Does Topical Steroid Use Increase the Risk for Subsequent Tympanoplasty?

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004443
Lawrance Lee, Mihai A Bentan, Daniel H Coelho
{"title":"Does Topical Steroid Use Increase the Risk for Subsequent Tympanoplasty?","authors":"Lawrance Lee, Mihai A Bentan, Daniel H Coelho","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although the current data support the notion that combination therapy of topical steroids with antibiotics is a safe, and often superior, option for suppurative otitis media when compared to topical antibiotics alone, little is known about the impact of topical steroids on tympanic membrane (TM) healing and risk of residual perforation. This study aims to describe the long-term impact the addition of topical steroids to antibiotics has on TM healing, as measured by rates of subsequent tympanoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic health records were queried using TriNetX Research Network to construct cohorts of adult patients with \"infected\" TM perforation (ICD-10 code H66) and \"noninfected\" TM perforation (ICD-10 code H72). Both groups were further divided based on treatment with ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone (RxNorm codes). The measured outcome was whether or not the patient underwent tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy or ossicular reconstruction within 2 years following diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In \"infected\" patients, the ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone cohort demonstrated a small but significantly increased risk of undergoing tympanoplasty (1.12%) compared to the ofloxacin cohort (0.76%, p < 0.05). In \"noninfected\" patients, the ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone cohort demonstrated a significantly increased risk of undergoing tympanoplasty (6.87%) compared to the ofloxacin cohort (5.67%, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the setting of acute suppurative otitis media, there is a small but statistically significant increased risk of residual TM perforation when patients receive ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone compared to ofloxacin. However, the clinical significance of this risk must be weighed against the curative and symptomatic benefits of ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone over ofloxacin.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"46 4","pages":"413-417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Although the current data support the notion that combination therapy of topical steroids with antibiotics is a safe, and often superior, option for suppurative otitis media when compared to topical antibiotics alone, little is known about the impact of topical steroids on tympanic membrane (TM) healing and risk of residual perforation. This study aims to describe the long-term impact the addition of topical steroids to antibiotics has on TM healing, as measured by rates of subsequent tympanoplasty.

Methods: Electronic health records were queried using TriNetX Research Network to construct cohorts of adult patients with "infected" TM perforation (ICD-10 code H66) and "noninfected" TM perforation (ICD-10 code H72). Both groups were further divided based on treatment with ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone (RxNorm codes). The measured outcome was whether or not the patient underwent tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy or ossicular reconstruction within 2 years following diagnosis and treatment.

Results: In "infected" patients, the ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone cohort demonstrated a small but significantly increased risk of undergoing tympanoplasty (1.12%) compared to the ofloxacin cohort (0.76%, p < 0.05). In "noninfected" patients, the ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone cohort demonstrated a significantly increased risk of undergoing tympanoplasty (6.87%) compared to the ofloxacin cohort (5.67%, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: In the setting of acute suppurative otitis media, there is a small but statistically significant increased risk of residual TM perforation when patients receive ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone compared to ofloxacin. However, the clinical significance of this risk must be weighed against the curative and symptomatic benefits of ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone over ofloxacin.

局部使用类固醇会增加后续鼓室成形术的风险吗?
目的:虽然目前的数据支持这样的观点,即与单独使用外用抗生素相比,外用类固醇联合抗生素治疗化脓性中耳炎是一种安全且通常更好的选择,但对于外用类固醇对鼓膜愈合和残留穿孔风险的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在描述在抗生素基础上局部添加类固醇对中耳炎愈合的长期影响,通过随后的鼓室成形术率来衡量。方法:使用TriNetX研究网络查询电子健康记录,构建“感染”TM穿孔(ICD-10代码H66)和“未感染”TM穿孔(ICD-10代码H72)的成年患者队列。两组患者根据氧氟沙星或环丙沙星/地塞米松(RxNorm代码)治疗情况进一步分组。测量的结果是患者在诊断和治疗后2年内是否接受鼓室成形术而不切除乳突或听骨重建。结果:在“感染”患者中,环丙沙星/地塞米松组比氧氟沙星组(0.76%,p < 0.05)行鼓室成形术的风险虽小但显著增加(1.12%)。在“未感染”的患者中,环丙沙星/地塞米松组接受鼓室成形术的风险(6.87%)明显高于氧氟沙星组(5.67%,p < 0.05)。结论:在急性化脓性中耳炎的情况下,与氧氟沙星相比,环丙沙星/地塞米松治疗的患者残留TM穿孔的风险虽小但有统计学意义。然而,这种风险的临床意义必须与环丙沙星/地塞米松优于氧氟沙星的治疗和症状益处进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信