Oral fluid supplementation for the prevention of post-dural puncture headache: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319481
Emmanuelle Cartron, Christelle Volteau, Maxime Leroy, Annastasia Voisine, Jérôme Emmanuel Dauvergne, Céline Ballet, Jean-Philippe Talarmin, Marie-Annick Quéau, Marylène Catinault, Emmanuelle Gazeau, Carole Haubertin, Romain Charreau, David Boutoille
{"title":"Oral fluid supplementation for the prevention of post-dural puncture headache: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Emmanuelle Cartron, Christelle Volteau, Maxime Leroy, Annastasia Voisine, Jérôme Emmanuel Dauvergne, Céline Ballet, Jean-Philippe Talarmin, Marie-Annick Quéau, Marylène Catinault, Emmanuelle Gazeau, Carole Haubertin, Romain Charreau, David Boutoille","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0319481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim(s): </strong>To investigate the impact of the absence of specific advice for oral fluid intake, compared to supplementation water intake on the occurrence of post-dural puncture headache.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, multicenter trial including hospitalized patients requiring a diagnostic lumbar puncture in seven hospitals in France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) either to receive no specific advice on oral fluid intake (FREE-FLUID), or to be encouraged to drink 2 liters of water (CONTROL) within the 2 hours after lumbar puncture. The primary outcome was the post-dural puncture headache rate within the 5 days after lumbar puncture, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. The secondary outcome was the time-to-post-dural puncture headache onset between Day 0 and Day 5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2016 and July 2019, we have included 554 participants. The primary outcomes occurs in 33.1% patients in the FREE-FLUID group, versus 38.0% in the CONTROL group with adjusted difference of 3.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients who had lumbar puncture, our study shows the noninferiority of the absence of specific advice on water intake after a lumbar puncture, compared with advice to increase oral fluid to prevent a post-dural puncture headache.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The value of questioning the appropriateness of non-evidence-based nursing care may allow time to be devoted to more relational and comforting care.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The study adheres to the CONSORT reporting guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials.gov (NCT02859233, August 9, 2016).</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 3","pages":"e0319481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim(s): To investigate the impact of the absence of specific advice for oral fluid intake, compared to supplementation water intake on the occurrence of post-dural puncture headache.

Design: A prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, multicenter trial including hospitalized patients requiring a diagnostic lumbar puncture in seven hospitals in France.

Methods: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) either to receive no specific advice on oral fluid intake (FREE-FLUID), or to be encouraged to drink 2 liters of water (CONTROL) within the 2 hours after lumbar puncture. The primary outcome was the post-dural puncture headache rate within the 5 days after lumbar puncture, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. The secondary outcome was the time-to-post-dural puncture headache onset between Day 0 and Day 5.

Results: From November 2016 and July 2019, we have included 554 participants. The primary outcomes occurs in 33.1% patients in the FREE-FLUID group, versus 38.0% in the CONTROL group with adjusted difference of 3.7%.

Conclusion: Among patients who had lumbar puncture, our study shows the noninferiority of the absence of specific advice on water intake after a lumbar puncture, compared with advice to increase oral fluid to prevent a post-dural puncture headache.

Impact: The value of questioning the appropriateness of non-evidence-based nursing care may allow time to be devoted to more relational and comforting care.

Reporting method: The study adheres to the CONSORT reporting guidelines.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov (NCT02859233, August 9, 2016).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

补充口服液预防硬脑膜穿刺后头痛:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
目的:研究与补充水摄入相比,缺乏对口服液体摄入的具体建议对硬脊膜穿刺后头痛发生的影响。设计:一项前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、多中心试验,包括法国7家医院需要诊断性腰椎穿刺的住院患者。方法:患者被随机分配(1:1),一组不接受关于口服液体摄入的具体建议(FREE-FLUID),另一组被鼓励在腰椎穿刺后2小时内喝2升水(CONTROL)。主要终点是腰椎穿刺后5天内硬脑膜穿刺后头痛率,非劣效裕度为10%。次要终点是第0天至第5天硬脑膜穿刺后头痛发作的时间。结果:从2016年11月到2019年7月,我们纳入了554名参与者。游离液治疗组的主要结局发生率为33.1%,对照组为38.0%,调整后差异为3.7%。结论:在腰椎穿刺患者中,我们的研究显示,与建议增加口服液以预防硬脊膜穿刺后头痛相比,缺乏对腰椎穿刺后饮水的具体建议是非劣效性的。影响:质疑非循证护理的适当性的价值可能会让时间投入到更多的关系和安慰护理上。报告方法:本研究遵循CONSORT报告指南。患者或公众捐款:没有患者或公众捐款。试验注册:Clinical Trials.gov (NCT02859233, 2016年8月9日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信