cycles or negative loss cycles of well-being. Through reflexive thematic analysis, we analysed thirty semi-structured interviews with leaders and twenty-nine focus groups with 3-6 team members each (<i>n</i> = 110) across more than twelve industries and geographies. Our findings revealed three candidate themes: \"Choice Matters\", \"It's Business and It's Personal\" and \"Leader as Social Influencer\". This research extends JD-R theory by advancing its applicability to team-level well-being in virtual and hybrid contexts. Practical insights include empowering teams through redesigning work practices to establish sustainable boundaries, aligning communication norms, and fostering inclusive connections that accommodate diverse needs in the modern workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":51468,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","volume":"20 1","pages":"2472460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2025.2472460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the modern workplace evolves, the shift to virtual and hybrid team working necessitates a re-evaluation of well-being. While workplace well-being research has predominantly focused on the individual level, understanding team-level well-being is critical, as its underlying psychological and social processes differ. This study applies the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) framework to virtual and hybrid contexts globally, demonstrating the dual nature of demands and resources at the team level, where the same constructs may contribute to driving positive gain cycles or negative loss cycles of well-being. Through reflexive thematic analysis, we analysed thirty semi-structured interviews with leaders and twenty-nine focus groups with 3-6 team members each (n = 110) across more than twelve industries and geographies. Our findings revealed three candidate themes: "Choice Matters", "It's Business and It's Personal" and "Leader as Social Influencer". This research extends JD-R theory by advancing its applicability to team-level well-being in virtual and hybrid contexts. Practical insights include empowering teams through redesigning work practices to establish sustainable boundaries, aligning communication norms, and fostering inclusive connections that accommodate diverse needs in the modern workplace.

从工作需求-资源角度推进虚拟和混合团队的福祉。
随着现代工作场所的发展,向虚拟和混合团队工作的转变需要重新评估幸福感。虽然工作场所幸福感的研究主要集中在个人层面,但理解团队层面的幸福感是至关重要的,因为其潜在的心理和社会过程是不同的。本研究将工作需求-资源(JD-R)框架应用于全球虚拟和混合环境,展示了需求和资源在团队层面的双重性质,其中相同的结构可能有助于推动幸福感的积极增益周期或消极损失周期。通过反身性主题分析,我们分析了超过12个行业和地区的30个半结构化访谈和29个焦点小组,每个小组有3-6名团队成员(n = 110)。我们的研究结果揭示了三个候选主题:“选择很重要”、“商业和个人”以及“作为社会影响者的领导者”。本研究通过提高JD-R理论在虚拟和混合环境下对团队水平幸福感的适用性,扩展了JD-R理论。实用的见解包括通过重新设计工作实践来赋予团队权力,以建立可持续的界限,调整沟通规范,并培养包容的联系,以适应现代工作场所的不同需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being acknowledges the international and interdisciplinary nature of health-related issues. It intends to provide a meeting-point for studies using rigorous qualitative methodology of significance for issues related to human health and well-being. The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being is to support and to shape the emerging field of qualitative studies and to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of human health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信