Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Older Adults, Ages 80-90.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004452
Kevin Y Zhan, Karmela Dizdar, Dorina Kallogjeri, James Bao, Sabina Dang, Jordan Varghese, David Lee, Amit Walia, Nedim Durakovic, Cameron C Wick, Craig A Buchman, Jacques A Herzog, Matthew A Shew
{"title":"Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Older Adults, Ages 80-90.","authors":"Kevin Y Zhan, Karmela Dizdar, Dorina Kallogjeri, James Bao, Sabina Dang, Jordan Varghese, David Lee, Amit Walia, Nedim Durakovic, Cameron C Wick, Craig A Buchman, Jacques A Herzog, Matthew A Shew","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether postoperative speech recognition after cochlear implantation (CI) differ between age groups of 80 to 89 and 90+.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Older adult (80+ years old) bilateral sensorineural hearing loss patients undergoing CI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Therapeutic, CI.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Speech testing battery at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Self-reported balance and vertigo symptoms were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 221 patients were included in this study, with 171 cases ages 80 to 89 and 50 cases ≥90 years old. A total of 60.3% had an abnormal preoperative cognitive screen based on either Montreal Cognitive Assessment or Mini Mental State Examination. No major demographic or clinical variables were noted across age groups. Mean 1 year postoperative speech scores were as follows for ages 80 to 89 versus 90+, respectively: CNC 50% (±21%) versus 47% (±18%), AzBio Quiet 54% (±26%) versus 50% (±25%), and AzBio +10SNR 28% (±21%) versus 21% (±17%). Age, abnormal cognitive screen, duration of hearing loss, and comorbidity measures such as BMI, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27, and American Society of Anesthesiology physical status class were not correlated with any speech measure. Overall rates of persistent self-reported balance symptoms at activation were 22.7%, decreasing to 7.5% at 1 year. Datalogging was >11 hours use on average for both age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CI speech recognition in the 80 to 89 and 90+ age range significantly improved from preoperative scores. No major speech recognition differences were identified between age groups. Age at implantation, abnormal cognitive screening, and comorbidity status did not influence speech perception, which suggests that candidacy in older adult CI patients should not be withheld strictly due to these parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"46 4","pages":"381-387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether postoperative speech recognition after cochlear implantation (CI) differ between age groups of 80 to 89 and 90+.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary academic referral center.

Patients: Older adult (80+ years old) bilateral sensorineural hearing loss patients undergoing CI.

Interventions: Therapeutic, CI.

Main outcome measures: Speech testing battery at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Self-reported balance and vertigo symptoms were also assessed.

Results: A total of 221 patients were included in this study, with 171 cases ages 80 to 89 and 50 cases ≥90 years old. A total of 60.3% had an abnormal preoperative cognitive screen based on either Montreal Cognitive Assessment or Mini Mental State Examination. No major demographic or clinical variables were noted across age groups. Mean 1 year postoperative speech scores were as follows for ages 80 to 89 versus 90+, respectively: CNC 50% (±21%) versus 47% (±18%), AzBio Quiet 54% (±26%) versus 50% (±25%), and AzBio +10SNR 28% (±21%) versus 21% (±17%). Age, abnormal cognitive screen, duration of hearing loss, and comorbidity measures such as BMI, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27, and American Society of Anesthesiology physical status class were not correlated with any speech measure. Overall rates of persistent self-reported balance symptoms at activation were 22.7%, decreasing to 7.5% at 1 year. Datalogging was >11 hours use on average for both age groups.

Conclusions: CI speech recognition in the 80 to 89 and 90+ age range significantly improved from preoperative scores. No major speech recognition differences were identified between age groups. Age at implantation, abnormal cognitive screening, and comorbidity status did not influence speech perception, which suggests that candidacy in older adult CI patients should not be withheld strictly due to these parameters.

80-90岁老年人的人工耳蜗植入效果。
目的:评价80 ~ 89岁和90岁以上年龄组人工耳蜗植入术后语音识别(CI)的差异。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。单位:三级学术转诊中心。患者:老年成人(80岁以上)双侧感音神经性听力损失患者。干预措施:治疗性、CI。主要观察指标:术后3、6、12个月的语音测试。自我报告的平衡和眩晕症状也被评估。结果:共纳入221例患者,其中年龄80 ~ 89岁171例,年龄≥90岁50例。根据蒙特利尔认知评估或迷你精神状态检查,共有60.3%的患者术前认知筛查异常。各年龄组未发现主要的人口统计学或临床变量。80 - 89岁和90岁以上的平均术后1年言语评分分别为:CNC 50%(±21%)对47%(±18%),AzBio Quiet 54%(±26%)对50%(±25%),AzBio +10SNR 28%(±21%)对21%(±17%)。年龄、异常认知屏幕、听力损失持续时间和共病测量如BMI、成人共病评估-27和美国麻醉学会身体状态等级与任何言语测量无关。激活时持续自我报告平衡症状的总体比率为22.7%,1年后降至7.5%。两个年龄组的数据记录平均使用时间为11小时。结论:80 ~ 89岁和90岁以上年龄组CI语音识别评分较术前显著提高。在不同年龄组之间没有发现主要的语音识别差异。植入年龄、异常认知筛查和合并症状况对言语感知没有影响,这表明不应因为这些参数而严格拒绝老年CI患者的候选资格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信